Loading...
R-21-30VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD RESOLUTION NO. R-21-30 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMNARY PLAT OF SUBDIVISION (924 and 936 Westcliff Lane) WHEREAS, Theodore D. Kuczek and Cheryl J. Kuczek (collectively, the "Applicants") are the owners of record of the property legally described in Exhibit A ("924 Westcliff Property and commonly known as 924 Westcliff Lane, Deerfield, Illinois ( "Property "); and WHEREAS, Theodore D. Kuczek is the owner of record of the property legally described in Exhibit B ("936 Westcliff Property"), and commonly known as 936 Westcliff Lane, Deerfield, Illinois (the 924 Westcliff Property and 936 Westcliff Property are, collectively, the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Applicants seek to resubdivide the Property into three lots, as depicted on that certain plat entitled Preliminary Plat, prepared by Greengard, Inc., consisting of one sheet, with a last revision date of August 12, 2021, a copy of which is attached to and, by this reference, made a part of this Resolution as Exhibit C ( "Preliminary Plat of Subdivision "); and WHEREAS, the Applicants have applied for approval of the Preliminary Plat of Subdivision pursuant to Section 9.104 of the Subdivision Code of the Village of Deerfield, as amended ( "Subdivision Code"); and WHEREAS, on September 9, 2021, the Village Plan Commission recommended approval of the proposed Preliminary Plat of Subdivision; WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees have determined that it will serve and be in the best interest of the Village and its residents to approve the Preliminary Plat of Subdivision for the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE BOARD OF DEERFIELD, LAKE AND COOK COUNTIES, ILLINOIS, as follows: SECTION ONE: RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution as findings of the Village Board. SECTION TWO: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SUBDIVISION. The Preliminary Plat of Subdivision for the Property is hereby approved pursuant to Section 9.104 of the Subdivision Code. SECTION THREE: SUBMISSION OF FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION. Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 9.104 of the Subdivision Code, the adoption of this Resolution authorizes the Applicants to submit a final plat of subdivision for the Property to the Plan Commission of the Village. The final plat of subdivision for the Property shall be submitted by the Applicants for review and approval by the Village no later than the date that is 12 months after the effective date of this Resolution, or such extended date as may be approved by the Board (00122274.11 of Trustees; provided, however, that if a final plat of subdivision for the Property is not submitted to the Village within such time period, then the approval granted in Section 2 of this Resolution will, at the option of the Village Board, be null and void. SECTION FOUR: EFFECT OF APPROVALS. The approval of the Preliminary Plat of Subdivision for the Property, as set forth in Section 2 of this Resolution, shall not be deemed or interpreted as authorizing or entitling the Applicants to approval of a final plat of subdivision for the Property or to any other approval, or to the issuance of any permit, until after all of the standards and procedures for such other approvals or permits have been satisfied. Nothing herein shall be deemed or interpreted as obligating or requiring the Board of Trustees or the Village to approve a final plat of subdivision or other approval or permit. Further, the Board of Trustees shall have no obligation to consider or approve a final plat of subdivision unless and until the Applicants comply with the applicable procedures for review and approval of a final plat of subdivision for the Property, as set forth in Section 9.104 of the Subdivision Code. SECTION FIVE: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution will be effective only upon the passage by the Village Board in the manner required by law. AYES: Benton, Jacoby, Jester, Metts-Childers, Oppenheim, Seiden NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None PASSED: September 20, 2021 APPROVED: September 21, 2021 RESOLUTION NO. R-21-30 Daniel C. Shapiro, Mayor ATTEST: Kent S. Str et, Village Cler {00122274.1} EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE 924 WESTCLIFF PROPERTY LOTS 3 AND 4 IN BLOCK 26 IN H.M. CORNELL COMPANY'S BRIARWOODS, A RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 AND 12, LOTS 1 TO 24, BOTH INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 20, BLOCKS 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28 AND 29 IN H.O. STONE AND COMPANY'S ADDITION TO DEERFIELD IN SECTIONS 28 AND 29, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID RESUBDIVISION RECORDED NOVEMBER 27, 1928 AS DOCUMENT 328430, IN BOOK "T" OF PLATS, PAGES 40 AND 41, IN LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PIN: 16-28-412-002-0000 Commonly known as: 924 Westcliff Lane, Deerfield, Illinois 60015 (00122274.11 EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE 936 WESTCLIFF PROPERTY LOTS 1 AND 2 IN BLOCK 26 IN H.M. CORNELL COMPANY'S BRIARWOODS, A RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 AND 12, LOTS 1 TO 24, BOTH INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 20, BLOCKS 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28 AND 29 IN H.O. STONE AND COMPANY'S ADDITION TO DEERFIELD IN SECTIONS 28 AND 29, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID RESUBDIVISION RECORDED NOVEMBER 27, 1928 AS DOCUMENT 328430, IN BOOK "T" OF PLATS, PAGES 40 AND 41, IN LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PIN: 16-28-412-001-0000 Commonly known as: 936 Westcliff Lane, Deerfield, Illinois 60015 (00122274.11 EXHIBIT C PLAT OF SUBDIVISION (00122274.11 38f�` fa 556 6 b C 3Qo m� 8� a of �j8m� 8� i; m.go Po s _om s a z Imo -�88 i P s� i l " �£L,a_ ooe8o gE o m 5 6a W" m o. ygog7 9 o C Fm o no � o ag � memo IN : gg Ib Eo'^f `�"�o Ba_ Boo 9gR N'`e Y �R"�3 B. ��sx�F_<,8=s3m 30 "3^ �q9c^ oo iEoo iq o�B - b - "e^3C!''R�g— _u,� Oct FFi _-R G S 3 �I I BI I LOT LOT 2® 9� L04 29 L04 22 L07 98 PP s 0. 0d 00• E 265.00' ° .____ 75.00•__ _ _ ____ 75.00•____ t0' GSEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILIiES h 0 _�___ GE (HEREBY _115.a6 G_RA� CA I`+ G)UP IR 'PalUl <��' m � N -- -'- o o 8 w o og �fu --------- 66.