Loading...
01/19/19811 `L05 January 19, 1981 The regular meeting of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield' was called to order by the President in the Council Chamber of the Village Hall on Monday, January 19, 1981 at 8:04 P.M. The Clerk called the roll and reported that the following were Present: Bernard Forrest, President Norma Gavin Jerold L. Heisler Cynthia J. Marty Edwin B. Seidman Vernon E.-Swanson J. Robert York and.that a quorum was present and in attendance at.the meeting. Also present were Village Attorney James Stucko and Village Manager Robert Franz. Trustee Seidman moved, seconded by Trustee Marty that the minutes of January 5, 1981 be approved. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVE WARRANT Trustee Heisler moved, seconded by Trustee NO. W -81 -1 Swanson, that payment of bills, including fund transfers and reimbursements, be approved for payment. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Gavin, Heisler, Marty, Seidman, Swanson, York (6) NAYS: None (0) TREASURER'S REPORT Treas. George Valentine reported that "on the whole,the system is pretty good ": He stated that General Fund revenues are back up to projections with several of the General Fund revenue accounts exceeding their projection enough to make up for sales tax receipts which are a bit less than projections. Basically, expenditures are within. projections. VCDC &.PLAN COMMISSION REPORT & RECOMMENDATION SPECIAL USE DEERFIELD SAVINGS & LOAN DRIVE -IN of the principal use, 3) a variation unanimously recommended approval of Mgr. Robert Franz reported that the VCDC con- sidered a petition from the Deerfield Savings and Loan for: 1) a Special Use to allow a drive -in facility, 2) a Special Use to allow off - street parking on a lot other than that of landscape screening requirements. The VCDC the petition. Mgr. Franz further reported that the Plan Commission, following a joint public hear- ing with the Zoning Board of Appeals on December 11, 1980 to consider the 3 -part petition of the Deerfield Savings & Loan, recommended (ayes:6, nays: 0, abstention: 1) approval of the request for: 1) a Special Use to allow a drive -in facility, and 2) a Special Use to allow off-street parking on a lot other than that of the principal use. In addition, the Plan Commission commented that.they favored a masonry wall rather than 'chain link fencing for which variation the petitioner had sought approval from the Board of Zoning Appeals. They also commented that they favored a wider median strip than the 4 ft. strip proposed on the plan. Village Attorney Stucko pointed out that the Board of Zoning Appeals has jurisdiction in the matter of landscapirg'screening, and Mgr. Franz read minutes of the BZA showing their reasons and vote of 4 to 1 to grant approval of the petitioner's request for chain link fencing. Mayor Forrest noted that mention but no recommendation had been made in the reports regarding driveway width as well. as median strip widths and asked Att'y. Stucko for clarification on these points. Attorney Stucko stated that these two items are not elements of the Zoning Ordinance but are aspects of the Subdivision Code which is a part of the Municipal Code and that the Village Board rather than the Plan Conun:.':has the authority to consider these items. Trustee Swanson noted that without some kind of engineering study and report it would be difficult for the Board to determine appropriate driveway and median strip widths. Mgr. Franz stated that previous minutes of the Community Development Group contained information in this regard and that they had looked at the Deerfield Savings and Loan plan specifically and again when the Action Avenue proposal was considered and felt that the proposed widths would present no problems. �. 206 Trustee Marty moved, seconded by Trustee Seidman, -.l) that the recommendation of-the. Plan.Commission he accepted and the Village Attorney .be directed to prepare: a)-an ordinance authorizing a-Special Use for a Drive -in Facility; and b) an ordinance authorizing a_Special Use for off - street parking on a lot other than that.of the principal use. 2) to vary the requirements of the Subdivision Code to provide for a 4 ft. median.strip and 20 ft. ingress and egress driveway widths. Motion carried unanimously. Prior to adoption of an ordinance to vary the Subdivision Code, Staff will'recomme_nd for Board xeview the size of median and driveway widths which should be required. REPORT & RECOMMENDATION