Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
O-05-15
VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD LAKE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 0 -05 -15 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO A SPECIAL USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SOCRATES GREEK - AMERICAN SCHOOL IN THE I -1 OFFICE, RESEARCH AND RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD, LAKE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, this 18th day of April , 2005. Published in pamphlet form by authority of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield, Lake and Cook Counties, Illinois, this 19thday of April , 2005. VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD LAKE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 0 -05 -15 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO A SPECIAL USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SOCRATES GREEK - AMERICAN SCHOOL IN THE I -1 OFFICE, RESEARCH AND RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Sindesmos Hellinkes - Kinotitos of Chicago (sometimes referred to as the Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland), a religious corporation ( "Petitioner "), is the owner of certain property commonly known as 1085 Lake Cook Road and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Subject Property ") and has petitioned the Plan Commission of the Village of Deerfield for: (i) an amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development of the Subject Property in the I -1 Office, Research and Restricted Industrial District and approval of a Phase I final development plan permitting the renovation of the former State Farm office building existing on the Subject Property, and the construction of a 1,387 square foot addition to said existing building, for use as a private elementary and middle school as a special use of the Subject Property in the I -1 Office, Research and Restricted Industrial District under and pursuant to the provisions of Article 6.01 -C, Paragraph 17, Article 12.09 and Article 13.11 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Deerfield, as amended (hereinafter "Phase I "); and (ii) for conceptual approval of a Phase II addition of a 11,680 square foot gymnasium/multi - purpose room to the proposed private elementary and middle school, with variations to reduce the number of required parking spaces, to reduce the size of the angled parking spaces and aisles and to reduce the east perimeter set -back of the Planned Unit Development to five (5) feet to allow the location of additional parking spaces five feet (5') distant from the east property line of the Subject Property (hereinafter "Phase II "); and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Deerfield held a public hearing on February 24, 2005 to consider Petitioner's proposed Amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development authorizing a final development plan for said Phase I renovation of the former State Farm office building existing on the Subject Property, and the construction of a 1,387 square foot addition to said existing building, for a private elementary and middle school as a Special Use of the Subject Property in I -1 Office, Research and Restricted Industrial District, and for conceptual approval of a future Phase II addition to the proposed private elementary and middle school, said hearing being held pursuant to public notice and conforming in all respects, in both manner and form, with the requirements of the statutes of the State of Illinois and the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Deerfield; and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Deerfield, after considering the evidence and supporting materials offered at said public hearing, submitted its written report to the Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield recommending approval of an amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development of the Subject Property in the I -1 Office, Research and Restricted Industrial District to permit the Phase I renovation of the former State Farm office building on the Subject Property, including a 1,387 square foot addition to the south end of the existing building, as a Special Use of the Subject Property as a private elementary and middle school, and for conceptual approval of said Phase II addition to the proposed elementary and middle school, including variations; and, WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield concur in the recommendation of the Plan Commission to approve an amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development authorizing a final development plan for said Phase I renovation of the former State Farm office building existing on the Subject Property, and the construction of a 1,387 square foot addition to said existing building, for a private elementary and middle school as a Special Use of the Subject Property in I -1 Office, Research and Restricted Industrial District, and for conceptual approval of said Phase II addition to the proposed elementary and middle school, subject to the future submission and approval of preliminary and final development plans for said Phase II addition; and, WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield have considered and reviewed the proposed plan for the Subject Property, the supporting materials submitted by the Petitioner, the evidence adduced at said public hearing, and the findings of fact and recommendations of the Plan Commission of the Village of Deerfield; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD, LAKE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: That the above and foregoing recitals, being material to this ordinance, are hereby incorporated by this reference and made a part of this ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: That the President and Board of Trustees do hereby find that substantial evidence supporting the Plan Commission recommendations was adduced at said public hearing and that the proposed amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development for the Subject Property to permit a private elementary and middle school to be developed, established and used as a Special Use of the Subject Property fully complies with the requirements and standards set forth in Article 6.01 -C, Paragraph 17, Article 12.09 and Article 13.11 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Deerfield. SECTION 3: That the President and Board of Trustees do hereby approve an amendment to 1911 the Special Use Planned Unit Development of the Subject Property authorizing a final development plan for said Phase I renovation of the former State Farm office building existing on the Subject Property, and the construction of a 1,387 square foot addition to said existing building, for use as a private elementary and middle school as a Special Use of the Subject Property in I -1 Office, Research and Restricted Industrial District, and for conceptual approval of said Phase II addition to the proposed elementary and middle school, subject to the future submission and approval of preliminary and final development plans for said Phase II addition, subject, however, to the following conditions, regulations and restrictions: A. That the construction, development and use of the Subject Property for Phase I of said private elementary and middle school shall be in conformance with the documents, materials and exhibits comprising the Final Development Plan for the Subject Property attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit B. B. That the private elementary and middle school hereby authorized is limited to the renovation of the existing 18,291 square foot former State Farm office building and the construction of a new 1,387 square foot addition to the building, for a combined student enrollment capacity of 244; a parking lot containing 116 parking spaces (inclusive of five (5) handicap parking spaces); a play area at the northeast corner of the site; a pre- school play area on the east side of the building adjacent to the pre - school; driveway entrance and traffic circulation improvements including a drop -off area for the elementary and middle school and a drop -off area for the pre - school; a monument sign and flagpoles at the entrance to the school campus, all in accordance with the documents, materials and exhibits comprising the Final Development Plan for the Subject Property attached hereto as Exhibit B. C. The addition of a future 11,680 square foot gymnasium/multi - purpose room is approved in concept as Phase II of the private elementary and middle school, with an increased student capacity of 262, including variations to reduce the required number of parking spaces to 154 (inclusive of 18 land - banked parking spaces), a variation to reduce the east sideyard set -back to permit motor vehicle parking spaces to be located 5 feet from the east property line of the Subject Property, and a variation to reduce the required size of angled parking spaces and parking aisles, all subject to the future submission and approval of an amendment to the Final Development Plan in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Deerfield. -4- D. The Phase I auditorium, and the Phase II gymnasium/multi - purpose room hereby approved in concept, shall be used for school activities only, which shall include shared school activities with the private high school previously approved as a Special Use of the property immediately adjacent to and south of the Subject Property. E. Petitioner acknowledges that the property abutting and immediately east of the Subject Property is zoned and used for public uses including telecommunications antenna towers and structures, and that the future construction of additional telecommunications antenna towers and structures on said property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Deerfield and is likely to occur. Petitioner represented to the Plan Commission and to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield that such uses are compatible with the private elementary and middle school use approved for the Subject Property by this ordinance and that the Petitioner has knowingly and voluntarily waived any objections to any such future use of the abutting property. F. All representations submitted and made by the Petitioner to the Plan Commission and to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield. G. Petitioner =s initial and continued compliance with the Final Development Plan approved by Ordinance 0 -91 -26 for the Subject Property, except as hereby amended, and with all applicable provisions of the Development Code and Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Deerfield. SECTION 4: That the Final Development Plan hereby approved and authorized as an amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development authorizing a private elementary and middle school as a Special Use of the Subject Property shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Petitioner and Petitioner's successors, grantees, transferees and assigns, and any violation of the conditions hereinabove set forth by Petitioner or its successors, grantees, transferees or assigns shall authorize the revocation of the Special Use hereby authorized. SECTION 5: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record this Ordinance in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County, Illinois at Petitioner =s expense. SECTION 6: That this Ordinance, and each of its terms, shall be the effective legislative act -5- of a home rule municipality without regard to whether such Ordinance should: (a) contain terms contrary to the provisions of current or subsequent non - preemptive state law; or, (b) legislate in a manner or regarding a matter not delegated to municipalities by state law. It is the intent of the corporate authorities of the Village of Deerfield that to the extent that the terms of this Ordinance should be inconsistent with any non - preemptive state law, this Ordinance shall supersede state law in that regard within its jurisdiction. SECTION 6: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. PASSED this 18th day of April , 2005. AYES: Benton, Kayne, Rosenthal, Seiden, Swanson, Wylie (6) NAYS: None (0) ABSENT: None (0) ABSTAIN: None (0) APPROVED this 1 sth d ATTEST: Village Clerk Exhibit B Documents Comprising Final Development Plan for the Socrates Greek - American Elementary and Middle School Existing Site Plan Sheet No. A -0.0 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 01- 27 -05, presented to the Plan Commission on 02 -24 -05 and revised 03- 07 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. Phase I Site Plan with Remodeled Existing Building Sheet No. AO.Ia for the Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 2 -24 -05 and revised 03- 07 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. Phase I Site Plan with Remodeled Existing Building Sheet No. AO.1 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 01 -27 -05 presented to the Plan Commission on 02 -24 -05 and revised 03- 07 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. 4. Phase I Site Plan at Street Intersections Sheet No. AO.1 b for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, presented to the Plan Commission on 02 -24 -05 and revised 03- 07 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. Phase II Site Plan with Existing Building and Future Addition Sheet No. AO.2 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated O 1 -27 -05 and presented to the Plan Commission 02 -24 -05 and revised 03- 07 -05, 04 -01 -05 and 04- 05 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. 6. Phase I Floor Plan Sheet No. A -1.1 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 01 -27 -05 and presented to the Plan Commission on 02 -24 -05 and 03- 07 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. 7. Phase I Exterior Elevations Sheet No. A -2.1 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated O 1- 27 -05, presented to the Plan Commission on 02 -24 -05 and revised 03- 07-05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. 