-w- �eSxJ8 o> N6 �N 9 no 75.00' ssaa _ 75-00' ssao' �' / Sao' ss' n9.sa7 --ww' O T m Lwf t i+.is E 5'0' 00' 00 E °x uUE a ie E1 234.64' � CRe o° o zs'e (�o.az IIPE JJ < B ¢N u OB° -' _ •z ig o c WESTCLIFF LANE i8 FEE'NU - dew �N Mm� TNo r AR ;o ° m _ S z�66 wee€� 8, m AP •>" ^� 9 as m�m� �� � ��m � o � on'� 8 N�� � J R 9C2' a�cNo�ms s3§I�`pg=N` oo^yoym��omo n - � Ao a F. sm�R H� zgg s § nyy " rn 3 m o mggRNaYm�m� m�c�F�F = 9- " �2c�� v UBmR� " o $�^� mR"y" g�M o Mpg- z z O _47so`x �- 3oom No Fo�o " m" �3m II II p mq zoG 8 Ums 00 oaten"rzm - - a . o ";� mgs gTo$6"� F€ G�mSm�� Kn' � �eg 9 8:ate �. o�fmo� �Xm o rn rn (n O Occ m fie- m Ea�� m� 3 NoF� - m8oa 9ozm z m 99 6S� �m'= g�sNo ��. off_m9 r g=�c$ �'� o rpgq. OD co moaS Cog "� 9gm_n9ip CC A? Public Hearing August 26, 2021 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING 1) Public Hearing on the Request for Approval of a Preliminary Plat of Resubdivision at 924 and 936 Westcliff Avenue Chairman Berg swore in all who plan to testify before the Commission. Mr. Ryckaert reported that the legal notice for this matter was published in the Deerfield Review on August 5, 2021, and proof of certified mailing was received at Village Hall. The petitioner Ted Kuczek addressed the Commission stating that he is the current property owner and resident at 924 Westcliff and recently acquired the property located at 936 Westcliff Lane. He is joined by project engineer Doug White. He stated that he intends to resubdivide these two parcels which currently exist as four lots; two at 924 Westcliff which are 65 feet wide by 130 feet deep, and two at 936 Westcliff, one at 70 feet wide by 130 feet deep and one at 65 feet wide by 130 feet deep. The house at 936 Westcliff is to be remodeled, and 20 feet of the south portion of 936 Westcliff property will be added to the 924 Westcliff property. This will turn two 65 foot wide lots on the 924 Westcliff Lane property into two 75 foot wide lots. It is Mr. Kuczek's intention for the reasonably foreseeable future to remain in his house at 924 Westcliff straddling the two 75 foot wide lots. 936 Westcliff is currently under contract, and he understands that the purchasers will be remodeling that home. Chairman Berg confirmed that the new lots would conform to Village zoning requirements. Commissioner Goldstone confirmed that he has no plans to develop the two 75 foot wide lots now, but in the future this could become two homes on the two lots. Mr. Kuczek confirmed this and stated that the subdivision would provide more options including replacing his home with a larger ranch. He stated that his intention at this time is to remain in his current home. Commissioner Stolman commented that there was considerable feedback from the neighbors and asked Mr. Kuczek if he had any conversations with them to discuss concerns. Mr. Kuczek stated that he understands their concerns but has not had any individual conversations about this due to a recent death in his family. Commissioner Bromberg asked if there is a problem with rainwater on the property at this time. Mr. Kuczek replied that in a very rainy season the back of the yard does get moisture as it is lower back there. There are times it is difficult to mow there but there has never been any standing water. Commissioner Bromberg stated that if there is a time in the future when there is a request for the current home to be torn down and build two homes that the property, that the plans would have to be engineered to make sure the rainwater situation does not get any worse for any neighboring properties. Mr. Ryckaert stated that any plans cannot adversely impact the neighborhood with stormwater. The Village has a storm water ordinance that does not allow for an increase in storm water runoff, so storm water engineering plans would have to be addressed for any future plans for the property. Mr. Kuczek asked if this would apply to the remodel of the home at 936 Westcliff. Mr. Ryckaert stated that per the building permit, if they are going to add an addition then they have to address the storm water drainage and these plans must be part of submitted to the Village. Commissioner Goldstone confirmed that this is part of the permit process. Mr. Ryckaert replied that as part of the proposed subdivision, engineering plans are submitted. If 924 Westcliff were to be redeveloped into two homes in the Public Hearing August 26, 2021 Page 3 future, the engineering plans would have to be modified for the new homes on the parcels. Also, if there is an addition at 936 Westcliff, it must address the storm water. In other words, there will be engineering with the proposed subdivision, but it will need to be modified for a new home on the lots, or if there is an addition to the existing home on the property. Chairman Berg opened public comment on this matter. Mary Ann D'Onofrio of 330 Margate Terrace addressed the Commission. She stated that she is familiar with the drainage problems at Westcliff and Margate. She asked the Commission to deny this request until a proper storm sewer system can be installed on Margate Terrace. The water from Westcliff runs into Margate Terrace which has undersized sewers for all of the new construction homes there. Until this can be fixed any further subdivision should not be allowed as we cannot keep overbuilding and dividing properties without fixing known issues. She stated that it has been documented by the Village that there is an undersized sewer for the storm water there and she requests that this request be denied until the storm sewer on Margate Terrace can be replaced. She stated that she presented the Village's drainage study documenting the storm sewer system on Margate and the connection to Oxford. The flooding problem is well documented, and she has also talked to the Public Works Department. She added that she has build a berm and flood wall on her property to protect her home as the water at the intersection billows up around the inlet and her property gets a lot of water. Mr. Nakahara stated that Mrs. D'Onofrio also submitted public comment through email that will be entered into the record. Mr. Nakahara read aloud other public comment emails received. Public Comment Email #1 "I would like to voice my deep concerns regarding the proposed changes to the current zoning protections on 924 and 936 Westcliff Lane as requested by Mr. Ted Kuczek. By definition, zoning restrictions are put in place to "prevent new development from interfering with existing uses and/or to preserve the character of a community." By granting Mr. Kuczek his request to put three houses on a piece of land that has for years held two, the village is violating the protections set forth in current zoning regulations as they relate to that location. The only parties that benefit are clearly Mr. Kuczek, the developers and the Village through increased tax revenue. These are short term monetary only gains which will at some point be greatly offset by the considerable environmental damage, exponential stress on the current sewer system and most importantly, the negative impact this decision would have on those living adjacent to this proposed block of houses. The Planning Commission must weigh all of these factors equally when debating this issue. For the past several years construction of massive homes on plots of land never intended to deal with such structures has been allowed with no restrictions on maintaining adequate green space to absorb run-off from the structure. You need only to look to the city of Houston to see what this lack of oversight has resulted in- massive flooding and damage in the billions of dollars. I have lived in this area for over two decades and witnessed the streets flooding after heavy downpours because the sewer system cannot keep up. Water has risen to the middle of my front and back lawns due to continued substitution