Mgr. Franz stated that the Plan Commission PLAN COMMISSION had held a hearing November 13, 1980 *to con REZONING /PUD j si.der a petition of Salvatore Buccola and MALLIN PROPERTY James DiPietro to rezone the northernmost parcel of land commonly known as the Fritz - Mallin property from R -2_ (single family) to C -2 (outlying commercial) and their request of a Special Use for a commercial planned unit development for the entire property. The Plan Commission recommended by a vote of 7 to 0 that the rezoning request be denied. They further recommended by a vote of 6 to 1 that if the property were commercially rezoned as requested, the plan as presented should be denied because it would not meet the standards for a commercial planned unit develop- ment and the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. -Trustee Swanson moved, seconded by Trustee Heisler, that the recommendation of the Plan Commission be approved and the petition be denied. Mr. Buccola was present. He spoke to the Board regarding the proposed development and presented an artist rendering. He submitted that the internal traffic patterns, green areas, type of architecture, etc. indicated their attempt to protect the - adjoining residential area. He stated that their intent was to rent to tenants with select shops. Mrs. Laura Lee Christoph of Briarwood Vista presented a petition signed by adjacent property owners to deny the rezoning request and a planned unit development. Other residents of Briarwood Vista were present and objected. Mr. Bruce Blietz, owner of- adjacent undeveloped property to the north,stated he felt that a better means of integration from one type of use to next adjacent properties on the north and east could be planned. After considerable discussion, the motion to accept the Plan Commission's recommenda- tion and deny the petition carried by the following vote: AYES: Heisler, Seidman, Swanson, Forrest (4) NAYS: Gavin, Marty, York (3) The Board recessed at 9:10 and reconvened at 9:20, ail members being present. VCDC & PLAN COMMISSION Mgr. Franz read the report and recommendation REPORT & RECOMMENDATION of the VCDC wherein they stated that inasmuch REZONING R -4 to C -1 as the subject property lies within the Village 617 CENTRAL AVE. (FRECSKA) Center, the VCDC had reviewed the petition.with particular attention to the effects that the rezoning and re -use of the property might have upon the center,and that by a vote of 6 -0 recommended the request be approved. The Plan Commission held a public hearing December. 4, 1980. The Plan Commission reported the request was in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan-and that by a. vote of 6 -0 recommend approval of the requested rezoning. After a brief discussion with Mr. Frecska in which it was determined that he was aware of the storm water retention requirements in the area, Trustee Marty moved, seconded by Trustee Heisler, to accept the recommendation of the Plan Coiranission that the rezoning be granted. and that the attorney be instructed to prepare the necessary ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. VCDC & PLAN COMMISSION Trustee York expressed concern that Mr.,Harrigan, REPORT & RECOMMENDATION the petitioner, had not indicated a specific use REZONING R -4 to C -1 in his request and that rezoning in the area 649 CENTRAL AVENUE (HARRIGAN) might take place piece -meal. He expressed the i! wish that individual owners might cooperate. and request rezoning simultaneously. Trustee Marty moved, seconded by Trustee Swanson, to accept the recommendation of the.. Plan Commission that the rezoning be granted'and that the attorney be instructed to prepare the necessary ordinance. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Gavin, Heisler, Marty, Swanson (4) NAYS:. Seidman, York (2) r ,0� Trustee,Marty moved, seconded by Trustee Swanson, that the VCDC and Plan Commission be directed to consider the.the. entire area,south of the Commons as one petition for rezoning, examining in detail the good arguments, both pro and con, in this approach.. Motion carried unanimously. PLAN•COMMISSION Mgr.;F,ranz stated that Mr. Garrity wished REPORT & RECOMMENDATION to build a home on a lot created by metes and RESUBDIVISION (GARRITY) bounds rather than by formal subdivision which HAZEL AVE. (W. OF BRIDGE) cannot be built upon until formally re- 'subdivided. The Plan Commission held a hearing on- August 28, 1980 and continued until December 4, 1980 as a. topographical study had to be made. The Plan Commission, by a vote-of 4 to 2, recommended approval of the re- subdivision sub - j ect _to: the following: 1..