8. Exterior Renderings depicting view looking northeast and view looking northwest depicting new addition at auditorium and new pre- school entry Sheet No. A -2.2 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated O 1- 27 -05, and presented to the Plan Commission on 02 -24- 05 and 03- 07 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc.. 9. Existing Building Photos Sheet No. P -1.0 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 01-27-05 and presented to the Plan Commission on 02 -24 -05 and 03 -07 -05 by Church Building Architects, Inc. 10. Existing Plant Material Location Map Sheet No. L -1 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, by PDS Design Group, Inc. presented to the Plan Commission 02 -24 -05 and 03- 07 -05. 11. Proposed Landscape Plan Sheet No. L -2 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, By PDS Design Group, Inc. presented to the Plan Commission 02 -24 -05 and revised and presented to the Plan Commission 03- 07 -05. ' 12. 13 -Page Letter dated January 26, 2005, from Anthony J. Lewis, Director of Fire Prevention for the Northbrook Fire Department to Pearson, Brown and Associates, Inc., containing the Preliminary Review comments of the Northbrook Fire Department conditionally approving the Preliminary Plan submitted by Petitioner. 13. Traffic Planning Study by Daniel P. Brinkman of Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc., dated February 8, 2005 and revised February 17, 2005, regarding the Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, 1085 Lake Cook Road, Deerfield, Illinois, Exhibits 1 through 10 included as a part of said report and appendices 1, II, III and IV attached thereto. -2- ) STATE OF ILLINOIS SS T AND COOK COU ) NIES OF LAKE ) VILLAGE OFD EERFIELD Illlllllilllllllll 1111 ll ll illlllllli�illl �,, Doc #: 0604818081 Fee: $158.50 Eugene "Gene" Moore 1 Cook County Recorder of Deeds Date: 02/17/2006 03:03 PM Pg: t of 68 lerlc of the V illage of Deerfield, Lake ointed DePuty village C that she is the duly ap e and accurate °f ent to a co certifies true Amendm ed hereby that the attached is a and Authorizing an I 1 pff1Ce, The undersign Illinois, and er. an School in the - and Cook Counties, al Development fo elhe Socrates Plan a Fin Socrates Greek -� 0 -05 -15 APPrOVing ment for the Ordinance e planned unit Develop District Special use d Restricted Industrial D Research an Dated this Ma 19 2005 Submitted by. SEAL Village of Qeerfield 850 Waukegan Road Deerfield, IL 60015 .j VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD LAKE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 0 -05 -15 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO A SPECIAL USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SOCRATES GREEK - AMERICAN SCHOOL IN THE I -1 OFFICE, RESEARCH AND RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD, LAKE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, this 18th day of April. , 2005. Published in pamphlet form by authority of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield, Lake and Cook Counties, Illinois, this 19thday of April , 2005. VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD LAKE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 0 -05 -15 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO A SPECIAL USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SOCRATES GREEK - AMERICAN SCHOOL IN THE I -1 OFFICE, RESEARCH AND RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Sindesmos Hellinkes - Kinotitos of Chicago (sometimes referred to as the Helleuc American Academy of Chicagoland), a religious corporation ( "Petitioner "), is the owner of certain' property commonly known as 1085 Lake Cook Road and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Subject Property ") and has petitioned the Plan Coni nission of the Village of Deerfield for: (i) an amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development of the Subject Property in the I -1 Office, Research and Restricted Industrial District and approval of a Phase I final development plan permitting the renovation of the former State Faun office building existing on the Subject Property, and the construction of a 1,387 square foot addition to said existing building, for use as a private elementary and middle school as a special use of the Subject Property in the I -1 Office, Research and Restricted Industrial District under and pursuant to the provisions of Article 6.01 -C, Paragraph 17, Article 12.09 and Article 13.11 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Deerfield, as amended (hereinafter "Phase I "); and (ii) for conceptual approval of a Phase II addition of a 11,680 square foot gymnasium/multi- purpose room to the proposed private elementary and middle school, with variations to reduce the number of required parking spaces, to reduce the size of the angled parking spaces and aisles and to reduce the east perimeter set -back of the Planned Unit Development to five (5) feet to allow the location of additional parking spaces five feet (5') distant from the east property line of the Subject Property (hereinafter "Phase IF'); and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Deerfield held a public .hearing on February 24, 2005 to consider Petitioner's proposed Amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development authorizing a final development plan for said Phase I renovation of the former State Farm office building existing on the Subject Property, and the construction of a 1,387 square foot addition to said existing building, for a private elementary and middle school as a Special Use of the Subject Property in I -1 Office, Research and Restricted Industrial District, and for conceptual approval of a future Phase II addition to the proposed private elementary and middle school, said hearing being held pursuant to public notice and conforming in all respects, in both manner and form, With the requirements of the statutes of the State of Illinois and the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Deerfield; and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Deerfield, after considering the evidence and supporting materials offered at said public hearing, submitted its written report to the Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield reconnmending approval of an amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development of the Subject Property in the I -1 Office, Research and Restricted Industrial District to permit the Phase I renovation of the former State Farm office building on the Subject Property, including a 1,387 square foot addition to the south end of the existing building, as a Special Use of the Subject Property as a private elementary and middle school, and for conceptual approval of said Phase II addition to the proposed elementary and middle school, including variations; and, WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield concur in the recommendation of the Plan Commission to approve an amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development authorizing a final development plan for said Phase I renovation of the former State Farm office building existing on the Subject Property, and the construction of a 1,387 square foot addition to said existing building, for a private elementary and middle school as a Special Use of the Subject Property in I -1 Office, Research and Restricted Industrial District, and for conceptual approval of said Phase II addition to the proposed elementary and middle school, subject to the future submission and approval of preliminary and final development plans for said Phase II addition; and, WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield have considered and reviewed the proposed plan for the Subject Property, the supporting materials submitted by the Petitioner, the evidence adduced at said public hearing, and the findings of fact and reconuinendations of the Plan Commission of the Village of Deerfield; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD, LAKE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows: SECTION 1: That the above and foregoing recitals, being material to this ordinance, are hereby incorporated by this reference and made a part of this ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: That the President and Board of Trustees do hereby find that substantial evidence supporting the Plan Commission recommendations was adduced at said public hearing and that the proposed amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development for the Subject Property to permit a private elementary and middle school to be developed, established and used as a Special Use of the Subject Property (ally complies with the requirements and standards set forth in Article 6.01 -C, Paragraph 17, Article 12.09 and Article 13.11 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Deerfield. SECTION 3: That the President and Board of Trustees do hereby approve an amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development of the Subject Property authorizing a final development plan for said Phase I renovation of the former State Farm office building existing on the Subject Property, and the construction of a 1,387 square foot addition to said existing building, for use as a private elementary and middle school as a Special Use of the Subject Property in I -1 Office, Research and Restricted Industrial District, and for conceptual approval of said Phase II addition to the proposed elementary and middle school, subject to the future submission and approval of preliminary and final development plans for said Phase II addition, subject, however, to the following conditions, regulations and restrictions: A. That the construction, development and use of the Subject Property for Phase I of said private elementary and middle school shall be in conformance with the documents, materials and exhibits comprising the Final Development Plan for the Subject Property attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit B. B. That the private elementary and middle school hereby authorized is limited to the renovation of the existing 18,291 square foot former State Farm office building and the construction of anew 1,387 square foot addition to the building, for a combined student enrollment capacity of 244; a parking lot containing 116 parking spaces (inclusive of five (5) handicap parking spaces); a play area at the northeast corner of the site; a pre- school play area on the east side of the building adjacent to the pre - school; driveway entrance and traffic circulation improvements including a drop -off area for the elementary and middle school and a drop -off area for the pre - school; a monument sign and flagpoles at the entrance to the school campus, all in accordance with the documents, materials and exhibits comprising the Final Development Plan for the Subject Property attached hereto as Exhibit B. C. The addition of a future 11,680 square foot gynulasitmn/multi- purpose room is approved in concept as Phase II of the private elementary and middle school, with an increased student capacity of 262, including variations to reduce the required number of parking spaces. to 154 (inclusive of 18 land - banked parking spaces), a variation to reduce the east sideyard set -back to permit motor vehicle parking spaces to be located 5 feet from the east property line of the Subject Property, and a variation to reduce the required size of angled parking spaces and parking aisles, all subject to the future submission and approval of an amendment to the Final Development Plan in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Deerfield. me D. The Phase I auditorium, and the Phase II gymnasium/multi- purpose room hereby approved in concept, shall be used for school activities only, which shall include shared school activities with the private high school previously approved as a Special Use of the property immediately adjacent to and south of the Subject Property. E. Petitioner acknowledges that the property abutting and immediately east of the. Subject Property is zoned and used for public uses including telecommunications antenna towers and structures, and that the future construction of additional telecommunications antenna towers and structures on said property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Deerfield and is likely to occur. Petitioner represented to the Plan Commission and to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield that such uses are compatible with the private elementary and middle school use approved for the Subject Property by this ordinance and that the Petitioner has knowingly and voluntarily waived any objections to any such future use of the abutting property. F. All representations submitted and made by the Petitioner to the Plan Commission and to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Deerfield. G. Petitioner =s initial and continued compliance with the Final Development Plan approved'by Ordinance 0 -91 -26 for the Subject Property, except as hereby amended, and with all applicable provisions of the Development Code and Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Deerfield. SECTION 4: That the Final Development Plan hereby approved and authorized as an amendment to the Special Use Planned Unit Development authorizing a private elementary and middle school as a Special Use of the Subject Property shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Petitioner and Petitioner's successors, grantees, transferees and assigns, and any violation of the conditions hereinabove set forth by Petitioner or its successors, grantees, transferees or assigns shall authorize the revocation of the Special Use hereby authorized. SECTION 5: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record this Ordinance in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County, Illinois at Petitioner =s expense. SECTION 6: That this Ordinance, and each of its terms, shall be the effective legislative act -5- of a home rule municipality without regard to whether such Ordinance should: (a) contain terms contrary to the provisions of current or subsequent non - preemptive state law; or, (b) legislate in a mariner or regarding a matter not delegated to municipalities by state law. It is the intent of the corporate authorities of the Village of Deerfield that to the extent that the terms of this Ordinance should be inconsistent with any non - preemptive state law, this Ordinance shall supersede state law in that regard within its jurisdiction. SECTION 6: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. PASSED this 18th day of April , 2005. AYES: Benton, Kayne, Rosenthal, Seiden, Swanson, Wylie (6) NAYS: None (0) -6- EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION .PARCEL 1: LOT 2.1N STATE FARM .RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHEAST % OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 10, 1991 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 91340699, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS, AND ACCESS AND . FOR CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, USE, MAINTENANCE,-REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF THE. FRONTAGE ROAD, AS CREATED BY DECLARATION AND GRANT OF EASEMENT DATED AUGUST 1, 198'1 AND RECORDED SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 25987860, BY LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 30,1972- AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 44913, OVER AND ACROSS THE LAND DESCRIBED THEREIN. PARCEL 3: NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT AS CONTAINED IN ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT MADE BY AND BETWEEN DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, DATED. FEBRUARY 15, 2002 AND RECORDED, MARCH 7, 2002 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 0020261185. Common Address:' 1085 Lake Cook Road Dee+field, Illinois PIN: 04 -05- 200 -012 Exhibit B Documents Comprising Final Development Plan for the Socrates Greek- American Elementary and Middle School 1. Existing Site Plan Sheet No. A -0.0 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 01- 27 -05, presented to the Plan Commission on 02 -24 -05 and revised 03- 07 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. 