of grass for cement. This is the new norm, and the Planning Commission must recognize and adapt to the human and monetary costs associated with overdevelopment. The proposed zoning change is the definition of overdevelopment. Public Hearing August 26, 2021 Page 4 We are in a "Code Red" of climate crisis with no indication of a reversal. Our children and grandchildren will be left with a dystopian environment of oppressive heat and massive downpours that was brought about by our "excesses." By continuing to eliminate even more greenspace and cutting down tree after tree to make room for oversized houses the Village only exacerbates this problem. The Planning Commission should and must modify its thinking towards future development in Deerfield to try to mitigate and mend the effects of new construction has on our environment. We cannot think and act like we did twenty years ago. Granting this exemption to Mr. Kuczek is reckless and a thumbing of the nose to the neighbors behind his current residence who will deal with flooded yards, basements and a deterioration in their quality of life that the loss of shade and privacy these three new homes would result in. These people have rights and for too long, developer's needs and wants have overshadowed the needs and wants of current homeowners. Mr. Kuczek has already built a large new home in a different county with acreage and orchards. He will enjoy a wonderful quality of life free from the fear of flooding and invasion of privacy not to mention a very fat bank account that came on the backs of his former neighbors. This proposal is born of pure greed. It does nothing to better Westcliff Lane and Margate Terrace- in fact, it destroys the current leafy, spacious aesthetic of the street. That corner will look like a dense city landscape if Mr. Kuczek's wish is granted. I hope the Planning Commission looks past the immediate tax boost and acts in the best interests of the environment and the current residents of this neighborhood. Thank you for your time. Regards, Lauretta M. Reising 924 Oxford Road" Public Comment Email #2 "We have lived at 905 Oxford Road since 1993. From our backyards along the 900 block on Oxford Rd, south to Margate Terrace, there have been water problems in the backyards for years. The water naturally drains to the north and by putting up 3 larger structures at the north end of the block, I can guess the water problems along our yards will increase. I hope the village would address this potential problem. We don't begrudge anyone the right to remodel an existing home. The renovation done at 939 Westcliff was thoughtfully done, profitable and less destructive to the neighborhood than a tear down. Even 927 Westcliff was thoughtfully done for the lot size. If the proposed 3 homes are 3500 square feet or larger, with very shallow backyards of only 25 feet, this doesn't leave much in the way of air and light between fences and buildings. It also changes the privacy of the homes to which they back up. We bought our home because of its spacious, private backyard. The kind of backyards that we thought Deerfield residents valued. Our home existed on a lot flanked by open land in 1993. The previous owner of our home, Mr DeGrange, had purchased the side yards from adjacent homes. That made a buildable lot on Public Hearing August 26, 2021 Page 5 each side of us. We did not own the lots. Two 3400- square foot homes were built on each side of us. Besides losing realistic privacy in our main rooms, we also had to deal with less sunlight plus water issues inside and outside our home. I'm not sure anyone bothered checking into the 45-degree rule to see the impact these new buildings would have on the existing homes. I hope my letter provokes thought and helps the Village do the right thing. Zoning laws are put in place to protect the integrity of the community. My thoughts and others from my neighbors are not just complaints. The real concern is that just because it is possible to build three houses on these two lots, doesn't mean it's the best choice for our neighborhood. Thank you, Mary Beth Strotman" Public Comment Email #3 "I am writing this letter in hopes of urging the Planning Commission of Deerfield to reconsider the proposed plan to subdivide and build on the lots of 924 and 936 Westcliff Lane. As long term residents of Deerfield since 1998 we are highly concerned over the short and long term effects of this proposed subdivision. Our concerns stem from experience right here at 931 Oxford Rd when construction of a large home occurred in 2010 directly next door to us. The property next door to our home originally consisted of a smaller ranch home which was subsequently torn down to make way for a large, 6,000 sq.foot home. Since the construction of this larger home, we have consistently struggled with water issues and flooding in our backyard. During the construction period back in 2010, which lasted at least 6 months, we had to endure the inconvenience, mess, noise and dust that the construction work inevitably produced which turned the quiet, pleasant neighborhood street of Oxford Rd upside down. Dust, large nails, large vans and trucks clogged the street and made it difficult for many of us to even back out of our own homes. Most importantly, however, construction became a serious concern for us during that time period when our 10 year old son, Jack, was fighting for his life following his relapse of leukemia which required him to have a bone marrow transplant and left him dangerously vulnerable and susceptible to infection from the excessive outdoor dust particulate that this construction could potentially have caused. Our oncologists at University of Chicago expressed serious concern over Jack's exposure to this specific outdoor dust caused by this next door development. Because of this, Jack was isolated primarily inside our home during his transplant recovery. Sadly, we were unable to even offer him the simple pleasure and distraction of playing outside in our own backyard. While most people are not recovering from organ transplants that require them to avoid the dust caused by outdoor construction sites, there are a number of people who are fighting Covid19 these days within this very neighborhood and these streets. And while we would all like to believe that this pandemic is almost over, that would be negligent on our behalf. Research indicates that we are far from over with this pandemic and that it will be a longer term threat for the next few years. In the meantime, the dust that three construction work sites may cause could potentially worsen anyone's case of Covid19 as this is an illness that largely threatens to weaken pulmonary functioning. As a matter of public health, building three homes right now right next to each other will cause enough dust to seriously threaten the chances of anyone's recovery from Covid19 in this immediate area. And, while this may not become a threat to lives on the scale of perhaps the Flint, Michigan water crises, aren't even just a handful of lives more important than the money the Village of Deerfield may make from an added home? And would