- -The petitioner be allowed to place a private drive on the previously dedicated right -of -way to service the proposed lot instead of a fully improved street. A turn- around should also be provided with the turn - around and driveway both subject to the Fire Department's approval. 2. A. .covenant be placed on all .three lots fronting on the 'unimproved right -of- ..way to provide for the development of a fully improved street at the expense of: the owners of the three lots at such time as any one or both of'the southernmost lots are developed. 3. If a private drive is approved, appropriate- "hold harmless" agreements be entered into to protect the village. After discussion with Mr. Garrity and determining that he was aware and accepted the multiplicity of requirements (State, Village, Drainage District, etc.) that must be met before a home can be built on his property since it lies in a flood plain, etc., Trustee Seidman moved, seconded by Trustee Gavin, that the Plan Com- mission report and recommendation be accepted and that the Village Attorney be directed to prepare the necessary ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. . Mayor Forrest requested a report by next week on the flood plain conditions of the Garrity property. REPORT & RECOMMENDATION Attorney Stucko stated that he wrote a letter VILLAGE ATTORNEY & STAFF to the Mayor and Board which was a result of PUBLIC NUISANCE ASSEMBLAGE consideration given to a recommendation which ORDINANCE originated with the Deerfield Youth .Commission with the backing of the Police Department. He stated that specifically the issue he was asked to address was the desirability of an ordinance directed toward assemblages of people on private property (parties, activities) of a loud and boisterous nature. The police are looking for authority to cite and hold liable for violation of Deerfield ordinances an owner of a premises ,(even though not present) where disorderly activity occurs. Attorney Stucko stated that the same sort of legal problems presented-by the Deerfield Parental Responsibility-law attend this matter and that again Deerfield would be moving forward in unchartered waters, but there is ample need as expressed by the Chief 'of Police and Youth Council and also ample precedent in that the enactment of the Parental' Responsibility law has operated successfully. He stated that while other communities have not enacted specific legislation, Deerfield's Home Rule powers are a.sufficient legal basis for Deerfield to do so. He stated that he had spoken with • member on the legal. staff of the Illinois Municipal League, and they indicated in • general sense that his approach was a sound one and that the the reasoning process was similar to the Parental Responsibility law. They also indicated they would be most interested in seeing whatever the Deerfield Board adopted. Mrs. Marty moved,.' seconded by Trustee Swanson, to approve the report and instruct the attorney to prepar the necessary ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Forrest - suggested that the ordinance be reviewed with the Police Department and the Youth Council before it is presented to the Board. STAFF REPORT & RECOMMENDATION The Bicycle Safety report consisted of 1) a RE:'BICYCLE SAFETY report from the Public Works Director, Edmund Klasinski, and substantiated by Village Engineer James'-Soyka, regarding the construction of bicycle ramps,. broken sidewalk repair, etc., at a total cost of $32,709.00., 2) a report from the Police Department regarding forma- tion of a Bicycle Safety Patrol involving education and enforcement at a cost of $11,908.00. Mgr. Franz stated that Staff was not asking immediate Board endorsement of the­repor.t but wished to give the Board the opportunity to ask questions of the Police Department regarding its report and recommendations. Regarding the report from Mr. Klasinski, Trustee Swanson inquired whether the ramp construction program would be effective with or without the Lake -Cook Bicycle Path. 208 Mgr. Franz stated the proposed improvements were to facilitate traffic on major .routes of the Village. Trustee York moved, seconded by Trustee Swanson, that the Finance Committee consider the $32;709.00 construction costs of the program when the next budget is prepared. Motion carried unanimously: The Bicycle Safety Education Program