2. Phase I Site Plan with Remodeled Existing Building Sheet No. A0.1 a for the Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 2 -24 -05 and revised 03- 07 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. 3. Phase I Site Plan with Remodeled Existing Building Sheet No. A0.1 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 01 -27 -05 presented to the Plan Commission on 02 -24 -05 and revised 03- 07 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. 4. Phase I Site Plan at Street Intersections Sheet No. A0.1 b for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, presented to the Plan Conunission on 02 -24 -05 and revised 03- 07 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. 5. Phase II Site Plan with Existing Building and Future Addition Sheet No. A0.2 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 01 -27 -05 and presented to the Plan Commission 02 -24 -05 and revised 03- 07 -05, 04 -01 -05 and 04- 05 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. 6. Phase I Floor Plan Sheet No. A -1.1 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 01 -27 -05 and presented to the Plan Commission on 02 -24 -05 and 03- 07 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. 7. Phase I Exterior Elevations Sheet No. A -2.1 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 01- 27 -05, presented to the Plan Commission on 02 -24 -05 and revised 03- 07-05, by Church Building Architects, Inc. S. Exterior Renderings depicting view looking northeast and view looking northwest depicting new addition at auditorium and new pre- school entry Sheet No. A -2.2 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 01- 27 -05, and presented to the Plan Cormmission on 02 -24- 05 and 03- 07 -05, by Church Building Architects, Inc.. 9. Existing Building Photos Sheet No. P -1.0 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, dated 01 -27 -05 and presented to the Plan Commission on 02 -24 -05 and 03 -07 -05 by Church Building Architects, Inc. 10. Existing Plant Material Location Map Sheet No. L -1 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, by PDS Design Group, Inc. presented to the Plan Commission 02 -24 -05 and 03- 07 -05. 11. Proposed Landscape Plan Sheet No. L -2 for Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, By PDS Design Group, Inc. presented to the Plan Corrunission 02 -24 -05 and revised and presented to the Plan Commission 03- 07 -05. 12. 13 -Page Letter dated January 26, 2005, from Anthony J. Lewis, Director of Fire Prevention for the Northbrook Fire Department to Pearson, Brown and Associates, Inc., containing the Preliminary Review continents of the Northbrook Fire Department conditionally approving the Preliminary Plan submitted by Petitioner. 13. Traffic Planning Study by Daniel P. Brinkman of Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc., dated February 8, 2005 and revised February 17, 2005, regarding the Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland, 1085 Lake Cook Road, Deerfield, Illinois, Exhibits 1 through 10 included as a part of said report and appendices I, II, III and IV attached thereto. -2- E3 IIIII 11111111111111111 IIII IIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIII 11111111111111111111111111111111111 Jill III 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 JIM AREA CALCULATIONS: Existing Site 4.97Acros = 216,615.375q.Ft Existing Building 18,291.00 Sq. Ft Existing Paving and Sidewalks 71,392.00 Sq. Ft. Total Impervious Mae 89,683.00 Sq. Ft 41.40% . ' ! 1 j I 1 1 1 in•a.wcn nano ----------- ------ -- ------ --- -- --- --- ------ I I � � r.s•rrrr •• I i I - I`YL I i I 1 I ( �• a �. r ; I 0 I J - EjlbPa, king Lot, 132 Si paces _ - _ NCC h T o , i I , :I it it ! 14 I pj1 U C om d EXISTING SITE PLAN c....... o S c lJ I . .. u �- z Q --- - - -... - ' - -- - -- -_ - - -- ----- - - - - -- _... - - - -- - - - - - -- © i l l l l l l l l I l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l Ill l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l i l l l l l i l l i l l l l l l l l l I l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l I l l l i l l l l l l l l l l 11111111111111111111111111111 ! I I 1 1111111111111! 11 11111111111 0 M 1111 III III 11111111111111111 !11111111111(11111111! III! 111! 111111 it I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I III 1 111111 it I I I I I I I I I I I I I$ 11 111111111111 I i l l l l Ill! I l i 111 I I 1 11111 1 1 1 Ill I l l ill I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I Q 0�11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111111111111 13111111111111111I11i111111 I I m 1111111111111111IIIII Illi m 11111111! 1111111!! 1111111111111111! 1111111111111111111 11 11111111111111 lllllil 11111 11 111111 1111i!t,111111i m i ll 1111111111 O IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIf1fIrI11rIIIIliIIllrltrllril1111iI11rr111rrItltlrrl H tliilllltrl p O IIIIIIIII111111111111111111111111111111111. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIf11111fIIIIII11111111111111iI1tilrlltilllllllllllllllllllllllilllltltlllllirrillltllltlll O "6.x4.13 all III IIIIIIIIIIII III 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Mill 111111IIII II111111 III Ill III III [lilt III IIII1 Ill 111111 Ill Ill 1111111 lilt 1I111 Ill 111111111 ,1111111111111111 Ill Ill 1111111 ® 11111111111111111111111111 III IIII IIII11111111111111 Ill 111 Ill 1111111111111111111lilt] IIIII lilt 11 lilt 1111111111111111 Ill 1111111111 It 1111 Ill 1111111Ill 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IMES 0 s J t � 1 Clf 4 SY. MY'"" MONS- '� It t' try t t":S 'tli Z f rt' � 2M!•ii t � � ..; l��k . • J r k � c{- n C:. 4L P f Nil 1 a Fill Y �fS S 'I I�f��jryr<t s . xis.. .... - .• -.. .. iI �.. .. �..1 .. 1111141M1Iy} � tl ? :qL J 1' E 1 y � a ........... Nil 1 a Fill Y �fS S 'I I�f��jryr<t s . xis.. .... - .• -.. .. iI �.. .. �..1 .. 1111141M1Iy} � tl ? :qL J 1' 0 ® iiii�iiiiiiii�iiiiiti�iiiiiiii��ii�iiiiiii�i��iiiiiiii�iiii�iiii�iiiiiiiiiiiii��iiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit�iitiiii�i�iii�iiiiiii�iiiiiiiLiL���i�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiii ® 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111ilIIIIIIIII1111111 11'Il1111111111 '11111111111111111111111111 11111 ° - PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN \.• STO nPH 1 - r� f 1 y — uApE`� a• NEW M--MT Y - STO g .a - ' SID / PEREW. PLANnNC PUmR0U8 Y -_ _ AREA _ .a.rmu 4°1°: ',m•" . a �•r ' PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL 10 . OAn _ m SURFAEE - RET PUY AREA • KIK AC61 ] r W 1 •WlE W -Ir - TO BE RENOVFD ✓ Y J, ,a��ypa,,aa,,� ry�p�� 9$��,� _ '� AGN 1 511I6fT RFO WWPIE' �• —R a AmtlmWr aMern : ' r Tw _ Emnwa 55.. M - - suro a unosc.pp+o . luaTelnwm a1N®wr - _ m aE }•:r : gym) cg � a,..m, o•r _ REwoaED (el ; '1'a+6• --� - � I. wO ' c�arw �u Nwwy,•�m• , x• cv.. _ -' � � ' � 70 _ 77 1.' �1° u"Pr 1 MMLTEFWE CRABIPR6 r Tm C - TO BE 1.rc qes paq - = REMOMro rq f _ raN 7 nOYP8011 BWC 6MNC! a' - TY Ta m PROm�CTED .. I QAU 3 BtmRp Gall 4.$• EJi. 0) _ 1 DUMA TAME - 1 AN TA 2 •ENwa' Ir - 2e - t. 4c wo STO t .au 7T11u6Ipp _ ro �,-•Y• I ® g• m 7 Y69pp AP• BMW Nib . A - REMOVED . .� >aA HANOICAPPE9 _ PARKING TO 16 i9a vadab •Or.4,M.' id' M U L 12 AIA ]RAIN p�.�. OREpS a6 IIfIlElFlf tRgEN - REFER TO $MEET . .. :. PR�GEOVCETM..,. �.• :. ". ,� :. _ .- t'. • ?� _ _ .. ... PwmNOb,_ Na�ilA a$qn t 0 �W ... ...+.3!� -ii A. .. 1 - EMT LOCATION 1 I' R '� � � - � Y• O +%•�• - AND DIMENSIONS i - 6 ALL WNl!$•. . -y I i (4q �C � .� AND amB.Pwo ! °• -: `Al' Q S - i ® a s E — AIIAR REMoVTD (1) 'i-.l. ` TO. __ - IT $ m •m _ i • $ 1 NUR _ '^ REFER To'.: i ,.. - I c�{ -_ i4" ORAWIN 2 AC,I' • Y r.w V. y. { DUel1P1G AOpnoN ® U - a ... i 5c . 7 roT ".i -\ �E a] • i r I •— �V-I.RSt' DECIDUOUS TREE PU TNG DETAIL ` ) 'rERGREEN TREE PUNTING DETAIL / .b .- ..._.- _..�......: ,,.'.. .i.:i. -•nom "'156. _.. .._......�__- ...- ....._._.... -_ P V p E O - Cu= GENERAL'NOTES: _ I. Od _ J / V D5SIGN GROUP, INC. " now .rwar ^s s � •an* n za w w. a r :al rw*,.uwa � rw`w°""a'ctaO",w: w" wsw va nAr o. rss ac v° auu sc n .,m nu.waar m+o x " pw1 vmra: a �a m amaw.ea.m . • � � a � ° a � "`�S " ° : �°t' ` a P . �� � � "6� 1 ...6aK zz = _ _ - • la,�lnq9. H as M > Y 1s• M N6.•1Yn.9 ^d nnl e4s4an . 7^n`"" v "��waKa • ;n� � tam „ , o°Y Aa� R �w u•m�rai � lu mjua i+ •i °� ".a �,6 w �a; �rte� • ,.�..,rn aaw c�aa R.a.., PI.'.��", "�"�":a � , .M.��.aa a � LL / a arG V � — - W _ _ < _ a rwaa.a t M 9W.w n oases .w I Ror 6mvr 6a,6 r.r Amr U P.O. BO% 24, PMEATON, IWNOIS 60139 1p" 1`. w a n �+Paa+�"°�o N'^m'•wr "+.o aw a �r w,""�na `w A,a°"nl ^'"' vnll@,auoi'„i00oa`,afi"',m,.N•rm ,a"eou"fdvrt m M�c•a. o a,. rc "" 1O"' n' ° fL m°`t an: I a« ""` �I'.. B �� E� 3 m ` _ A P[ nag _ uAw N = phone 630.802.0741• lo. fi30.666.0507 a NAVr Au wmHr ar oo• Amr Rau w maAaan naa nomvl n • ar "u raven u a wmr A1wa x nul rrom aua 9iw nu r x Paw v nr a yea w anm avu wr se IsAlm nm6 nry lw Ra] rar m we xn.wn I Z n a aw.a amv n. w n r a wP a mor.N a ww a swn r r Pr. PP.a. nom ao< v smaa a aPA6 .P. ab a muaa z 5 _ ® IIIIIII111111111111111111111111111111111111111, Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll11111111111111111111 D January 26, 2005 740 Dundee Road Northbrook, IL 60062 Pearson, Brown & Associates, Inc. 1850 W. Winchester Road, Suite 205 Libertyville, Illinois.60048 F w =-I (847) 272 -2141 FAX" (347) 272 -3294 RHEEI V rED F E B - 1 2005 PEARSON, BROWN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Re: 1085 Lake Cook Road — Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland The Northbrook Fire Prevention Bureau has received Drawing Sheet Numbers A -00 through A -1.1 for the property located at 1085 Lake Cook Road, Deerfield, Illinois for review on January 12, 2005. These submittals have been reviewed in accordance with BOCA Building Code 1999 edition, International Fire and Mechanical Codes 2000 edition, all BOCA and municipal referenced standards, municipal ordinances, and good fire protection practices. The following items have been noted in this review: This property space is an existing single story educational occupancy, made of non - specified construction. The following review comments are for preliminary review purposes only. A full set of architectural, mechanical, electrical, and fire protection drawings will be required prior to issue of a building permit. The adopted NFPA standards are as follows: 1. NFPA 13, Automatic Sprinkler Systems, 2002 edition. 2. NFPA 14, Standpipe and Hose Systems, 2003 edition. 3. NFPA 20, Installation of Centrifugal Fire Pumps, 1999 edition. 4. NFPA 25, Inspection, Testing and maintenance of Water Based Fire Protection System, 2002 edition. 5. NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm Code, 2002 edition. 6. NFPA 96, Installation of Equipment for Removal of Smoke and Grease -Laden Vapors for Commercial Cooking Equipment, 2001 edition. 7. NFPA 231, General Storage, 1999 edition. a 8. NFPA 231C, Rack Storage, 1999 edition. 9. NFPA 231D, Storage of Rubber Tires, 1999 edition. 10. NFPA 30B, Manufacturer and Storage of Aerosol Products, 2002 edition. a,, D - 05-- 15 In the event of conflict between the Fire Protection provisions of the 2000 International Fire Code and the 1999 BOCA National Building Code, the, 1999 BOCA National building Code shall be applicable. Municipal 7rdinance F -901.1 "The appendixes of all NFPA standards are to be considered as a part of each standard and are considered a "shall" requirement and not "should information ". Municipal Ordinance F -112 The following shall be observed during demolition: 1. All temporary heating units shall be listed and installed per the International Mechanical Code. IFC Section 1403 2. Smoking shall be prohibited within the construction site. IFC Section 1404.1 Combustible debris, rubbish and waste material shall be removed from buildings at the end of, each work shift. IFC Section 1404.2 . 4. All fire protection features shall be maintained and shall not be altered in any way that will cause the loss of protection or create a situation that is less safe than the original building condition. IFC Section 1409, 1412, 1413 Fire extinguishers shall be provided for every 75 feet of travel IFC Section 1414 All egress and emergency lighting shall be maintained during demolition IFC Section 1400 Contact the Northbrook Fire Prevention Bureau at 847 -272 -2141, extension 139 to schedule a pre - demolition walk through. A minimum of 48 hours notice shall be required. 