Public Hearing August 26, 2021 Page 6 this sit well with the board, with the residents, and with some impassioned litigators who may become enraged with this potential scenario? I believe this could become a regrettable mistake for the Village of Deerfield in light of these times and in light of the effects it could pose during this public health crises. Putting the public health risk issue aside, it is also important to consider the environmental issues this proposed subdivision and redevelopment could cause. Neighborhood flooding all over the Midwest is a recurring theme and threat now in light of climate change. Larger homes and smaller yards will only exacerbate the problem of neighborhood flooding and water runoff. The Village of Deerfield may one day soon become overwhelmed with this issue and may regret the number of larger homes it allowed for. Developing larger homes on smaller lots will only exacerbate flooding issues which currently remains a realistic, damaging threat facing cities all over this country today. It is negligent for us to ignore this issue and lose an important opportunity to combat or at least mitigate this damaging trend by continuing to develop large homes and contributing to the crises before us. Finally, I am also urging the Planning Commission to consider the importance of maintaining an aesthetically pleasing image within the Deerfield community and neighborhoods. If we wish to attract home buyers in the future, we should remember the fact that many buyers list "beautiful, wooded neighborhoods" as their priority when looking at communities and neighborhoods to purchase homes in. The more we continue to build larger homes on smaller lots while eliminating green space, the more we are eliminating a large segment of potential home buyers down the road. One of the reasons my husband and I were attracted to the town of Deerfield was for its aesthetically appealing wooded neighborhoods. We were drawn to backyards with large trees and plenty of privacy and green space. Now, with the possible construction of three large homes behind us, we will likely be staring up at 3 large, towering homes rather than green trees and blue sky. Less appealing neighborhoods and backyards will attract less buyers which will in turn ultimately reduce resale values of homes in Deerfield. This is important to consider if we as a community want to continue to remain a desirable town for home buyers and compete with surrounding areas and neighborhoods like Highland Park and Lake Forest. For the above reasons we strongly urge the Planning Commission to reconsider subdividing two properties to make way for the construction of new, larger homes. I hope that the Planning Commission will make the right choice in the interest of public health during this pandemic and in the wake of so many recent climate crises occurring across this country. I believe that we can choose to be part of the solution rather than part of the problem and hope that the members of the Planning Commission will understand that it isn't enough to just talk to our children about the importance of caring for their planet, their neighbors and their community. I challenge the Commission to live out their values and strive to combat or at least mitigate our current climate challenges while effectively becoming a progressive, leading community that other communities will favorably regard and aspire to while becoming an example of leadership rooted in progress, sound judgement and values. Thank you for your time and attention. Regards, Lauren and Matt Trapani" Chairman Berg stated that any proposed development is required to follow the Village storm water ordinance which does not allow for any additional storm water runoff. It states that site Public Hearing August 26, 2021 Page 7 drainage conditions during and after construction may not be any worse than before construction. Chairman Berg asked Mr. Lichterman to address some of the public comment on this matter. Mr. Lichterman stated that he has an understanding of this matter and has had previous correspondence with residents on this. He stated that the Village Engineering Department has been working with Mrs. D'Onofrio and it is a known issue which the engineers are working to resolve. The Village has a storm water master plan that is near final completion, and this is a portion of the plan. He stated that her comments to the extent of this being an ongoing issue is correct and the Village is working to resolve it. These issues exist separate from the resdubivison as this has not occurred yet. The storm water ordinance states that any development on a lot cannot adversely impact or further exasperate this problem. If Village engineers do not think this could be developed appropriately without adversely impacting neighbors then the Engineering Department would not approve the plans. Any future development would have the burden of demonstrating to the Village that they can manage the storm water on their property without impacting the neighbors and this is the standard Village - wide. Commissioner Keefe commented that each of the houses on the property could be torn down tomorrow and larger structures could be build there that could have nothing to do with the resubdivision. So it is not as if subdividing could prevent someone from doing construction in the neighborhood or increasing the square footage on the lot, and storm water would still need to be addressed. Commissioner Goldstone stated that the comments about the storm water does not have anything to do with the subdivision that is being applied for. It would be relevant when those lots are actually being developed. The Commission is not being asked to make a determination on that. The petitioner is asking to divide into two buildable lots rather than one oversized lot. Commissioner Bromberg agreed that there is a storm water problem on Margate, but this has no relevance to this petition. Chairman Berg asked Mr. Kuczek if he wishes to make a closing statement. Mr. Kuczek stated that he is also a concerned neighbor, and he believes that what he will be doing might actually be improving the situation. Right now there is no storm water management on either of the two lots and this could be improved in the future. He understands the concern, but he believes it is not well placed. He added that previously on this property two homes were allowed on this lot. He added that there are more trees on the property now than when he bought it and per the tree ordinance any future development would have to have as much or more vegetation as they would take down. And so with these ordinances in place, there are protections to allow for progression and still have as many trees as possible and storm water management in place. Chairman Berg stated that the Plan Commission has concluded public testimony and will deliberate their recommendation on this matter. He stated that this portion of the meeting is open to the public, but no new testimony will be taken unless requested by the Commission. He stated that the Plan Commission is a recommending body, a written recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board