will.continue in schools as well as to other community groups. The Bicycle Safety Patrol program would-- involve: 1) hiring 0f,_ five college -age Bicycle Patrol Officers for the purpose of enforcing Deerfield's bicycle ordinance.' The Officers would be dressed in a designated uniform, patrol. assigned areas on their bicycles, operate as 2 -man teams, and maintain radio con- tact with the Police Department; 2) establishment of a Bicycle Compliance Board consisting of two college -age youth,appointed by the Mayor and trained by the Police Department,to act as Judges in Deerfield's bi- monthly bicycle court. Police Chief Brandt stated that the enforcement part of the program would include ticketing adult violators but having youth appear before a Bicycle Compliance Board - -- that the chief concern of the police is for youth safety. Mr. Gerald Bard, Chair- man of the Youth Council., stressed the importance of uniform enforcement in regard - to adults as well as youth. Mrs. Rose Mary Stavropoulos, Chairman of the Human Relations Commission, stated that irresponsible youth riding bicycles are a threat _ to senior citizens some of whom have been hit. Trustee Heisler noted that whereas a pedestrian cannot compete with a bicycle, a bicycle cannot compete with a car and that,the proposed program stressing bicycle safety education and enforcement by Bicycle Patrol Officers was in order. Chief Brandt stated that he had applied by.mail to the Illinois Department of.Trans- portation for funding. While response by telephone has been positive, he will not, know for about,ninety days whether funding will be granted. Mayor Forrest stated that inasmuch as there appeared sufficient money in the police budget to get the.... program under way, he would personally recommend, if the Board approved, that Chief Brandt go ahead with the program. Chief Brandt stated he would appreciate Board approval but would still pursue State funding. Trustee Heisler moved, seconded by Trustee Seidman, that the Board implement the Bicycle Safety Patrol training program and instruct the Police Department to set it up. Motion passed by the following vote: AYES: Gavin, Heisler, Marty, Seidman, Swanson, York (6) NAYS: None (0) Trustee•Marty moved, seconded by Trustee Seidman, that an ordinance be prepared amending Art. XV of the Deerfield Vehicle and Traffic Code. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Forrest stated that he would like to consider the report and recommendation, of the Manpower Commission with regard to vacancies on the.Youth Council. He recommended the appointments of Darrell Ehlert and Neil Samuels. Trustee Siedman moved, seconded 'by Trustee Marty, that the President's recommendation to appoint Darrell Ehlert and Neil Samuels to the Youth Council be approved. Motion carried unanimously. CONSENT AGENDA The following items were considered on the Consent Agenda: _ PROHIBIT PARKING An Ordinance prohibiting parking on Fair Oaks. FAIR OAKS AVENUE Avenue between Chestnut and Forest Avenues. _. ORDINANCE NO. 0 -81 -04 between 10 a.m. and 12 noon weekdays. PROHIBIT PARKING MOUNTAIN DRIVE /MOUNTAIN COURT OVERLAND TRAIL /PORTAGE PASS ORDINANCE NO. 0 -81 -05 INCREASE FEES .SEWER CONNECTION INCREASE FEES WATER CONNECTION SETBACK VARIATION 430 BRIERHILL RD. (SHAW) ORDINANCE NO. 0 -81 -06 unanimously. Ordinance prohibiting parking on Mountain Drive, Mountain Court, Overland Trail, and Portage Pass from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. weekdays. First reading of ordinance. First reading of ordinance. Trustee Seidman moved, seconded by Trustee Swanson, to waive rules to permit passage on first reading of ordinance granting a setback variaticn for 430 Brierhill Rd. Motion.carried I 209 CONSTRUCTION ON Yearly Resolution for Construction on State STATE HIGHWAYS - Highways for work performed by Village employees. RESOLUTION NO. 0 -81 -01 Trustee'"Seidman moved, seconded by Trustee Gavin; that the Consent Agenda be.approved, incldding: 'passage of ordinances'prohibitinb parking on Fair Oaks Avenue, parking on Mountain Drive /Mountain Court /Overland Trail /Portage Pass, and setback variation for 430 Brierhill Rd. On first reading).. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Gavin, Heisler, Marty, Seidman, Swanson, York (6) NAYS: None (0)' The Mayor signed the ordinances indicating his approval thereof.. VECCHIONE Trustee Marty moved, seconded by Trustee Heisler, PRE - ANNEXATION AGREEMENT to waive the rules to adopt the resolution on RESOLUTION NO. 0 -81 -02 first reading. Motion - carried unanimously. Trustee Marty moved, seconded by Trustee Swanson, to adopt the•resolu fton approving the pre- annexation agreement. Trustee Seidman, wished to,.limit the size of the structure to 90,000 sq. ft required for a State warrant for a traffic signal. Two residents of Clavinia•stated their objections to annexation of the Vecchione property.`' After a shortdiscussion of the pre - annexation provisions regarding signalization and intersection improvements at a cost of•$160,000 to the developer, Mr. Vecchione agreed to inclusion of an escalation clause of 10% annually from January 1983. Motion-to-adopt resolution approving amended pre- annexation agreement passed by following vote: AYES: Gavin, Heisler, Marty, Swanson, York (5) NAYS: Seidman (1) ANNEXATION Trustee Marty moved; seconded by Trustee Swanson, VECCHIONE PROPERTY (6.8 Acres) that the rules be waived to permit passage of the ORDINANCE NO. .0 -81 -07 ordinance on first reading. Motion carried unanimously. Trustee Marty moved, seconded by Trustee Swanson, that'the ordinance annexing the Vecchione - property (6.8 acres) be passed. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Gavin, Heisler, Marty, Swanson, York (5) NAYS:' Seidman (1) VECCHIONE PROPERTY (6.8 acres) Trustee Marty moved, seconded by Trustee Gavin, ZONED-I =1 that the rules be waived to permit passage of ORDINANCE NO. 0 -81 -08 the ordinance on first reading. Motion carried unanimously. Trustee Marty moved, seconded ty Trustee Gavin, that the ordinance zoning the Vecchione property (6.8 acres) as I -1 be passed. Motion.carried by the following vote: AYES: Gavin, Heisler, Marty, Swanson, York (5) NAYS:- Seidman (1) REQUEST Mr. Victor Marcus of Mr. Adams Restaurant CLASS E LIQUOR LICENSE requested a Class E Liquor License. He stated MR. ADAPTS RESTAURANT that he had a beer and wine license, but that == he lost business to other restaurants since he could not serve hard liquor. Inasmuch as no Board member chose to make a motion to in- crease the number of Class E Liquor Licenses, the Mayor advised Mr•. Marcus that in effect his request was denied. Trustee Marty stated that she favored raising daily meter parking fees to fifty cents. She stated that the increase in commuter bus fares would encourage riders to drive to the station rather than take the commuter bus. Trustee Heisler felt that bus rider- ship should not be artificially stimulated by increase parking fees. Trustee Marty stated that increased fees would provide funds for extra manpower in shoveling and maintenance around the station, and that she felt that there are times when out of necessity corners are being cut. Trustee Swanson felt the parking system is working qu'te.well_ and he did net favor tampering with it. Trustee Marty moved, seconded by Trustee Gavin, that parking fees be raised to fifty cents to conform with charges in' surrounding areas. Motion failed by the following vote: AYES: Gavin, Marty, York (3) NAYS: Heisler, Seidman, Swanson, Forrest (4) 210 Trustee York asked Mgr.-Franz to_se'e what can be done to have 'sidewalks on one side of both Waukegan and Deerfield Roads in the center of the Village not only plowed but clear of ice inasmuch as many senior citizens must walk to do their marketing.. Mgr.. Franz explained the difficulties involved but will look into the matter. Mayor Forrest asked what effect Bannockburn's decision to restrict traffic on Wilmot and Telegraphs Roads was having on Deerfield. Chief. Brandt stated that Deerfield was exper- iencing no particular problems, but that traffic was being diverted to Greenwood Ave. and Deerfield Road which were experiencing a 25% increase at peak hours --- roughly 150 cars per hour. Mayor Forrest directed that an updated report on the traffic situation be prepared for the February 2 Board agenda. Mgr. Franz stated that the Mayor needed to sign an amendment agreement between the RTA and Deerfield -- -the extension for second year funding previously agreed to by the Board. Trustee Marty moved, seconded by Trustee Heisler, that Mayor Forrest be authorized, to sign the agreement between the RTA and Deerfield. Motion passed by the following vote: AYES: Gavin, Heisler, Marty, Seidman, Swanson, York (6) NAYS: None (0) There being no further business to come before the Board, upon motion by Trustee Seidman, the meeting was adjourned at 10:40 p.m. 0 ATTEST: r Village Clerk APPROVED: 1 Village President 1 1