8. A permanent or temporary key box with access keys shall be provided at a location agreed to by the fire department. IFC Section 1400 9. All fire lanes shall be maintained during demolition. IFC Section 1400 Due to the extent of interior modifications affecting automatic sprinkler coverages, a licensed sprinkler contractor shaft be contracted to provide a set of automatic sprinkler shop drawings. Automatic sprinkler contractor shop drawings shall be provided for review prior to issue of a building permit. Due to the extent of interior modifications affecting automatic fire alarm coverages, a licensed fire alarm contractor shall be contracted to provide a set of automatic fire alarm shop drawings. Automatic fire alarm contractor shop drawings shall be provided for review prior to issue of a building permit. The submitted preliminary drawings indicate a change in use of an existing building, an addition and a future expansion. This letter shall reflect all requirements that shall be addressed by the Northbrook Fire Department for the existing building and building addition. Any future architectural work will be addressed at the time of submittal and is subject to all requirements, codes, and standards in effect at that time. This letter is meant to serve as a guide to the architect for requirements for future submittal and is not an actual final review. It should be noted that material submitted is insufficient to perform an architectural review. If all items noted in this letter are addressed by the owner, architect, engineer, and fire protection contractors, this use change and building addition is approved. Provide a full set of architectural, engineering, and fire protection drawings. These shall be provided prior to issue of building permit. D,� & - C) s- -'9- 1. Plans and specifications for the installation / modification of the automatic sprinkler system shall be submitted for review and approval.. Provide automatic sprinkler contractor shop drawings for review. Indicate all new or modified existing pipe routing, material catalog cut sheets, and hydraulic calculations (as required by NFPA 13). BOCA Section 114, 906.3 NFPA 13 Section 14 2. Provide a certificate stating that all underground mains have been flushed, tested, and chlorinated before connection to the sprinkler system. 3. All hangers and hanger locations shall be in accordance with NFPA 13. 4. A flush -type fire department connection shall be provided. BOCA Section 916..5 NFPA 13 81.6 The fire department connection shall be arranged so that the use of any single fire department connection shall supply all sprinkler /standpipe systems within the building. BOCA Section 916.2 NFPA 13 8.16 Spare sprinklers shall be provided in the spare sprinkler cabinet in accordance with NFPA 13 requirements. A. 200 sprinklers = 6 space sprinklers B. 300 to 1000 sprinklers = 12 space sprinklers C.. 1000 and greater = 24 space sprinklers. NFPA 13 6.2.9.5 Sprinklers subject to mechanical injury shall be protected with listed guards. NFPA 13 62.8 Provide a hanger detail and locations on -the drawing. NFPA 13 Section-14. 9. Sprinkler protection shall be provided in all rooms of all buildings regardless of the'size of the room. Sprinkler protection shall be provided in compliance with Chapter 6, Article 11 of the Village of Northbrook Building and Construction Regulations. Municipal- Ordinance F -903.2 10. All sprinkler deflectors shall be locatedlinstalled in accordance with NFPA 13, and manufacturer's listing requirements. BOCA Section 906 NFPA 13 8.3.1.1, 8.1.1 11. Sprinklers shall be located in areas free of obstructions in compliance with NFPA 13 requirements. NFPA 13 8.3.1.1, 8.1.1 12. Provide.a wet/dry system inspector's test connection. NFPA 13 8.16 4 13. Provide auxiliary drains as required. NFPA 13 8.15.2.5 14. Before any sprinkler piping is concealed, a hanger inspection shall be conducted by the fire department. A minimum of 48 -hour notification shall be required to schedule the inspection. 15. Final approval of the sprinkler. installation / modification shall be subject-to a hydrostatic test (200 -psi for 2- hours) to be witnessed by the Fire Department. On dry pipe systems, also provide an air hydrostatic test. A minimum of 48 -hour notification shall be required to schedule the test. 16. When these systems are complete, provide a 2" main drain test. Complete a 2" main drain test form and provide this form to the Northbrook Fire Prevention Bureau. A minimum of 48 -hour notification shall be required to schedule the test. 17. When the systems are complete, provide wet/dry inspector's test. Dry pipe systems shall produce water in less than 60 seconds. Complete the inspector's test form and provide this form to the Northbrook Fire Prevention Bureau. A minimum of 48 -hour notification shall be required to schedule the test. 18. All control, drain, and test connection valves shall be provided with permanently marked weatherproof metal or rigid plastic identification signs. The signs shall be secured with corrosion resistant wire, chain, or other approved means. BOCA 906.8 NFPA 13 6 7.4 19. Piping between the exterior fire department connection and the check valve in the fire department inlet pipe shall be hydrostatically tested in the same manner as the balance of the system. BOCA 906.9.2 NFPA 13 1.6.2.1.10 20. Signage of a durable material with lettering no less than 1" in height shall be provided at the fire department connection indicating the address range that a specific fire department connection serves. BOCA 916.8 Municipal Ordinance 916.8 NFPA 13 8.16.2.4.7 21. Fire Department connections shall be located and shall be visible on a street front or in a location appioved by the Fire Department. Indicate the following for the fire department connection (FDC): A. located between eighteen and forty- two -two inches (18 "-42 ") above grade; B. has threads compatible with the fire department operations; and C. has a ball drip and check valve. BOCA Section 916.3,-916.4 NFPA 13, Section 8.16.2 22. All indicating control valves shall be provided with supervision with the installation of tamper switches connected to the fire alarm system supervisor side of the system. NFR4 13 3.14.10, 8.15.1.1.1.2 23. The water flow test information provided in the hydraulic calculations is not acceptable. Provide current water test data, or contact the Northbrook Water Department to schedule a flow test. IFC Section 508 NFPA 13, Section 14.4 24. Provide a minimum 10% or 5 psi (whichever is greater) safety factor in the hydraulic calculations. Municipal Ordinance 9062.1 25. All system valves and gauges shall be accessible for operations, inspection, tests and maintenance. NFPA 13, Section 8.1.2 26. Indicate a hydraulic data nameplate on the riser. NFPA 13, Section 165 27. All occupancies of Use Groups "A, B, E, F, H, I, M ", shall provide the following: Sprinkler and fire pump rooms. 2 -hour fire rated enclosure with an automatic fire suppression system with both an outside door at grade and inside door access. When below grade the room shall be adjacent to a rated stairwell enclosure. Municipal Ordinance 302.1.1.8, IFC Section 913.6 2S. All buildings over two stories shall be provided with floor control valves with monitored water flow switches on each floor. . Municipal Ordinance 906.1 29. The fire pump test header shall terminate at the exterior building wall. Municipal Ordinance 906.11 30. All new underground water mains shall be flushed, chlorinated, and hydrostatically tested in . accordance with NFPA 24 requirements. O/Ld 6 -0, 5--6 &-- 6 / ,P, 4 e6 /3 31. It is the recommendation of the Fire Prevention Bureau that high or intermediate type automatic sprinklers are located in all areas within a 5 foot radius of heat producing appliances. 32. The main drain shall discharge to the outside of the building. Where this is not possible, the floor drain shall be capable of handling a full discharge from the main drain. NFPA 13 8.1.5.26 33. Provide a double detector check on the incoming water supply piping. If chemicals are utilized (such as anti- freeze) provide a reduced pressure back -flow preventor. State of Illinois Plumbing Code requirement. 34. Posts, fences, vehicles, growth, trash and storage shall not be placed or kept near fire hydrants or fire department connections. A minimum clear space of 3 feet shall be provided around the circumference of the fire hydrant, fire department connection, and other required valves and equipment. IFC 508 35. Provide a fire alarm contractor shop drawing for review. Shop drawings shall indicate all fire alarm devices, wiring diagram, point -to -point wiring, material catalog cut sheets, battery back up calculations and voltage drop calculations. BOCA Section 918,2, 918.6,.918.7 NFPA 72 4.4.4.2, 4.5.1, Chapter 14 36. Install audio /visual devices in accordance with the Illinois Accessibility Code and NFPA 72 requirements. All audio /visual and visual only devices shall be synchronized. IFC Section 907.2 37. Fire alarm horn/strobes shall be located so as to be effectively heard above all other sounds, by all occupants, in every occupied space within the tenant space. BOCA Section 918.8.2, 918.8.1 38. Provide an addressable fire alarm control panel and remote annunciator panel. Non - addressable control units are not permitted. Municipal Ordinance 907.1.2.1 39. The fire alarm shall be monitored by "RED Center" or a UL listed central station. Provide a listing certificate for proposed UL listed Central Station. BOCA Section 924.1, 924.2 40. Fire alarm manual pull stations shall be located per NFPA 72, not more than 5' from an exit, maximum of 54" and minimum 42" in height. BOCA Section 918.5.1, IFC Section 907.4.1, NFPA 72, Section 5.12 41. Provide a fire alarm device key plan on the drawing. NFPA 72, Chapter 14 42. Final approval of the installation shall be subject to a 100% system acceptance test to be witnessed by the fire department. A minimum of 48 -hour notification shall be required to schedule the test. BOCA Section 918.2, 918.10, 919.5, IFC Section 907. 1.1 43. The fire alarm contractor shall provide two representatives at each alarm test, equipped with communication devices. A minimum of 48 -hours notification shall be required to schedule the test. BOCA Section 113, 918.10 44. The fire alarm system shall sound a "temporal pattern" in accordance with NFPA 72 requirements. BOCA Section 918.2 NFPA 72, Section 4.4.3.1, 6.8.64 45. All fire protective-signaling systems required by this Code or voluntarily installed by the owner of the building or structure shall be equipped with a wireless system operating on radio transmissions and shall be fully compatible with the receiving equipment at the owner's selected private central station or the fire department's emergency signal receiving equipment at its central r Ox, answering point, as applicable. Any such system shall comply with the requirements of this Section 917.00 and such other technical standards as are necessary and required by the code official. The requirements of this section shall apply only to new fire protective signaling systems for which a building permit is issued after August 25, 2001, unless otherwise provided by this Code. Municipal Ordinance 918.1.1 46. Provide an exterior /outdoor weatherproof audio /visual device and all associated mounting hardware above the fire department connection. Municipal Ordinance 906.5 47. Provide a smoke detector (or heat detection where a smoke detector is prohibited due to ambient conditions) above the fire alarm control panel. NFPA 72, Section 4.4.5 48. Provide a zone map at the fire alarm control panel and by each remote annunciator panel. NFPA 72, Section 4.4.6 49. All fire alarm systems shaU be of the point addressable type. Municipal Ordinance F- 907.1.2.1 50. A fire alarm system shall be.installed in full operating condition in all use groups. Fire alarms shall be provided in such a manner as to be seen and heard in all areas of every building. Municipal Ordinance 918.4 51. Fire protection equipment shall be identified in an approved manner. Rooms containing controls for air- conditioning systems, sprinkler risers and valves, or other fire detection, suppression or control elements shall be identified for the use of the fire department. Approved signs required to identify fire protection equipment and equipment location, shall be constructed of durable materials, permanently installed and readily visible. IFC Section 510 52. Provide a section view of the project device heights for review. It cannot be determined from the submitted drawings if the following devices are located according to NFPA 72, (smoke/heat detectors), (manual pull stations), (audio /visual devices). 53. Provide revised battery calculations and voltage drop calculations for review. 54. Revise the locations of the audio /visual devices. Per NFPA 72, wall mounted audio /visual devices shall not be more than 15' from the end of a corridor and not more than 100' apart. . NFPA 72 7.5.4.2.5 55. In buildings with an atrium, smoke detectors shed] be installed in accordance with this section and one or both of the following methods: 1. Spot -type detectors shall be installed at the atrium- ceiling and the underside of projections and perimeter spaced according with their listing. 2. Projected beam -type smoke detectors shall be installed and spaced hi accordance with their listing. IFC 907.2.13 56. All audio /visual devices shall be synchronized. ADA requirement. 57. Provide a smoke detector above the remote power supply. NFPA 72, Section 4.4.5. 58. Plans and specifications for the hood and duct fire suppression system shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the installation of the system. Final approval of the installation shall 0.4 0 — &'<J -- be subject to a system acceptance test to be witnessed by the fire department. A minimum of 48- hour notification shall be required to schedule the test. BOCA Section 113, 914.2, 914.5 NFPA 17A Chapter 4 59. Final approval of the installation shall be subject to a system acceptance test to be witnessed by the fire department. A minimum of 48 -hour notification shall be required to schedule the test. BOCA Section 113, 914.5 60. The wet chemical containers shall be located in an area not subject to severe weather conditions, mechanical, chemical or other damage. The containers shall be located where they will be easy to inspect, maintain and service. NFPA 17A, Section 3 -4 61. A K Class wet chemical portable fire extinguisher shall be provided in the kitchen area within 30 feet of each hood being protected. NFPA 10 62. The actuation of the fire suppression system shall automatically shut down the fuel and electrical supply and make -up air supply to the cooking equipment. The fuel and electrical supply shall be reset by a manual means of activation. IMC 508.3 63. The fire suppression system shall be connected to the building fire alarm system. Municipal Ordinance 924.1,IFC Section 907.14.1 64. Wet chemical discharge warning signs and a discharge alarm shall be provided. BOCA Section 914.4 65. A minimum of 16 -inch separation or equivalent protection is required between the fryers and surface flames. 