of Trustees who will take final action on this matter. Commissioner Goldstone stated that she supports this subdivision. Commissioners Stolman, Keefe and Bromberg agreed. Public Hearing August 26, 2021 Page 8 Commissioner Bromberg moved, seconded by Commissioner Goldstone to approve the request for approval of a preliminary plat of resubdivision at 924 and 936 Westcliff Avenue. The motion passed with the following vote. Ayes:Bromberg, Goldstone, Keefe, Stolman, Berg (5) Nays: (0) None Mr. Ryckaert reported that this matter will go before the Village Board on September 20, 2021. ment Approval \July d Recommendation on the Request for Approval of a Special Use for a If- ent Facility for Premier Martial Arts at 656 Deerfield Road d Recommendation on the Request for Approval for a Preliminary P at of ision of the Property at 1210 Gordon Terrace 021 Plan Commission Minutes Commissioner Bro erg moved, seconded by Commissioner Stolman toSprove the documents. The motio passed with the following vote. Ayes: Stolman, Keefe, Go stone, Bromberg, Berg (5) Nays: (0) Items from the Staff Mr. Ryckaert reported on upcoming Plad September 9, 2021, which will be docum Designation of Representative for the next ission enda items. The next meeting will be : only. rd of Trustees Meeting Commissioner Bromberg and Chairman Bpfg will attel�e next Board of Trustees Meeting on September 8, 2021. Public Comment Mr. Ryckaert reported that the was no public comment received email during the meeting. Mr. Nakahara reported that ere was no one requesting public com nt on Zoom, and no one present at Village Hall for ublic comment. Adjournment There being no rther discussion, Commissioner Goldstone moved, seconded by Commission Bromberg to adjourn the meeting at 8:23 P.M. The motion passed the ollowing vote. Ayes:/Bromberg, Goldstone, Keefe, Stolman, Berg (5) Na : (0) Respectfully Submitted, Laura Boll Public Hearing and Workshop Meeting July 22, 2021 Page 5 WORKSHOP MEETING 1) Prefiling Conference on the Request for a Preliminary Plat of Resubdivision at 924 and 936 Westcliff Avenue The petitioner for this matter, Ted Kuczek of 924 Westcliff in Deerfield, addressed the Commission. He stated that he acquired the property at 936 Westcliff with the intention of taking 20 feet off the southern property line and adding it to his current property at 924 Westcliff. In its current state it is four non -buildable lots. Three of them are 65 feet by 130 feet and one is 70 feet by 135 feet. By taking 20 feet and adding it to his property he intends to have two buildable lots with 75 feet of frontage each and one lot remaining with the existing house at 936 Westcliff. He intends to remain in his home at 924 Westcliff and this is a plan for the future of his property. 936 Westcliff is currently under contract for purchase by a new owner. Commissioner Bromberg confirmed that Mr. Kuczek's house will straddle two lots and there will be a neighboring lot with one house. Commissioner Bromberg commented that someday the plan could be to tear down the house Mr. Kuczek lives in, and two separate houses could be built there. Mr. Kuczek added that it is more valuable to him to have two potentially buildable lots even though he plans to maintain his one home there at this time. Commissioner Bromberg confirmed that this makes it flexible for him and leaves the options open. Commissioner Bromberg summarized that 924 Westcliff will be two lots with one house in the current state and that the three lots will all conform to Village requirements, and if Mr. Kuczek sells, a new buyer will have options. Mr. Kuczek stated that he has no current plans for the two lots his home will be on, if the resubdivision is approved. Commissioner Keefe commented that it has minimal impact on the neighborhood, and he has no concerns. Commissioner Goldstone and Chairman Berg agreed as this plan conforms and has minimal impact. Chairman Berg added that he appreciates the presentation made and suggests that for the Public Hearing the petitioner provide visuals of the properties. Mr. Kuczek added that they do currently have a tree survey and any new plans would have to meet the tree mitigation requirements of the Village's tree ordinance. He is not sure at this point if plans for the new home at 936 Westcliff will require any tree mitigation. t Approval 1. July 8,-20g'j..Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Commissioner Bromberg mov econded by Commissiol� � .-oldstone to approve the minutes. The motion passed with the wing vote. Ayes: Bromberg, Keefe, Golds Berg Nays: None (0) Items from the Mr. R rt reported on upcoming Plan Commission agenda items. The next ust 12, 2021 and will be document approval only. Village of Deerfield 2021 Zoning Ordinance Map MARGATETER IL z Ir to. - Y j o KINGS70N -pm; DEtRFIELD-RD �+ n' �._l R_ 51NGLE FAMILY DISTRICT ONE FAMILYDN ELLINGS ANDA("CESSORY I:SES R-2 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT SAME:ASRI 7-� R}.� SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT SI.E Al '■tt� iE —4 11 �� SINGLE S TWO FAMILY ONE FA--NILY E'ill'u FAM11A r'WFLLIti—S& ACCESSORY U5F5 — GENERAL RESIDENCE ONEFAMILY'F s FAMII.S'pN'iLLltiliSF .,11YE-i4DR4' IISES C- 1 VILLAGECEATER G-2 OI.TLl'1NO COMMERICAL C-3 LIMITED COMMERICAL OFFICE T 1 OFFICE. RESEARCH,RESTRICTF-_D 1 INDUSTRY 1-2 LIMITED INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC LATT)S P-1 Sl'DpOLS. PARKS. K. ULIC bD U.D(NUS k CEMETERIES ISCOnsortium 924 & 936 Westdiff Lane + F �•�1 �r. 1�..�: � - _ tee:' r —r _ ,e L� j jJrt P`.." yrA It.. - yarn ��• �1[::��' — ) '� ;� �' r _'-• }`T` 'fir p• lFa -.. -t- Al ix, V'' t. fe I am �1��y.� •` F�r� •"}y� �y,�`p.,,��r,—�, ' 's gar_■ � � ,�v�, !lit I d •. � ��' r W 1�.s."i 1 Jk _ r 4LOO � ..�i . +t ....,r .,:.�•_ ....ems_ 4 morfi�fd t•.�—�. tiff• �•:�� ap& tS f r 4 i ._ Legend 0 200 400 Print Date: 7/15/2021 Notes ft Disclaimed The GIs Consortium and MGP Inc are not liable for any use, mouse, modification or disclosure of any map provided under applicable law. This map is forgeneml information purposes only. Although the information is believed to be generally accurate, errors may exist and the user should independently confirm for accuracy. The map does not constitute a regulatory determination and is not a base for engineering design. A Registered Land surveyor should be consulted to determine precise location boundaries on the ground. Mr. Kuczek has purchased the property at 936 Westcliff and also owns the property immediately to the south at 924 Westcliff Lane in which he resides. The property at 936 Westcliff Lane consists of a single family home on 2 lots (a 70 foot wide lot by 135 foot deep lot, and a 65 foot wide lot by 135 foot deep lot), and the property at 924 Westcliff Lane consists of a single family home on 2 lots (each lot is 65 feet wide by 135 feet deep). Mr. Kuczek is proposing to take a 20 foot wide strip of the property from 936 Westcliff property and incorporate this 20 feet into the property to the south at 924 Westcliff creating two 75 foot wide buildable lots of records for the 924 Westcliff property. This reconfiguration of the lot lines on these properties would create a 3 lot resubdivision: 1 lot at the north that would be 115 feet wide by 135 feet deep (the remaining house would stay and there does not appear to be issues with the building setback after taking 20 feet from this property — some improvements are planned to this house at some point in the future); a 2"d lot and 3rd lot that are each 75 feet wide by 135 feet deep. Mr. Kuczek would like to leave his existing house on 924 Westcliff to straddle the 2 new 75 foot wide lots until at some point in the future when the existing house would be torn down to allow a new home on each of the new lots. File: �mo 3 V)Q �N n 3 0 C — C,, rW � L S O � 2 M G `L1 0 = S � m N 2' N �OaH Z 00) 18-S6.dwg Jul 04,2021-6:11om A pp -I N# W N , a=0 !