66. A manual actuation station shall be located at or near a means of egress from the cooking area, a minimum of 10 feet from the kitchen exhaust system. The actuation device shall be located a minimum of 4 feet above the floor. NFPA 17A, Section 3 -2 BOCA Section 914.3 67. All hood and duct suppression systems are required to have semi - annual inspections by an authorized agent. Service tags are to be current and located on the cylinders and remote pull station. Certificate of Service is to be kept on file at the place of business for inspection purposes. IFC Section 904.5 68. Exhaust outlets that terminate above the roof shall have the discharge opening located not less than 40 inches above the roof surface. IMC Section 5063.13.1 69. Exhaust outlets shall be located not less than 10 feet (3048 mm) horizontally from parts of the same or contiguous buildings, adjacent property lines and air intake openings into any building and shall be located not less than 10 feet (3048.mm) above the adjoining grade level. Exceptions: o 1. Exhaust outlets shall terminate not less than 5 feet (1524 mLn) from an adjacent building, adjacent property line and air intake openings into a building where air from the exhaust outlet discharges away from such locations. 2. The minimum horizontal distance between vertical discharge fans and parapet - type building structures shall be 2 feet (6 10 mm) provided that such structures are not higher than the top of the fan discharge opening. IMC Section 506.3.13.3 t�. 6 ��a .7 �� r 70. Provide dimensions on the drawing for purposes of review. This includes all appliances, hood/s, duct/s, and nozzle. heights. BOCA Section 914.2 71. Provide a sealed or dimensioned site plan for the kitchen area to indicate fire extinguisher location, the exit ways, and the location of the manual pull station. BOCA Section 914.2 NFPA 17A - Chapter 4 72. Provide informational tags on the drawing to indicate nozzle types, appliances, pull station, etc. BOCA Section 914.2 NFPA 17A - Chapter 4 73. The activation of the kitchen hood wet chemical suppression system shall activate and sound a local alarm. NFPA Section 17 - 3.2 74. All joints, seams, and penetrations of grease ducts shall be liquid tight. IMC Section 5063.3 75. All grease duct systems shall have an 18 -inch clearance from any combustible construction. IMC Section 506 3.7 76. Provide a listed clean -out for the grease duct. IMC Section 506.3.9 77. Provide a detail of mechanical drawings for the kitchen hood and duct system. 78. Provide a drawing indicating the location/placement of all emergency lighting units and exit signs for review. BOCA Section 1023, 1024 79. Provide a material catalog cut sheet for all new emergency lighting units for review. All devices used shall comply with BOCA Section 1023.2. 80. To assure continued illumination for a duration of not less than 90 minutes in case of primary power loss, the exit signs shall be connected to a battery operated emergency power source that complies with the National Electrical Code. BOCA Section 1023.4, 1024.4 81. Provide "Means of Egress" lighting in all buildings, rooms or spaces required to have more than one exit or exit access. BOCA Section 1024.4 82. Exit sign lettering shall be red in color, at least 6 inches in height, and the minimum width of each stroke shall be 3/4 inch on a white background. BOCA Section 10 83. It is the recommendation of the Northbrook Fire Prevention Bureau that emergency lights in compliance with the National Electrical Code be installed in each bathroom. 84. The means of egress, including the exit discharge, shall be illuminated at all times. Proved emergency light in the following areas: a. Exit access corridors, passageways, and aisles in rooms and spaces which require two or more means of egress. b. Exit access corridors and exit stairways located in buildings required to have two or more exits. C. Interior exit discharge elements. d. The portion of the exterior exit discharge immediately adjacent to exit discharge doorways. IFC 1003.2.1 85. Fire extinguishers shall be provided as required by Code. BOCA Section 921, NFPA 10 4, 6 /,�. g �,6 r 3 86. All cooking and food preparation centers are,required to shall have at least one fire extinguisher listed specifically for cooking operations. This extinguisher is to have a minimum classification rating of a K classification or 20 BC (where grease is not present). NFPA 10 87. Provide a drawing indicating the fire extinguisher size, type, and layout/placement for review and comment. IFC Section 906 88. Portable fire extinguishers not exceeding 40 lbs. Shall be installed so that the handle is located not more than 5 -feet (60 inches) above the floor, and fire extinguishers exceeding 40 lbs. Shall be installed so that the handle is located not more than 3.5 feet (42 inches) above the floor. The clearance between the floor and extinguisher shall be more than 4 inches. 89. Smoke detectors shall be installed in supply air systems with a design capacity greater than 2000 cfm's downstream of the air filters and ahead of any branch connections. The smoke detectors shall be connected to a fire protective signaling system. The actuation of a smoke detector shall activate a visible and audible alarm signal at a constantly attended location.. IMC Section 513.12, NFPA Section 5.7 90. -Provide duct smoke detection systems in all supply /return mechanical units as required by NFPA Standards. All duct detection shall have local test and reset functions located as approved by the Division of Fire Prevention. IMC Section 515 NFPA Section 5.7 91. The fire code official shall require and designate public and private fire lanes as deemed necessary for the efficient and effective operation of fire apparatus. Fire lanes shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13' 6 ". All fire lanes required by the code official shall be enforceable by the police agency having jurisdiction through an agreement with that police agency and the Northbrook Fine Department. IFC 503.2.1 Required fire lanes shall be maintained free of obstructions and vehicles and shall be marked in a manner approved by the fire code official. All required fire lane signs or markings shall be maintained in a clean and legible condition at all times and replaced when necessary to ensure adequate visibility. (See attached Fire Lane Agreements.) 92. Fire department access shall be provided and maintained to all structures undergoing construction, alteration, or demolition. Fire department access roadways shall be of an approved surface material capable of providing emergency vehicle access and support at all times, and shall be a minimum of 20 feet in unobstructed width. The access roadways shall provide a minimum turning radii capable of accommodating the largest fire apparatus of the Northbrook Fire Department and a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches. Pre -plans assist suppression personnel with the buildings operational features which reduces property loss. For fire department use in its pre -plan operations site and floor plan drawings, as designated by this department, will be required to be digitized at a vendor selected by the fire department, or if compatible, plans that are on disk (DXF File Format for print out not larger than 8 1/2 x 11) for our use is also acceptable. Any costs involved in this process will be that of the owner /developer of the building(s). IFC Section 503 93. An approved fire apparatus access road shall be provided and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the building. IFC Section 503.1 OAd 94. Dead -end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus: IFC 503.2.5 95. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (6096 mm), except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6 and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (4115 mm). ➢ The code official shall have the authority to require an increase in the minimum access widths where they are inadequate for fire or rescue operations. ➢ Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all- weather driving capabilities. ➢ The required turning radius of a fire apparatus road shall be determined by the code official. Contact the Village of Northbrook Fire Prevention Bureau for emergency vehicle turning radius templates. ➢ -Dead -end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45 720 mm) in length shall be provided with an approved area for turnmg around fira apparatus. ➢ The grade of the fire apparatus access road shall be within the limits established by the code official based on fire department's apparatus IFC 503.2 96. Where required by the code official, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads or prohibit the obstruction thereof. Signs or notices shall be maintained in a clean and legible condition at all times and be replaced or repaired when necessary to provide adequate visibility. Contact the Village of Northbrook Fire. Prevention Bureau for a fire lane application. IFC 503.3 97. An assembly occupancy load shall be posted with an approved legible sign in contrasting colors conspicuously located near the main point of egress. The owner shall be responsible for installing and maintaining such signs. BOCA Section 1003.3 98. All doors in the means of egress with an occupancy load greater than 50, shall swing in the direction of egress. BOCA Section 1017.4, 1014.8.2, 1017.4 99. All doors equipped with latching devices in assembly occupancies with an occupant load greater than 49 shall be equipped with approved panic hardware. Municipal Ordinance 1017.4.2 100. Egress doors shall be readily openable from the egress side without the use of a key or special knowledge or effort. Exceptions: 1. Places of detention or restraint. 2. Ili buildings in occupancy Group A having an occupant load of 300 or less, Groups B, F., M and S, and in churches, the main exterior door or doors is permitted to be equipped with key- operated locking devices from the egress side provided: 2.1 The locking device is readily distinguishable as locked. 2.2 A readily visible durable sign is posted on the egress side on or adjacent to the door stating: THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. The sign shall be in letters 1 inch (25 mm) high on a contrasting background. 2.3 The use of the key- locking device is revokable by the code official for due cause. - 3 ld l J . Where egress doors are used in pairs, approved automatic flush bolts shall be permitted to be used, provided that the door leaf having the automatic flush bolts has no doorknob or surface - mounted hardware. The unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. 4. Doors from individual dwelling units and guestrooms of Group R occupancies having an occupant load of 10 or less are permitted to be equipped with a night latch, dead bolt or security chain, provided such devices are openable from the inside without the use of a key or tool. 5. Doors allowed to have an electric strike locking system shall incorporate a lock system. This system is to include, but not limited to: 5.1 Connection to the building's fire alarm which will disconnect the lock system upon any alarm. 5.2. Electrical power failure to the lock system. 5.3 Emergency "panic" button release within three (3) feet of the door. Activation of the button would release the lock system within 15 seconds or as required by the Fire. Code Official Signage stating operation of the emergency button would be required adjacent to the button location. Municipal Ordinance .1003.3.1.8 101. Per NFPA 13 requirements, storage cannot exceed 8 -feet or 18- inches from the top of the sprinkler deflector (whichever is most restrictive). A 3 -inch red line shall be painted to identify "No Storage Above this Line ". 102. An emergency key box (Knox Box) shall be provided for the facility. The key box system provides fire suppression personnel with access to the buildings utility areas (sprinkler, electrical and mechanical rooms, etc.) The key box shall be mounted at a height no higher than 60" above finished grade and no more than 24" below non sprinkled ceiling, by the fire department connection or as directed by the fire department. The key box will be used by the fire service personnel for emergency access only. If a fire alarm system is present, the knox box must be of the monitored type. IFC Section 506 103. Pre -plans assist suppression personnel with the buildings operational features which reduces property loss. For fire department use in its pre -plan operations site and floor plan drawings, as designated by this department, will be required to be digitized at a vendor selected by the fire department, or if compatible, plans that are on disk (AutoCad 12 DWG File Format for print out not larger than 8 1/2 x 11) for our use is also acceptable. Any costs involved in this process will be that of the owner /developer of the building(s). 104. Provide a scaled site plan showing all existing and new underground piping, pipe sizes, fire hydrant locations and site of water flow test. Provide a hydrant not greater than 100 feet from the fire department connection. Provide fire hydrants spaced at not greater than 300 feet around the perimeter of the building. 105. The proposed location of the fire department connection is acceptable, however, a fire lane shall be established in #accordance with the Village of Northbrook requirements. Contact the Northbrook Fire Prevention Bureau for additional information. 106. No pipe smaller than 6 inches in diameter shall be installed as a private water main. NFPA 24 107. Fire hydrant systems shall comply with Sections 508.5.1 through 508.5.6. Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by.an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on -site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the code official. U ,a� U _ v S 1 S, 6�. 6 /a, r/ t ,3 Exceptions: 1. For Group R -3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). 2. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet (183 m). IFC 508.5 108. A 3 -foot (914 ,mm) clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants except as otherwise required or approved. Where fire hydrants are subject to impact by a motor vehicle, guard posts or other approved means shall comply with Section 312. IFC Section 508 109. All fire hydrants shall be flagged. This flagging shall be reviewed for compliance with Village of Northbrook requirements. 110. All fire hydrant steamer connection caps shall be painted. A. Fire hydrants.in excess of 1500 GPM shall be painted fight blue. B. Fire hydrants between 1000 and 1,499 GPM shall be painted green. C. Fire hydrants between 500 and 999 GPM shall be painted. orange. D. Fire hydrant less than 500 GPM shall be painted red. Contact Joe Ravagni with the Village of Northbrook Public Works Department. for additional information. 111. The proposed location of the fire department connection is not acceptable. The fire department .connection shall face the street at the following location: 112. Vehicle protection shall be provided as follows: Posts. Guard posts shall comply with all of the following requirements: 1. Constructed of.steel not less than 4 inches (102m) in diameter and concrete filled. 2. Spaced not more than 4 feet (1219mm) between posts on center. 3. Set not less than 3 feet (914mm) deep in a concrete footing of not less than a 15 -inch (381mm) diameter. 4. Set with the top of the posts not less than 3 feet (914mm) above ground. 5. Located not less than 3 feet (914mm) from the protection object. IFC Section 312.2 11.3. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers, or approved building identification placed in a position to be plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Address numbers shall be Arabic numerals or alphabet letters. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches (102 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch (12.7 mm). IFC 505.1 114. 115 116 The installing contractor shall maintain a stamped "Approved" set of drawings in the field/site at all times during installation and construction. BOCA Section 113, 114 Seal all penetrations in wall and ceiling assemblies in accordance with BOCA and material listing. BOCA Section 714 Storage of aboveground fuel tanks are prohibited. Municipal Ordinance 3404.2 4- ,6 to . z6 r 3 117. Fire doors shall be self - closing or automatic- closing in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 80. Provide additional information and/or provide rated doors per BOCA Table, 717.1, closer, and hardware on the following doors: 118. The general contractor shall have the following labeled keys at the time of final inspection. a. Main doors. b. Fire Alarm. C. . Sprinkler room. Village of Northbrook requirement 119. Provide two labeled sets of master keys for this tenant space. These keys shall be placed into an existing secure knox box to assist the fire department in the event of an emergency.. Northbrook requirement. Based on the information provided the plans are "CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ". Please contact the Bureau office at (847) 272 -2141 X -130, if you have any questions or comments. A minimum of 48 hour notification shall be required to schedule all inspections. Sincerely, O Anthony J. Lewis Director of Fire Prevention a JL /dka cc: J. Hansen, Deerfield Building & Zoning PRO 11205A File DandersoafWord /Q/PlauReviews2005/PR011205A — 1085 Lake Cook — Hellenic American Academy of CWcagoland �� , 6 la, i3 �, �7) TRAFFIC PLANNING STUDY To: Mr. Mark Ridolphi Chinch Building Consultants, Inc. From: Daniel P. Brinkman, P.E., PTO Date: February 8, 2005 Revised February 17, 2005 Subject: Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland 1085 Lake Cook Road Deerfield, Illinois GEWALT HAMiLToN ASSOCIATE'S, INC. Consulting Engineers and Surveyors Civil, Municipal, & Traffic 850 Forest Edge Drive Vernon Hills, Illinois 60061 tel 847 478 9700 fax 847 478 9701 PART 1. PROJECT CONTEXT AND SUMMARY STATEMENT GEWALT HAMELToN ASSOCIATES, INC. (GHA) has investigated the traffic planning requirements of the proposed Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland (HAAC) development. The private, religious school will remodel and occupy the former State Farm Insurance building at 1085 Lake Cook Road. The approximately, 5 -acre subject site is located at the southeast corner of the Pine Street intersection with Lake Cook Road in the Village of Deerfield, Illinois (see Exhibit 1). The HAAC is to be formed by a combination of two smaller existing Greek Orthodox schools, Socrates Greek American School and The Plato School. At the proposed opening for the 2005 -2006 school year or Phase I, enrollment is expected to be approximately 160 students. The maximum capacity of the remodeled building is 244 students. The maximum capacity of the expanded (Phase Il) will be 262 students. Our study findings are discussed below and various recommendations are offered for your consideration. Exhibits referenced in the text are centrally located in the Technical Addendum at the end of this report. Briefly summarizing, we believe that the adjacent roadways can accommodate the anticipated development traffic through the implementation of recommended Traffic Operations Plan. Reasons include... ® All of our analyses are based on the maximum capacity of Phase H. ® Direct signalized access to a major regional arterial immediately north of the site. © Availability of public and private bus service to help minimize individual vehicle usage. ® Planned roadway improvements will assist in addressing an existing deficiency. © Given the 9:00 am start and 3:00 pm end time for classes, only portions of the school peaks; estimated at 70% of the morning and 25% of the afternoon, will coincide with the observed Morning 4 and Evening Peak Hours. © Site has been designed to provide efficient circulation in a counter clockwise direction to help minimize congestion during the critical pick -up / drop -off periods. 04-44 0 -v�-- 6 l3 Hellenic American Academy of Chtcagolan d 1085 Lake Cook Road ' Deerfield, IL PART 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Roadway Network Discussion IN Lake Cook Road is a major east -west route in the site vicinity under the jurisdiction of the Cook County Highway Department (CCHD). Lake Cook is classified as a Strategic Regional Arterial (SRA) route. Lake Cook generally provides two travel lanes in each direction with a center median. Separate 10 eastbound and westbound left turn lanes have been "carved" into the median at its signalized intersection with Pine Street. Lake Cook Road has a posted speed limit of 45 -mph along the site frontage. Pine Street is a local north -south route under the jurisdiction of the Village of Deerfield. South of Lake Cook, Pine Street is actually on the site of he recently approved Chicagoland Jewish High School (CJHS) site. Through traffic (i.e. crossing Lake Cook Road) is not permitted on either of the north or 14 south approaches. A raised island restricts the south leg traffic to right or left turns only, while only signage exists for the north leg. Approximately 100 feet south of Lake Cook Road, there is an internal intersection that serves the office development to the west, and the 1085 Lake Cook building to the east. This north -south frontage road intersection provides two northbound lanes approaching Lake Cook and a single lane in each direction on the other three legs of the intersection. Inbound traffic (i.e. entering from Lake Cook) does not stop, but the balance of the intersection is under Stop Sign control. Currently, a barrier, boulevard_ style median exists on the south approach that will be removed as part of the CJHS site development to the south. The HAAC building will maintain the existing connections to the CJHS access roadway through the existing access easements that exist. Exhibit 2 provides a photo inventory of current operations at the internal Frontage Road intersection. 14 Appendix I provides an April 2002 aerial photograph of the site and surrounding development at the time. Note that both the CJHS and HAAC property borders are highlighted. Planned / Proposed Roadway Improvements The CCHD has a series of programmed improvements slated for 2006 construction in the site vicinity, including: 1. Reconstruction of Lake Cook from Pfingsten Road to the bridge section east of Pine 2. Signalization of the Birchwood / Frontage intersection west of the site 3. Extending turn lanes at the Lake Cook / Wilmot intersection The most critical to the site of these improvements is the signalized intersection proposed at Birchwood. A signal at that location has the potential to attract some of the westbound left turns from Pine that may be destined to offices between Pine at the next signal at Wilmot that are avoiding a left turn at that currently unsignalized location. Gewalt Hamilton Associates, In . A— 'P'age 2 Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland 1085 Lake Cook Road Deerfield, IL Added to the CCHD program as part of the CJHS development immediately south of the subject site was: • Extend westbound left turn lane from its current length of 150 feet to 300 feet. • Modify the existing traffic signals at Pine Street to allow Right turn overlaps onto Lake Cook Road. Background Traffic GHA conducted weekday morning and evening peak period traffic counts in March 2004 for the study prepared for the CJHS development. The time periods were chosen so as to coincide with the highest combination of background and anticipated development - generated traffic. Exhibit 3 illustrates the existing 2004 peak hour volumes, which occurred from 7:30 -8:30 am and from 4:30 -5:30 pm. Those peaks will be used as a basis for our analyses. ® -No unusual delays occurred during the 2004 counts -such as foul weather (e.g. heavy snowfall or rain), road construction, or emergency vehicle activity that would adversely affect the. volumes or travel patterns. Supplemental observations of traffic in the site vicinity during January 2005 concur that the March 2004 traffic count data remains accurate and that no additional or updated counts are necessary. PART 3. PROJECT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Traffic Generations Typically, the anticipated traffic volumes for a development are based on information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the manual Trip Generation. However, (as with the CJHS I� development that preceded it) there is a lack of published trip generation information for a private school such as is proposed. Therefore, we have based our anticipated traffic volumes for the school on j information collected from the staff at HAAC (see Appendix 11). Tabulated in Part A of Exhibit 4 is a breakdown of the anticipated travel method of each of the projected i� 262 students and 28 staff (maximum student capacity after expansion). Based on information provided (� by HAAC, roughly 85% of the student traffic is expected to arrive by parent car. The balance of students will likely arrive via public transit or the single private bus that will be made available. °° Based on our observations at public schools, we expect that all staff will arrive in private cars. As previously noted, the 9:00 am and 3:00 pm start and end time for classes minimize the impacts during the established Peak Hours in the site vicinity. Based on our observations at other schools and information published by the ITE with respect to public schools, we would expect that approximately 70% of the morning traffic generated_by HAAC and 25% of the afternoon traffic would coincide with the existing "street" peak hours. Part A also tabulates the anticipated Peak Hour trips generated by the CJHS development as presented in the May 2004 traffic study by GHA., As can be seen, the proposed HAAC is expected to generate about 175 Morning Peak Hour trips and 72 Evening Peak Hour trips at full capacity (262 students versus the 158 expected at opening). Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. — Page 3 0.4-Y o 0 5-- 6 A/- A i:1.3 ?K / 3 ii Trip Distribution Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland 1085 Lake Cook Road Deerfield, IL 7 Part B of Exhibit 4 summarizes the anticipated directional distribution of HAAC traffic. Based on the anticipated student population areas and arrival methods, we expect that slightly more traffic will be destined to and from the east along Lake Cook Road. Use of the Frontage Road to the west and Pine Street to the north by HAAC traffic is expected to be negligible. Recall, north south movements are prohibited at Pine Street. Property Access The HAAC site will continue to utilize the existing site driveways that served the former insurance building. However, to help minimize the impacts during the overlapping peak hours and improve both safety and efficiency at the frontage road intersection, we have recommended that site operate with a counter clockwise circulation pattern. Inbound traffic will enter the HAAC site south of the frontage road at the existing drive and exit via the existing east leg of the internal intersection. Appendix III presents the proposed site plan prepared by Church Building Consultants dated January 27, 2005. PART 4. EVALUATION Traffic Assignments Exhibit 5 illustrates the traffic that was estimated for the CJHS development by GHA in our May 2004 study. Exhibit 6 illustrates the "Baseline" traffic volumes resulting from the combination of CJHS traffic with the Background volumes presented in Exhibit 3. Traffic generated by the proposed HAAC school was "assigned" to the adjacent roadways based on the project characteristics (see Exhibit 4) and the site's access system and is illustrated in Exhibit 7. HAAC traffic was then combined with the Baseline volumes (see Exhibit 6) to yield the future traffic assignment, which is presented, in Exhibit 8. Intersection Capacity Analyses Capacity analyses were conducted at the key Lake -Cook / Pine Street intersection. The analysis parameters are listed in Exhibit 9, as published in the Transportation Research Board's (TRB) 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). At signalized intersections, Level of Service (LOS) reports operations using the letter designations. "A" (best) through "F" (worst) and measures the average control delay per, vehicle in seconds. Usually, LOS C is referred to as providing "design" operations and LOS D is the lower threshold of "acceptable" operations. LOS E and F are usually considered as being "unacceptable ". At unsignalized intersections, the HCM methodology reports the results differently for Two -Way Stop Controlled (TWSC) or All -Way Stop Controlled (AWSC) intersections. For TWSC intersections, LOS is reported for conflicting movements on the major street (i.e. left turns onto the minor approach) and for each movement on the stopped approach. Approach "control delay" is also reported in seconds per vehicle. Results of AWSC analyses are slightly different. LOS is reported for each stopped approach as well as an average overall intersection "control delay" in seconds per vehicle. LOS C and D continue to be considered "design" and "acceptable" operations respectively. Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. — Page 4 Drcc1 it Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland 1085 Lake Cook Road Deerfield, IL The current travel lanes and traffic signal timings were used as the "base" for testing. Various g eometric improvements (e.g. adding travel lanes) and bperational.modifications (e.g. traffic signal timing changes) ;. were considered, as necessary. Exhibit 9 summarizes the results. Currently, the north and south approaches experience some significant delays during the Peak Hours. However, overall intersection operations at the Lake Cook Road / Pine Street intersection operate at or better than the design LOS C during the peak hours tested. Without improvements, the additional traffic generated by the school developments would continue to result in unacceptable delays for the entering left turns (AM Peak) and exiting right turns (PM Peak), while the overall intersection would continue to operate acceptably (i.e. LOS D or better). However, as previously discussed, CCHD has added the following to its planned improvements along Lake Cook Road for the 2006 construction season: • Extending the existing westbound left turn lane • Modifying the signal operations to allow northbound right turns when east and westbound traffic has a green left arrow (right turn overlap). These regional improvements will allow all individual movements to operate acceptably, with one exception: southbound left turns from Pine Street to eastbound Lake Cook Road will continue to operate at LOS E during the morning peak hour. Recall that this is the current LOS for that movement and that neither school project will add traffic to that particular movement. t With the regional improvements determined, our analyses shifted focus to the HAAC site entrance. Based on our analyses, it is anticipated that inbound left turns (across exiting CJHS) traffic will be readily accommodated by the planned widening of the CJHS access south of the H.AAC site. We recommend that striping of the "middle" lane on the driveway be coordinated.to allow for southbound left turns into the HAAC site. Traffic Operations Plan Exhibit 10 schematically illustrates the recommended traffic operations plan. The improvements will be designed to meet CCHD and Village standards. Key traffic plan elements and those entities responsible for the improvements include... • Extend the westbound left turn lane from its current length of 150 feet to 300 feet. [CCHD] • Modify existing traffic signal timing and phasing at the Lake Cook / Pine Street intersection. [CCHD] • Widen the south leg of the frontage road intersection to provide two northbound lanes. [CJHS] • Coordinate with CJHS to ensure striping of planned access allows for southbound left turns. [HAAC] f • A one -way counterclockwise circulation pattern will be utilized on -site. [HAAC] Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. — Page 5 D n Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland 1085 Lake Cook Road Deerfield, IL PART 5. SITE PLAN ELEMENTS Site Circulation As previously discussed, a one -way circulation pattern will be put in place on site. The existing driveways and internal aisle widths should be sufficient for the anticipated traffic volumes and travel patterns. As the site exists and was previously operated as a commercial building, it is reasonable to assume that emergency and service vehicles can enter, service and exit the site without difficulty. Parking The current site provides 132 parking spaces. A minor modification to the parking field will occur during Phase I to provide a drop off lane along the east side of the building will reduce the parking lot by r approximately 16 spaces, resulting in a total of 116 spaces. Based on the Village of Deerfield's zoning ordinance, the proposed HAAC school is required to provide parking at the rate of 2 spaces for every 3 teachers /staff and one per every 5 students: 2 spc / 3 teachers, employees = 23/3 * 2 = 15.3 =15 1 spc / 5 students = 244/5 = 48.8.(49) Village Code requires 15 +49 = 64 spaces And (basedon the greater demand oj) a proposed auditorium space: Auditorium @ 264 seats 1 space / 3 seats = 264/3 = 82 Village Code requires 82 (82 > 64) spaces. Therefore, the modified Phase I parking lot at 116 spaces is more than sufficient to meet the Village's requirements. As part of Phase II, the building will be expanded and a gymnasium / multi purpose room will be added. j The new parking requirements for the site will be: 2 spc / 3 teachers, employees = 28/3 * 2 = 18.67 = 19 lspc / 5 students = 262/5 = 52.4 (52) Village Code requires 19 +52 = 71 spaces Auditorium @ 264 seats 1 space / 3 seats = 264/3 = 82 Village Code requires 82 (82 > 71) spaces. Gymnasium / Multi Purpose Room 7,690 square feet 1 patron per 7 square feet (calculated occupancy of 1,099 persons 1 spc / 3 persons capacity 1,099/3 = 367 spaces Maximum calculated demand for Phase H = 367 spaces. A variation will be needed as the maximum number of spaces that can be provided on site is approximately 170 per the CBC plan. Cross parking agreements with the planned CHJS facility or other office buildings in the vicinity should be explored for peak parking demand dates. (� Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. — Page 6 v= oS- IS f ,4 Hellenic American Academy of Chicagoland 1085 Lake Cook Road Deerfield, IL PART 6. TECHNICAL ADDENDUM The following Exhibits were referenced. They provide technical support for our observations, findings, and recommendations discussed in the text. Exhibits. 1. Site Location Map 2. Photo Inventory 3. Background Traffic 4. Project Traffic Characteristics 5. CJHS Traffic 6. Baseline Traffic 7. HAAC Traffic 8. Future Traffic 9. Intersection Capacity Analyses 10. Traffic Operations Plan Appendices. I. Site Context (April 2002 aerial photo) II Traffic Characteristic Summary III. Site Plan (reduced to 11x17) IV. Capacity Analysis Printouts 3599.900 HAAC TPS- 021705.doc Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. — Page 7 Out.ci O'US-1S i �. 1 3 i TECHNWAL ADDENDUM Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. 0"" o -v5= IS e 0 1� xhibit I Site Location Map �i t II !I ii ! \;. i I I D Si Proposed HAAC Site CJHS LSite Mag 16.00 Tue Feb 08 07:24 2005 Scale 1:7,812 (at center) 500 Feet 200 Meters Local Road ® Major Connector Interstate /Unlimited Access Toll Highway - Railroad County Boundary Population Center Water 1 DeLorr �Qt9ffreef- --M.11 99X9= 010 GDT, Inc., Rel. 01/2001 Signalized intersectio 5�1 ,y �l r� z �a, � «� z - :� � � • � � � � « « <: v3 �&�A /�•2�%�� ��� \ "4 . � � C. o ,°n co '� 35 ®-- 1125 Lake -Cook Road ` NOT TO 20 SCALE o 10� t?5N to Frontage Road 2 20 Subject Site Future CJ HS Site II L.� Lie end: XX —AM Peak Hour (7:30 — 8:30 —PM Peak Hour (4:30 — 5:30 AM) PM) —Less Than 5 Vehicles I -EWALT HAMILTON Scurcee: GHA March 2004 Jan 2005 Exhibit ASS O C I A T E S, INC. Background Traffic Volume Da o - c5-15 cv_: -6 i3I ii ot 13 Exhibit 4 Project Traffic Characteristics -Helenic American Academy of Chicagoland 1085 Lake Cook Road - Deerfield, 111inbis Part A. Trip Generations Morning Peak Hour LE.,ePil a Pw riour HAAC Private Religious School (K-8) (7:30-8:30 am) In Out Sum (4:30-5:30 pm) Dui �� u fill HAAC 262 Students maximum Parent Pick-up / Drop-off Trips 113 113 226 113 113 226 226 students @ 2 / veh School begins at 9:00 am 70% during observed peak hour 80 80 160 FM i School ends at 3:00 pm 25% during no observed peak hour 28 28 56 Private Bus 1 1 2 1 21 o 36 Students HAAC Staff 28 28 0 28 0 28 28 50% of staff during observed peak hours 14 0 14 0 1 14 HAAC Trip Totals = 95 81 176 29 43 72 B. CJHS -1095 Lake Cook Road (2) 400 Students 132 37 169 r7 132 169 Part H. Trip Distribution Route Direction Percent Use Lake Cook Road East of Pine Street 55% West of Pine Street 45% Frontage Road West of Internal Intersection negligible Total = 100% (Votes: 1) Student and transportation information provided by HAAC 2) Traffic volumes per GHA May 21, 2004 study GEWALT HAMILTON ASSOCIATES, INC. lit 01a 0-05-- 0 rb 13 �J El Lake -C, Frontag • O ff tf� ��GEWALT HAMILT � ASSOCIATES IN . c Ilk � -J Leggnd. X —AM Peak Hour —PM Peak Hour oN Exhibit 5 CJHS Traffic (�. ( 0 -- 0 S- K 1 V' NOT TO SCALE Lake-Cook Road Frontage Road CJiI C EWALT HAMILT ASSOCIATES, INC. 20 IS(" 1930 21, 69 Ln r� m in' LO C'4 0 Cf) (m T— J t 20 co rL, 35 1160 268 t ca 4 Subject Site L I - 5Lege n d: XX —AM Peak Hour Hour —PM Peak Hour oN N NOT TO SCALE Exhibit 6 Baseline Traffic G.Ad 0 -_ 0 T_ 5 13. pq d�) M r7- Lake-0 PFF I Ll Frontag d A al Leaer "r XX d d GEWALT HAMILToN ASSOCIATES, INC. 10 J Exhibit 7 HC Traffic o"a 13,6 r6 NOT TO SCALE Us Lake-Cook Road Frontage Road mi I co 00 3-5 1160 320 20 1930 112 O NI N N ..*j 81 20 N to vim- a1 1 Le n�, kh gend: —AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Elm I IGEWALT HAMILMN ASSOCIATES, I N C. Eno; t L w 1-4 HA►C I I. L N NOT TO SCALE Exhibit 8 Future Traffic (),41 0_6-4S Cr 8 /3• 1 & r6 MA TWSC Intersection / tart Be Results Roadway Exhibit 9 Approach �Iasi Conditions 16tersacti ®n Capacity Analyses Westbound Northbound' Flelenic American Academy of Chicagoland 1085 Lake Cook Road - Deerfield, Illinois Delay I Part A. Parameters ° Type of Traffic Control (Source: 2000 Highway Capacity Manual) LT TH RT LT TH RT A. Traffic Signals S. Stop Sign LOS LOS Delay (sec / veh) Description LOS Delay (sec / veh) <_ 10 All signal phases clear waiting vehicles without delay <_ 10 A. Weekday Morning Peak Flour >10 and <_ 20 Minimal delay experienced on select signal phases >10 and <_ 15 >20 and <_ 35 Some delay experienced on several phases; often used as design criteria >15 and <_ 25 r >35 and <_ 55 Usually considered as the acceptable delay standard >25 and <_ 35 I_ - E E >55 and <_ 80 Very long delays experienced during the peak hours E >35 and <_ 50 Baseline Traffic (See Exhibit 6) 'r >80 Unacceptable delays experienced throughout the peak hours F >50 ■ NNW M� 0 • TWSC Intersection / tart Be Results Roadway LOS Per Movement By Approach Approach Conditions Eastbound Westbound Northbound' Southbound Delay I • As Planned LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT (sec /veh) LOS 1. Lake Cook Road @ Pine St Traffic Signal Intersection Delay A. Weekday Morning Peak Flour a As Planned - Background Traffic (See Exhibit 3) •Current I_ - E E - E tt. i B Baseline Traffic (See Exhibit 6) ® As Planned A. 1_� < r r, C E - D Future Traffic (See Exhibit 8) • As Planned _ _ C E C, 3 ":3 D B. Weekday Afternoon Peak Flour Background Traffic (See Exhibit 3) • Current E E E - E Baseline Traffic (See Exhibit 6) o As Planned: Future Traffic (See Exhibit 8) . As Planned 2. CJIiS Access @ HAAC Access TWSC Southbound Approach Delay A. Weekday Morning Peak Flour Future Traffic (See Exhibit 8) • As Planned {. B. Weekdav Afternoon Peak Flour Future Traffic (See Exhibit 8) a As Planned - GEWALT HAMILTON ASSOCIATES, INC. O./Ld -��- ►5 ,313.0r6 13 =e 11 CD C (s) ®I I II No�" NO Traffic Signal 1V NOT TO SCALE Existing Travel Lane Proposed Travel Lane HAAC Proposed Travel Lanes by Others I > Stop Sign -FLU Lake-Cook Road I Frontage Road ii I ® Extend Westbound left turn lane (CCHD) ® Modify traffic signal timing (CCHD) ® Provide 3 —lane section south of Frontage Road (CJHS) ® Inbound traffic operates "free— flow" Coordinate striping to allow SB left ' turns (HAAC) ' © One —Wzy counter clockwise travel pattern (HAAC) i�,e F] WALT HAMILTON ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 u =e 11 CD C (s) ®I I II No�" NO Traffic Signal 1V NOT TO SCALE Existing Travel Lane Proposed Travel Lane HAAC Proposed Travel Lanes by Others I > Stop Sign APPENDICES L Aerial Photo April 2002 II. Student and transportation information Al Reduced Site Plan by CBC IV. Highway Capacity Software (HCS) Summary Sheets Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. �3 f n b ��•, �ti r r �rai p o K r t q a ----------- ' •�M£lit..�. +t •+ W i. u~..w G3 t.4 'yi I ! { Y�- f t er45 T f� :Pi i iry t ,;3 Zh L , 41�f. IL V� t av i y{ y � ,1 J 3ai � - C� � r �4( 1 w V ) ' 'j'j`� ! FCC `75A' v I f -,z z V C � i 4 ' J h \ _ N 4 r a Richard C. Baker John W. Mauck Andy Norman MAUCK R ATTORNEYS AT LAW One North I.zSalle Street Suite zom. Lhicago,IL 6o6o2 Phone (3, 2) 7-6 -i243 Fax (312) 726 -1 o39 www.mauckbaker_com January 13,2005 VILA FACSIMILE: 630,690.9473 Mr. Mark Ridolphi 1825 College Avenue ( #130) Wheaton, IL 60187 Re: Traffic Control Information Requested Dear Mark: Attached please find a copy of the traffic control information you requested from Socrates Greek American School. In my phone conversation with Jim Logothetis this afternoon, he indicated that these numbers are based on some assumptions applied to the current enrollment at the Socrates Greek American School. First, there are currently one hundred and thirty -five ® students at its present site. The enrollment number for the 2005 -2006 school year, after possible merger with the Plato School and attrition from families who do not wish to make the move from {- Chicago to Deerfield'is one hundred and fifty- eight. Jim Logothetis has indicated that there will be a parent drop off rate of 85% no matter what the number of students and that only one bus will be serving the school per day. (I note that no numbers are generated for who will be attending programs after school but only what the actual after school activities are.) Please let me know immediately if there is any further information needed by the traffic controller. 