�m Ai3;z O v ri= mr mo�fm< O O •• o g AnOmmZ 47 41 nN 40 '(('jjII�jl nym ZOz=N 0:"-, c I�O� U A�z A�Nmzm �Xm Z AA zz r-oozz� z m x z VI 71 C = j1* pC A m `+ m ► O A m RI N I eb 1 Z En Z- � [[[77N00 0 0 z O N ZH"A' m oN� om'a-imnr mDD v A , mm x p S O Irn Z a m�0 moz3Am N Z " Z O G rn 0 m5z ory 0. r-n0rn c m ca r, n g m1 , CO tj tj I(J%J I ovv zmv� m �ov� v a m pa m 0 D o :i m ozut -m Aza�sA � v Z C 1 11m D O Z n M >y 0 Z 0 ./ ma 0g o2 m I � ? 0 U w m O A {O r� z<m K v z �N ymurom n � � m O 0 mN v* 09-uZ A m BB m A m X C7 z�rp Mmx to c7 x Ul m m rn 71 A o to m L m z I n c (n _r" `Zri�zm- m G) l! '• D Off; m m o V OD C] r_� rrl 0mz 3 �v m < �WOn CC 00 D o N 00 -I 2m� m to r^ c��c ��mmO� vz0 m �_ Q 0C Em- 55 9oo n� C > rn mn O min r m m (n _ V (J1 N � C v z_ m TI m w_ 0 o m O m v�D 00� o 0O 0 CD ;00*m TI m z P o Z m Aca I n C 0 C m ITI /1 �JJ m _ z0E= 0z�cn mC00 �mr m /C 6 � 0 m C Z o - m� z vim= = m E 1n Z =o N N� w � Z rn W W O N 00 o m LOT FENCE ENDS 0.3' W FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE ON-UNE 01 z 00 N m �] N z • 0) N � t0 rn Z m W N m = O n Z r C7 o � O P' o UND CUT CROSS -UNE & 14.16' E r O r.� OZ 0 0 �� O Z c-� n 17.06' , O _ N 3,78' N w 36.76' �g FENCE CORNER WOOD FENCE — 0.5' W S0'00'00"E r0 f p Z (In O O O r� C = O = a rr r rn m Z C) LOOT 200 WOOD FENCE - 130.00, 1F3EN S & ORNERY - 74.06' 20.00'-~ - BAY - WINDOW 1-STORY pQ 41 BRICK &FRAME 6,1 RESIDENCE an 58.14' _20.00'_� 4 30' BUILDING LINE I I fe` oo Ic, 0z I� 90 r-z mom. c0 I� n I zI � � I S 0' 00' 00" E I I130.00, FOUND CUT CROSS ON-UNE & 14.13' E CONC. WALK CONC. APRON CONC. WALK DEP. CURB - CONC. CURB WESTCLIFF LANE ASPHALT PAVEMENT L(7 21 �- WOOD FENCE - - FENCE CORNER 0.9' N & 1.6' W Zrma:S j0�0 OD c! D� Nmco C <o0Z QOD "ZZ]NN �" � 0 �Z00r" D TI n75DZ WOmZ cn co cu V7 om zp� o�o0 c(ilorn m <z�� <z cn rn_ z m z COD=D _ O rI0-C Z :0.�O-�C7 WWI a �o�� o�c) �00y ;;a 70 N-A N Pm Z O cn rn r- 00 " m oZo 0v m� Orym0 (00D O m �N Z Ncfl zo" o ��(n (AL �r Ny r N N 0 Z � 0 m 0 O m N N o rn T r a O mn m m Kenton Rd Oxtord Rd o � �« r � We$(clif113 A File. D m 67063-SB.dwg Mar 28,2021-7.06am > wN� vl+up a�0 0vvvID0 z 0- 0 0 m � �� Co � xr0 -mm I21AIz 0 mv�fm yDp 0-- m- M- g Z C ADm zOzrnfO Z to (A A<mNrAnZm O :3 n 2 { c C m O-Z" sogzi9 z^ 0 9 2 A m C NOm mZC�=v y ; O 00 mN e�i i 1 � i��A OgDA'- � a� 0 v y Q C C/i W O D v m =N� A(mi/O�OZ mmD Z Q y O 0 nmn O mVz naN<pm N c i�z ompomo� �a a Q �p r �o�N ��>�0 O Z M m D O_m Amg�c O r 0 2 Arcrn:,,r Do O I Z A c 00Z Zz"oz �^ W mE] OZmo m vNi mZ z A v c v * U - {.� M A mmn M _ = o N A :n M 0 z os�A�- =m OmEZU1 —I - -/; D L O 7 20 O_ L O 7 ML O 7 22 FENCE CORNER WOOD FENCE �` FENCE CORNER _ FENCE CORNER o.s' N & 1.6' W S 01, 00' 00" E 135.00' 4.8' N & 1.s' W WOOD FENCE 1.3, S & 1.1' W c 65.00' 70.00' I o r r I I o z z IN I s� n O \ oA I� 0 A iI fz 55 z CONC. WALK I I m O O z o N j o z 23.44' m X m _;0 v -u O r r Z m U) m \I Ci1 NO z-;0 aim Omz 25 � n rCcA o� v D v (NO 2 A vg mU)- C�mom vmm mSv E 0 0 04 CD o-n z _ 00 ONo 0 N m O A o boo Z= (04 O o fo c � Im w 0� n m 0 00 0 o moo* m A F 0O X m O X Cm rrn c r* r v c�0�= v cmn o - N0rn cZ0 �j N� � - v o E z Nm US Vl ww Zw O N o0 0 — m Z r 00 co m rn OCA Z 0 N m GI 0 Q O Q� no ,�g o r 36.66' 30' BUILDING LINE l GI Ico I U! I I I I 65.00' cc .0■ 00' 00 " E FOUND CUT CROSS ON-LINE & 14.13' E (./IAIIIIIAI I/ O � z v D O m COVERED 'i CONC. PORCH 1 41.82' (4 cn 0 0 CONC. DRIVE 35' Z o°° Z J Nm cD m 0 C� 0T(W O �_ + � m N 0 m Oa 0 36.08' :p. 0 0 20.28' III O = 25_10'__ II cno o WN IM - i O ry r r 'm oa- n m I ool I 39.65(39.68') (104.68') _ _ _ _ _(30.32') _ J 104.65' FOUND 3/4" IRON PIPE 0.24' S & 0,06' E CONC. WALK CONC. WALK - CONC. CURB WESTCLIFF LANE ASPHALT PAVEMENT 0 OH — 0 M c> 0 Wa G) D �mD D C mmm �a 00 z 5')rn 0 0�I xmO -Tic C- zXC7 COS 00� N Dry 00 rp �z j �D m-- cnp z� mZN Op �ONN- N w0 om rn- C� Z c z"� K- M o- r m DZN 0 N X00J N r 00 2D - a 4' Z Z N 1 G�p00 DZ zOcNOZCD p � =�pN N' OCo � mom c� =Z o; —7�v= r -O O �r O(D Dzp NK p0Z �-0 D m N m=D v) z 0 cn v c70p = M:z00 M <G�zD rn cn Fmk CO oO =Ivj z `-" O Z mDv mu O-p ZD p0- Cox 0O O(n z -'z c)c zl? moo 0-10 N< m m = in 00 70 0 mp z x so Q9 aE goso 20 14 m e°�^e3 n.�'.^So n3= a < aU�s A ze& R-ga =•X$- 1 zb--U! iii�3: a3 I g �'-. f'�'z'� TF g no -op asS'_" a .tla3a 6'�5> 8 jo ll o �` ift Q 1 pig C� o ^A - c ou-` Rn6 " �m3uS8Stl`�8 � Ti `` -__ate oe. ;9��ad5'& �o Aea• ?a_ 'R R2s�83}^� Si3e- I ��'� �� s d LOT LOT 20 LOT 29 LOT QQ L07 96 o Jp IRa P s D' 00' 00• E 265.00' D -DxE " _ FD o Si,• IRax F x^P T — — — — 75.00" — — 75.00' 115.00' 10' EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC VPV ES h DRH E (HEREBY GRAN1E01 — C o �i ® ®e -4 A� saz°�>Sxa ==o - m m PA lip m �> � 5A ® oN^z. PR M Ncn -.g9�og -� o Ao Nn n -So a �MG LI" 75.00' 75.00' - 84.54' 4RmJ � � Ja (JO.Jz S 0' 00' 00" E 234.64' 0$4 ,, II B um sa,g Ixo D lM7 o.os F ue � . w m� WESTCLIFF LANE oc� _0 lit. oz� Se ph ,o �D ti"8> g F moo"- "> �� a'Q " N �o _ mF _ :rlo�eNN» �_- rT P - o="",�� RE I " r�a?8 -- m 'a A8 18 o v on ��-> oNo � o " A�"'"9o�m>: N x PIT- �o E _ `L o �nnm on a.yoFoii�+_ � Im wooz�g"��o "i F. o WA mom^ @Ln a z z 0 8mA� ^`£g"anm <9 Bum ao R. o"0 3�g^KNo €g oP, �o m €�my s um s P" _� sma � =oA zu3ft m 4E� T3� �o 68�N?�';^" nnF`T�g Rm�` 11 CID w Z EEG1L DESCRIPTION BEING A RESUBDMSION OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 IN BLOCK 26 IN H. M. CORNELL COMPANY'S BRIARWOODS, A RESUBDMSION OF BLOCKS 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 AND 12. LOTS 1 TO 24. BOTH INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 20, BLOCKS 21. 22 25, 26, 27. 28 AND 29 IN H.O. STONE AND COMPANY'S ADDNION TO DEERFIELD IN SECTIONS 26 AND 29, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN LAKE COUNTY, ILUNOIS. T Bn .—..- BxwEe]°uFF �ciEiq ILL I B� wn.xn Ins* m a wm.. xo.l mel �mn uwE+m �91n � w.a mw,l Z BsM IficFmr e 30 SOB HENCBMARK: ---- — . — NazE xFiDm N--- -- EIN"1pN•669.,8L 5�=MARGATE TERRACE "��fiT��,�-- N 89' 19' 32" E 104.651' 1a. Ne•.---r"Je• I �� GIBI/� / / .,a-»,:,. 4 W. � If r II, I fl.l g LOT1 I II II I � ICI, 15326 S.F. I I 11. -III e El- 0 r� _ I I IIII Q �l I f Iw I III M. I � :° IZ ,.°✓ � I I IIII ILL I o Iw ^^ I I� I IIII m III I ol I I- I IIII I �a I to N 89' 19' 32" E 135.00' IIII IIII � III I jN �, i �i Ilj III N 89- 19' 32• E 135_00' LOT 2 r Nod .E IIII II IIII I III .am i0 Im x 1 NTURE.F. I I B n r I K RF =I673C00 � I IIII I I B i n� j- ® O I� �� I IIII LL ® w;,y r �e -� ✓ I�. � I IIII � IB; III I o N 89' 19' 32" E 135.00' - _ 3 A III I— � ­� f N.lo� I � � .1 oE, I I IIII I III I --- I _ LOT 3 -- 10 I'I- o JDH BENCHMARK.. o II' FUNRE ....•. o ly,® I` ® EF E31- �_av� "]°« ' RESIDENCE Be IL.F=67aDD „:"o I la�la '�-�a,u 72­ 89' IT 32 E 135.00 I IIII ^ nLI�I ® \� O4 g rE=B�I j N LEGEND � I I IIIIW I IIII II � I y�®�> E w7N9� III ®z sw N� wrou IIII I ® 9u0CH NNYN o R,=Ix ]m Pnnmtl9n 6umy BN WEBTOU FF tf WATER SEANCE BOY r 1 fn,nn"n TArz1N9 O� [FII 11•�aT a =KAq TMm91n n Msl �, v M m Po to Nawa�. MNe 3 •l ¢ SIORu [9ERf —� . 3 ,3 u9ei, Pns E '", _ — sr� rtAT' R - —]I wn OPN THIS IS A PREUMIN4RY PLAT OF NO LEGAL EFFECT, AND *E,x N %14U NOT BE RECORDED „ONCE BENCHMARK: I r__ ortCR uu W 1 EtD MONUABY� SwAtE 3 •tee Ammw, f—_ 4B0]-,3 pIREO,ION SaRfnCE gLNNM.E /ll FASENCNIS AS RCQURED BY VOIIlY CWP.4vR5 I Naas na B] t0 Snuce .1I1 -�.—,�. FENCE OfaflISYN15 ARC M FEET I]N Aff M BE CWPURD BY A ELLV"1qN=fi63.93 .. B REg51ERC0ILMYS LINO 3UMEYOR I 4 1• t0 LE^.. DESCRD'1'ION NOTES BEING A RESUBDMSION OF LOTS 1 2 3 AND 4 IN BLOCK 26 IN H. M. CORNELL COMPANY'S BRIARWOODS, A RESUBDNISION OF BLOCKS 4, 6, 7, B, Preto dw mnuee exo emn,cwm", Fli "Tecaaan°eonwee Plan mua e.:ud�ne mr 1. ALL EXISTING UDu1Y SERVICES MUSE RE TURF, NECIED AT THEIR RESPELifvE MN np rgorprr�rean9 Pssene nnresumn•men9e neNvrton PRIOR TO THE OEMOITIION OF AN! STRUCTURE. 9, 11 AND 12, LOTS 1 TO 24, BOTH INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 20, BLOCKS 21, •m.. rare or air. o•O nor rre�•rt R., on cWwl.mr1R r••on 22 25, 26, 27, 28 AND 29 IN H.O. STONE AND COMPANYS ADDITION TO e.e'o•Im..lrcunueea In me anhr.pe pMe mreaae•e ••e ppgmrmmro•o 2. PPEYENI SOIL EROSION AR SOON u POSSIBLE AFTER OL5111RBWCF. Mn •INe a•Mar�na4Pmek em nwrtch n (w'uma. role pra'eec6enlrpr DEERFIEID IN SECTIONS 28 AND 29, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST auprc to In:I ea o-am tou aranlpnmrm J. ERECT EROSION AND SEDIMENT LDNTRoL uEA6URE6 PRIOR TO ANr N OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN LAKE COUNTY. ILLINOIS. .rceWtlm nmpt.e.pnor.a 6Y me r�m.p.e•el•or CONSTRULTON/GRADING. -_ ._ wterlmnOl emrr„.a.Ier reo nHr.e•Itr.ar pmpe.eap.j.t rewnamemroa..lreuan. 4. NO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SH4L BE OPEMTEA OR CONSTRUCTION I-EsKS OR EXCAVATED MATEPoAL STORED OUTSIDE OF THE EONSTRVCTOx AREA OR IN AREAS OF Tne Pn:rv•tlap r Ba6 WfbTCLItF EXISTNC TREES. 6. ALL OISIURBEO PAR"WAY —N AREAS SNALL BE RESTCRED WITH 6• 10P 1_ MD SOD. ALL SOD MUST BE WATERED AS REOUIREO TO 6U6TNN GROWTH. Nvm. OFAN F mPln n 6. STORM SERVICE SHALL BE SIX-INCH (6-) P.V.L.. SDR 36. �T 7. S<NLFARY SEWER SETMCE SNALL BE SIX-INCH (6') P.N.C. SOB 26. 45 A SANRMY SEWER SERWCE CIEWDUR, WITH A WAIFATGHT SCREW -DOWN CAP, S- 38 18 Din M1kNe 1 ] X BE MWIDED TEN -FOOT (10') FROM THE OUTSIDE FACE OF BUILDING FOUNwTON. J2 1 1 x B. WATER SURFCE SHALL BE ONE AND ONE-NA.F INCH (INS COPPER TYPE W. 30 6 B X 9. TREE PROTECTION FENCNG TO BE PLACED PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. ]OB BENCHMARK: Y• E.LE in ED L N FAST I' utl'4 fIfVATON•669.I6 --FW --___--_—____— — — t,-E :M RGATE TERRACE - B y x, — J� __ 89, 19 32„ E �104.6 6..ell'. - ,;I I�' I � __.r.e_ _ ��,��. � ;r. 'y.6•��on.'�=�a� ,. LEI°m�'�� I I � _ jJ� lJd Jeuv-I __ �,a�__—�` J, `'a' ''��LV� •• � I I � J ti" -= I I IIIII � �j I I ' ` I� m� .J�y> LOT 1 • I 1 ��E/ "'� I I I I I \ °III .. 18 326 S F. I Ile { I ,•. �' I �I � III I _j I IJJ�>�gs — I `o l�—T✓;- —y --�—, @ I �` DIT"e w'a 1 4" Lu I I ,tom �� N I� ,• �.� i ��� st a Q IIIII 1g l6r \ zr I �•in N 89' 19' 32. E'—' 135 00' I I ( uw 3+a F (C)NNECT xI Is a Lu T 1932 E � 13500_ ".a ,,i''•a�l Lu II I r' ��^ •'i. i' l o u. I �/ % / °' �'� fe /�/d o qss: 1 ,'1 "� I ev s• U, sw Q 9 T. I e✓// � TOB ssncesnursR: o ] 125 .. o _ �/; FUTU RE 6ENGE n�T°wu.z,e suwee i tl I . wra'y ws „ I ,i >s sl,•z I „ I� r I , IIII o (ill J• I' SOURCE BBNCHMARK / 9 V , *� , 'e1� I WDACE a DEfliFELD DxUM!N' • !1 � �a44 R°M-IS -_e _- .' )• �" 1{ I FIEVAlION-fi66.9] NVD .s U 89' 19 32 I•- LEGEND ",DUN •r ' �WOo 4 Jo f 1 G j `dll a I. j ©an 0.1 CE WYDW. W�DrA o IIII ll ® o 11 P � Tx•Wnrcmtlan OumY tlL WFS1GLIW Ex£raHFaA Iu. ¢ tl� N-ter. F-1 I� IDBtO YDGp F nrruln � —�-- SwMRr SEWFA —�-- F� Auvn ustlen— Pne 6 L10j I-- SURFACE OP.VruGE �— 11 — wOtlIFAD WRF�SI 9 J W Na"lxs—Orr—vN FE"a .. 11 1T C 1. xn" CHW" TIN "FE"CE L C—C ..AL DESERIPTmN BEING A RESUBOMSION OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 IN BLOCK 26 IN H. M. CORNELL COMPANY'S BRIARWCOOS, A RESUBDMSION OF BLOCKS 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 AND 12. LOTS 1 TO 24, BOTH INCLUSIVE. IN BLOCK 20, BLOCKS 21, 22 25, 26. 27, 28 AND 29 IN H.O. STONE AND COMPANY'S ADDITION TO DEERFIELD IN SECTIONS 28 AND 29, TOWNSHIP 43 NORTH, RANGE 12, EAST OF THE THIRp PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TneP —m-—v u elg Gnmm� 11•eEeT m Tn.6zE Ibmrzl I�_ MG Nv. Namz Fam nmin n Mexez 26 33 &In,im, EM 4 J 2J J2 6 Bucke,c ] % ! JOB BENCNILARK: .,.-,., D'JBDE O x iFOOF m xuE ix E Sr -- a ,.a7_ttrvnmx_e-- .._— :1•s ---_—------7 _---_ &�- 1—�11ARGATE TRRACE - L-�� --- ' Io - - l"°II 89• 19' �2" E 104.6 - ---`:T� 4 -- \� �._ I + 'l�,r• . _�,.- LOT 1 °,_-' � � ,t- °+� I �II�� � ��j � I II o Ir t .•.r - ' r f�i I� y�4 s: r. - .t i a,'i �I ��L �+.,. >�®+ I LL I: Ai�I�aLL I •o I� r i I wl2 _ ri I W IIII I W III I I o b v, � � I ter+ _ 1 n •m' �..r •- - �. - � a�'�•lI li�iL" � � $I Noll/ a N 89' 19' 32- E"-- s 135 00' n _ p � r' r<' a + ;«` � • /� �.2 I �y IIII r �I ! e N 89' 19' 32" 'E+ 43500' 1 a>I g 1p4k' J' LOT z 1�a rat III' O k< 10.125 S.F. P _ III Isle ^FUTURFr 1„ 1 . RESIDENCE IM°' tallll�IIIIIIjf,I, ryf, �, a ni0` k�F' I 673_-,,�+Z LI CU, o I� U. a o �U. d�,. '�`' h �� � -J III ® —.. IIIP 1�3 III $' � � � 111I v~i II I I a I 6NlE DYP%H) N -19' 32" E 135.00' "_�"+ \�` ",.! `'•,j W A II I 'IIII Ij - — loll �xom SE :�; (��• III j •°' x � I I i o❑ _�' a' � , % � � .. � I o0 5 S�I�,°ww-IOB ll BENCHMARK— I' FUTURE& -MD _•� :1'' rn. •`+ RESIDENCE •,., .. J,o F.=s7ap0 „Ir,, IztIa -I- b 1 e y m•; •I I --•s= __ ,per °'.w 87,19-:.32 LEGEND IIIIW III I ---------- COMOUR I''fll•,UIJ, � `'�`V.,,a I p s,DxM MuaxD� O GTCN B Sx, Tm Pnzem6m 61mY lUlFf L ❑ Tf {'j WATEfl SEIMCE BD% ® +VAULT It-�aT� FlxE � TAG Xo. ImW DFAq F imin nmw•tl Inc 1 UxU POLE a � 3 74 i] w�M�^PNe 4 4 _ ... A � A c1°i F¢ -i STGRu LY,LVFM — Gx,IARf SEWER z,-' STGRMFHFR 75 i0 NYav 54 ,6 17 , a n 5 Amaicen Elm- J 10 Mowa THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PUT OF NO LEGAL EFFECT, AND- SHALL NOT BE RECORDED SOURCE BEN CAtdARK: OEEflRFm 1gxuMlllj .iOr �, 1 - s „s r_- Dxcx �''•� .1A 62 1. 6P ce- 4 D ALL FAiGExlS AS REOu✓tED x/ Uf1U,Y COVPA41Es All gYEN5pN5 IAE W {EEC /NO MC ID 6E —TA ras reru auras w o s mna 200i_IJ EIEYATAfI.665.9] e �--- OR—suxEACE D.