1 would hope that we can have at least a preliminary study for discussion to bring to the preliminary meeting on January 27, 2005 with the Village of Deerfield. Please let me know if this i5 a reasonable expectation. Very truly yours, 71 I] TI Enclosure RCB:cls F,\Clicnu\ 3294\ Con, upondencc \LTRRidolphi0ii305_rcb.doc �1 Richard C. Baker n,c( 0-0`5_-)S v,13 0,,-Xlr6 /3 Richard S. Bell . Jason R. Craddock. Wendy K. Smith Writer's Direct Line: - (312) 853 -8708 rbaker ,mauckbnker.com MAUCK R ATTORNEYS AT LAW One North I.zSalle Street Suite zom. Lhicago,IL 6o6o2 Phone (3, 2) 7-6 -i243 Fax (312) 726 -1 o39 www.mauckbaker_com January 13,2005 VILA FACSIMILE: 630,690.9473 Mr. Mark Ridolphi 1825 College Avenue ( #130) Wheaton, IL 60187 Re: Traffic Control Information Requested Dear Mark: Attached please find a copy of the traffic control information you requested from Socrates Greek American School. In my phone conversation with Jim Logothetis this afternoon, he indicated that these numbers are based on some assumptions applied to the current enrollment at the Socrates Greek American School. First, there are currently one hundred and thirty -five ® students at its present site. The enrollment number for the 2005 -2006 school year, after possible merger with the Plato School and attrition from families who do not wish to make the move from {- Chicago to Deerfield'is one hundred and fifty- eight. Jim Logothetis has indicated that there will be a parent drop off rate of 85% no matter what the number of students and that only one bus will be serving the school per day. (I note that no numbers are generated for who will be attending programs after school but only what the actual after school activities are.) Please let me know immediately if there is any further information needed by the traffic controller. 1 would hope that we can have at least a preliminary study for discussion to bring to the preliminary meeting on January 27, 2005 with the Village of Deerfield. Please let me know if this i5 a reasonable expectation. Very truly yours, 71 I] TI Enclosure RCB:cls F,\Clicnu\ 3294\ Con, upondencc \LTRRidolphi0ii305_rcb.doc �1 Richard C. Baker n,c( 0-0`5_-)S v,13 0,,-Xlr6 /3 `NA .]an 11 2005 a.12PM SOCRATES SCHOOL 7738950000 p.2 OCRA E-5 GRmK AmERICAN SOHO ®L. 0>•H1nL`r TRINITY GREEK OP YHOOOX CHURCH FOUNDEn 1906 'WIsD0Af BEGINS /IV WOIYOER January 11, 2005 • Dear Mr. i.o gathcei 5, 5701 N. RedwaW Or. Chicago, tt e0631 Folluwzngplcase find tbr. school information Tcquired for the traffic study. Phuno,. 773-M -0300 Mow. Fox; 773 95 -6500 I. Proposed School Stt31"t and Xnd times: www.sucratcassfioul.org Augus.t 29, 2005 to June 15, 2006 ; 00-AM `TZb 3 = VAK 1Nbfa>en era lr a echool.urg 2. Number of projected studeTits at m= .ng: 158 Projerited by Grade level Pre -K 35 Kdg 20 sellauntos lot 22 2°d 20 $ravmula 3rd 10 Principal 4111 14 William Smut, 5111 10 Arademic Adviser 6111 8 valcraina 13ounas Admirdsh 71h L0 ' 8m live Asalstaml 9 `• • Dr: 5pirn K.ums 3. Number of staff at a =in p B. School Board Administrative: 3 ' Chalrrnan Pre K.ins urgartcn: 3 '• A1ny Thcodompou1w Kindergarten: 3 M President Elelnerttary: 12 Support: 2 4. Percentage of students a- 6vingbybus: IS% Parent drop -off. 85°1a ' S. NLLM* ber buses: of private I all 6. List of after school activities: (see attached) 7. Home Zip Code data of cu.retlt studeiats; ( see attached) Uyou ncad any additional information tonight, please feel free to call me rat home at 773- 777 -8650 Thaak you, Voula Sellountos 6 13, as e-(, 3 Jan. 11 2005 '9:' I?Pm SOCRRIES SCHOOL ERE F I 7736950000 P.3 5oentes Greek A,nterioibn gr11001 Week 'weer §A001 E o ewrcla a r MONDAY 1:15-4-.15 Dr=A L essaets is Cr eek, Grade: K.in"u$arien to TUESDAY 3: t5 — 4:30 Self- DcfrOM All W gs0ups WEDNESDAY jc15 -- 4:1 S Dcarna Less.ans 1n (3rmk, GisJeS_ 3rd 10 64 4:1 S — 5 :15 Drama Losso ns in Grcrk, Crtssdes : ?1'', A ► Advanced -rH'URSDAY 315-4.,15 Greak Falk D=r -'na. B [rl»ed atc 4:15-5;15 Greek Folk Dancing, F RID AY 3:15-4-.30 Sdf- Defense► All age groups L Jan t.l 2005 6:12PM SOCRIFITES SCHOOL 5ocratez Qreek kmeriew School I E r_ td tall Uadaia Sl11/107s Current NUmber at Students per Zipcuae W - --80004 1 ;UM - --.. 2 . • 80016 . 9 _i. GOfl25 _�...• � 6 �- —"1. _50D68 6008 "8 - -. _ 2 - �•�60077 •` —•1 aodsi - -� -�• 1 -• . -6A1Z8 2 601 Cr4 — 2 —_ 603r02� l Z 90813 _13 50830 4 60631 . .., 72 B063d 21, 64640 1 60.641 1 BU64b _ _ 10 60666 -6DBIs r_ 101 60706 Y 2 6071-0 128 • 7'736.350G00 p.4 TOTAL P.05 �. [7 IS © IIIIIIIIIIhIIIII11111111111i1111111111111111111111111. I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I I E) U, J v O - rn = a = U = U = o = o - U -_ Q - C = O = U - N = EDT _ Q 0 - oe _Uoo = Cud _ .o — 0= _ Z a — 0 II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111 1111 ig IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111111111 11111111111111 cu'i t `C`$ -17 8 C., s r1 -j t' !3 E HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1e j Analyst Agency: Date. Period: Proj ect E/W St: DPB GHA 12/1/05 AM PEAK ID: HAAC SITE DRFLD Lake Cook Road Inter.: Pine @ Lake -Cook Rd Area Type: All other areas, Jurisd: CCHD Year BACKGROUND N/S St: Pine Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY. Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 2 0 LGConfig 1'L TR Volume 120 1875 10 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 Duration 0.25 Ar (s) Thru g/C ® Phase Combination 1 Ratios EB Left A Approach Thru Lane Group Flow Rate Right Peds WB Left A (s) Thru g/C Delay Right Delay LOS Peds NB Right SB Right Eastbound Green 10.0 1 Yellow All Red 3.0 4 0.0 1 Southbound L T R 1 2 U 1 U 1 1 U L TR I L R I L 1195 1125 35 12 20 1150 112.0 12.0 110.0 12.0 110.0 1 0 1 0 Type: All other areas Signal Operations 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 i NB Left A i Thru. Right A Peds 1 SB Left A 1 Thru 1 Right A 1 Peds 1 EB Right WB Right .0 20.0 4.5 1.5 r.,, -.l r -4-1, . 1 C n n 1 R 30 10.0 0 secs Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 415 1805 0.05 0.79 1.0 A TR 2530 3615 0.78 0.70 5.5 A 5.5 A Westbound L 231 1805 0.89 0.79 38.6 D II �I TR 2521 3601 0.48 0.70 2.8 A 7.9 A Northbound L 225 1685 0.01 0.13 56.4 E 57.2 E R 215 1615 0.10 0.13 57.3 E Southbound L 225 1685 0.70 0.13 71.6 E 69 .3 E R 201 1507 0.16 0.13 57.9 E Intersection Delay = 10.1 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = B 1 R 30 10.0 0 secs 01 �q �� 3 nI.JG V V V: 0- LY11CL114CU lIlcersections Release 4. le Analyst: DPB Inter.: Pine @ Lake -Cook Rd Agency: GHA Area Type: All other areas Date: 2/1/05 Jurisd: CCHD Period: AM PEAK Year BASELINE Project ID: HAAC SITE DRFLD- INCLDS'CJHS,AND TIMING MOD E/W St: Lake Cook Road NIS St: Pine Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 LGConfig I L TR I L TR L R I L R Volume 120 1930 69 1268 1160 35 117 40 1150 30 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 110.0 12.0 110.0 10.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A A SB Left A Thru A A Thru Right A A Right A Peds Peds NB Right A A EB Right SB Right A ( WB Right Green 10.0 8.0 86.0 28.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.5 4.5 All Red 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5 Cycle Length: 150.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 362 1805 0.06 0.64 4.7 A TR 2063 3599 1.02 0.57 45.4 D 45.0 D Westbound L 303 1805 0.93 0.73 45.8 D (� �I! TR 2329 3602 0.54 0.65 6.7 A 13.9 B Northbound L 315 1685 0.06 0.19 50.2 D 36.7 D R 592 1615 0.07 0,37 30.9 C Southbound �I L 315 1685 0.50 0.19 56.0 E 53.0 D R 442 1507 0.07 0.29 38.3 D �j Intersection Delay = 33.0 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = C 01 �q �� 3 Analyst: DPB Inter.: Pine @ Lake -Cook Rd Agency: GHA Area Type: All other areas Date: 2/1/05 Jurisd: CCHD Period: PM PEAK Year BACKGROUND Project ID: HAAC SITE DRFLD E/W St: Lake Cook Road N' /S St: Pine Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY_ Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R I L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 �t LGC onf i g I L TR L TR L R I L Volume 140 1310 5 130 1640 130 11 20 1120 ( Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 110.0 12.0 110.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 9� Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 '7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A Thru A I Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A Thru Right A I Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 10.0 105.0 20.0 Yellow 3.0 4.5 4.5 All Red 0.0 1.5 1.5 Cycle Length: 150.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group; Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS R 10 10.0 0 Eastbound L 254 1805 0.17 0.79 1.7 A TR 2531 3616 0.55 0.70 3.0 A. 3.0 A Westbound. L 366 1805 0.09 0.79 1.1 A TR 2505 3578 0.74 0.70 4.8 A 4.8 A Northbound L 225 1685 0.00 0.13 56.4 E 57.2 E R 215 1615 0.10 0.13 57.3 E Southbound L 225 1685 0.56 0.13 64.0 E 63.4 E R 201 1507 0.05 0.13 56.9 E Intersection Delay = 6.7 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = A G,,J G 0. secs tiL�zuuu: �lgnaiizea Intersections Release 4.1e Analyst: DPB Inter.: Pine @ Lake -Cook Rd Agency: GHA Area Type: All other areas Date: 2/15/05 Jurisd: CCHD Period: AM PEAK Year FUTURE Project ID: HAAC SITE DRFLD 262 stud E/W St: Lake Cook-Road NIS St: Pine Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig L TR I L TR L R I L Volume 120 1930 112 1320 1160 35 153 85 1150 d Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 110.0 12.0 110.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A Thru A I Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A A SB Left A Thru A A Thru Right A A Right A Peds Peds NB Right A A EB Right SB Right A WB Right Green 14.0 8.0 84.0 26.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 4.5 4.5 All Red 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5 Cycle Length: 150.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 393 1805 0.05 0.65 4.0 A . TR 2115 3777 1.02 0.56 45.7 D 45.2 D Westbound L 351 1805 0.96 0.75 49.8 D TR 2401 3791 0.52 0.63 7.6 A 16.5 B Northbound L 292 1685 0.19 0.17 53.3 D R 39.4 D 614 1615 0.14 0..38 30.6 C Southbound �. L 292 1685 0.54 0.17 58.6 E 54.9 D R 462 1507 0.07 0.31 36.9 D Intersection Delay = 34.3 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = C 1R 30 10.0 0 secs IliLtL8ecrions Kelease 4.1e UFO Analyst: DPB Inter.: Pine @ Lake -Cook Rd Agency: GHA Area Type: All other areas Date: 2/1/05 Jurisd: CCHD Period: PM PEAK Year : BASELINE Project ID: HAAC SITE DRFLD - INLI3S CJHS AND TIMING MOD E/W St: Lake Cook Road N/S St: Pine Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R i L' T R i L T R ; L T R No. Lanes 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR L R L Volume 140 1350 22 150 1690 130 1124 303 1120 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 110.0 12..0 110.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2. 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right A EB Right SB Right A WB Right Green 10.0 95.0 30.0 Yellow 3.0 4.5 4.5 All Red 0.0 1.5 1.5 Cycle Length: 150.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 187 1805 0.22 0.72 4.1 A TR 2286 3609 0.63 0.63 8.8 A 8.6 A Westbound L 296 1805 0.18 0.72 1.9 A TR 2267 3579 0.85 0.63 13.7 B 13.4 B Northbound L 337 1685 0.39 0.20 52.8 D 49.3 D R 495 1615 0.64 0.31 47.8 D Southbound L 337 1685 0.37 0.20 52.6 D 51.3 D R 462 1507 0.02 0.31 36.3 D Intersection Delay = 16.9 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = B o 1 10 10.0 0 secs HUS2000: Slgnallzea intersections Keiease 4.ie areas Analyst: DPB Inter.: Pine @ take -Cook Rd GHA Area Type: All other areas IAgency: Date: 2/15/05 Jurisd: CCHD 1 2 Period: PM PEAK Year FUTURE 5 Project ID: HAAC SITE DRFLD 262 stud* 7 8 EB Left i E/W St: Lake Cook Road' N/S St: Pine Street Left A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Thru A Eastbound' Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes A 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 LGConfig L TR L TR I L R I L R Volume 140 1350 35 66 1690 130 1143 327 1120 10 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 110.0 12.0 110.0 10.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A NB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds ( Peds WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A Thru Right A Right A Peds Peds Right A EB Right ONB SB Right A I WB Right Green 10.0 95.0 30.0 Yellow 3.0 4.5 4.5 All Red 0.0 1.5 1.5 Cycle Length: 150.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 187 1805 0.22 0.72 4.1 A TR 2283 3604 0.64 0.63 8.9 A 8.7 A Westbound L 292 1805 0.24 0.72 2.1 A TR 2267 3579 0.85 0.63 13.7 B 13.3 B Northbound L 337 1685 0.45 0.20 53.7 D 51.1 D R 495 1615 0.69 0.31 50.0 D Southbound L 337 1685 0.37 .O .20 52.6 D 51.3 D R 462 1507 0.02 0.31 36.3 D Intersection Delay = 17.5 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = B secs _o -off_ K a3/ r6 /3 (WTI 16 r 0 Cl r 711 17-1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY tii�'S• C r ". `k4� r. " rSTk Gene'ra1: l:ifo rnon _,, _ Asa -K h „� `?'�"e't3�1`' `i 4 Sit nform<_`�1�o�n�.a T3ia �" Analyst DPB Agency /Co. GHA Date Performed 2/15/05 Analysis Time Period AM PEAK Intersection CJHS / HAAC Jurisdiction LOCAL Analysis Year FUTURE Project Description HAAC SITE DRFLD 262 stud East/West Street: HAAC SITE North /South Street: CJHS Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs 0.25 u adAd's #menu00 Northbound Mite Southbound Major Street Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 37 0 95 132 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 37 0 95 132 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 0 — -- Median Tye Two Way Leff Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration T LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration ..Paola. ,_ Queue M. t_ ;,; an _ kheY.el of S,ervi e SB a Westbound r kr Eastbound Approach NB Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT v (vph) 95 C (m) (vph) 1587 v/c 0.06 95% queue length 0.19 Control Delay 7.4 LOS A Approach Delay -- -- Approach LOS -- -- Rights Reserved 01 HCS2000TM Copyright m 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Version 4.1d I NO IRM a� 19M iff's La TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY E I , i j! " EM-8.10-4at 1 , d WON@ 11 1 1 01; bni 4 RAW— IFM W 711; Analyst DPB Agency/Co. GHA Date Performed 2/15/05 Analysis Time Period PM PEAK Intersection CJHSl HA#,' Jurisdiction LOCAL Analysis Year FUTURE Project Description HAAC SITE DRFLD 262 students East/West Street: HAAC SITE :]North/South Street: CJHS Intersection Orientation: North-South IStud y Period (hrs): 0.25 ry Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 132 0 29 37 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 132 0 29 37 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration T LT Upstream Signal 0 1 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0- Percent Grade (%) 0 - 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 .0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration W4661' .4,415,0W. -11'... To,( - 050 Ig W-110, MEMO Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT v (vph) 29 C (m) (vph) 1466 v/c 0.02 95% queue length 'Control 0.06 Delay 7.5 _ LOS A .Approach Delay j-- Approach LOS Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4, 1 d Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved 0,0 Version 4.1d