— = - - - FENLE Public Comment #1 Daniel Nakahara From: Lauretta Reising <laurettamreising@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2021 11:27 AM To: Plan Commission Comment Cc: Daniel Nakahara Subject: [PUBLIC COMMENT] Westcliff Lane Resubdivision Proposal I would like to voice my deep concerns regarding the proposed changes to the current zoning protections on 924 and 936 Westcliff Lane as requested by Mr. Ted Kuczek. By definition, zoning restrictions are put in place to "prevent new development from interfering with existing uses and/or to preserve the character of a community." By granting Mr. Kuczek his request to put three houses on a piece of land that has for years held two, the village is violating the protections set forth in current zoning regulations as they relate to that location. The only parties that benefit are clearly Mr. Kuczek, the developers and the Village through increased tax revenue. These are short term monetary only gains which will at some point be greatly offset by the considerable environmental damage, exponential stress on the current sewer system and most importantly, the negative impact this decision would have on those living adjacent to this proposed block of houses. The Planning Commission must weigh all of these factors equally when debating this issue. For the past several years construction of massive homes on plots of land never intended to deal with such structures has been allowed with no restrictions on maintaining adequate green space to absorb run-off from the structure. You need only to look to the city of Houston to see what this lack of oversight has resulted in- massive flooding and damage in the billions of dollars. I have lived in this area for over two decades and witnessed the streets flooding after heavy downpours because the sewer system cannot keep up. Water has risen to the middle of my front and back lawns due to continued substitution of grass for cement. This is the new norm and the Planning Commission must recognize and adapt to the human and monetary costs associated with overdevelopment. The proposed zoning change is the definition of overdevelopment. We are in a "Code Red" of climate crisis with no indication of a reversal. Our children and grandchildren will be left with a dystopian environment of oppressive heat and massive downpours that was brought about by our "excesses." By continuing to eliminate even more greenspace and cutting down tree after tree to make room for oversized houses the Village only exacerbates this problem. The Planning Commission should and must modify its thinking towards future development in Deerfield to try to mitigate and mend the effects of new construction has on our environment. We cannot think and act like we did twenty years ago. Granting this exemption to Mr.Kuczek is reckless and a thumbing of the nose to the neighbors behind his current residence who will deal with flooded yards, basements and a deterioration in their quality of life that the loss of shade and privacy these three new homes would result in. These people have rights and for too long, developer's needs and wants have overshadowed the needs and wants of current homeowners. Mr. Kuczek has already built a large new home in a different county with acreage and orchards. He will enjoy a wonderful quality of life free from the fear of flooding and invasion of privacy not to mention a very fat bank account that came on the backs of his former neighbors. This proposal is born of pure greed.lt does nothing to better Westcliff Lane and Margate Terrace- in fact, it destroys the current leafy, spacious aesthetic of the street. That corner will look like a dense city landscape if Mr. Kuczek's wish is granted. I hope the Planning Commission looks past the immediate tax boost and acts in the best interests of the environment and the current residents of this neighborhood. Thank you for your time. Regards, Lauretta M. Reising 924 Oxford Road Public Comment #2 Daniel Nakahara From: Mary Anne Jackson <sales@myownmeals.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2021 7:58 PM To: Plan Commission Comment Cc: Daniel Nakahara Subject: [PUBLIC COMMENT] Subdivision 924 Westcliff proposal Attachments: 4382.065-Drainage_FINAL Revised_01232019.pdf, Actions Required July 2021.docx; Attachment #1 Pipe installation 2003.pdf; Attachment #2 Greengard Repo rt2003.pdf; Attachment #3 Morris pipe inlet 2018 jpg; Attachment #4 Margate Storm Pipes As- Existing.pdf; Attachment #5 Overland Flow Oxford to Meadowbrook Ln.pdf; Attachment #6 Construction Elevations323 Ramsay.pdf, Attachment #8 Permit Blockages.pdf Please find the following attachments necessary for evaluation for this proposal. 1. the 4382.065 Drainage Final Revised 01232019.pdf file. This is the drainage study commissioned by the Village of Deerfield showing that the current storm sewer pipes and system on Margate are inadequate for the existing subdivisions currently in place as of today. It shows that the cost to fix this inadequacy ranges from about $1.2 million to about $2.9 million as of 2019 to fix. Any further subdivision in this area would require the Village to first fix the existing shortfall. Any further subdivision would make the issue worse until these pipes and systems are fixed as the Village study shows. Therefore, no further subdivision could and should be authorized without first authorizing the expenditures to fix the existing shortages shown in the study and then add further to the work for the additional subdivision. 2. A copy of an analysis we did with our own independent engineers seeking to find a temporary solution, and our experiences reported to the Village to mitigate the existing system shortfall to help in the short term. Any further subdivision consideration would need to consider this information after the storm sewer capacity is increased as the Village study indicates must be done, and this document is also considered. Thank you. Please let me know if you have further questions. Mary Anne and Joseph D'Onofrio 330 Margate Ter Deerfield, IL 60015 847-948-1118 work 1 Actions Required Contact Info: 847-948-1118 August 3, 2021 majackson@mvownmeals.com This report is presented to Village Management and its consultants for required action. URGENCY: HIGH Four Issues To Be Resolved; And Removal of 2003 Drainage Solution for 373 Ramsay: These issues are Village created, or at the very least approved, drainage problems, that the Village can and must resolve, or at the very least mitigate. 1. Fence constructed on 320 Margate property under Village approval, which continues to block the flow of overland storm drainage water at the corner where 323 Ramsay, 373 Ramsay, 330 Margate and 320 Margate meet. (see also #4 issue below). 2. Elevated landscaping on the 320 Margate and 323 Ramsay property combination which blocks water even if it can flow under the fence. This was to be resolved in our permit applications (not approved) for 320 Margate, 330 Margate, 323 Ramsay and 373 Ramsay properties, and can now be resolved with new permits for that property. It also blocks overland drainage flow from Oxford Road to Meadowbrook Lane. See page 5 #2 for specifics. 3. Backflow preventer requirement to prevent drainage water from surging with force into 342 Margate and 330 Margate properties. 4. Pipe Installed in 2003 on 320 Margate Property installed solely to remove excess impervious area drainage from 373 Ramsay Road. The Village required the 373 Ramsay property to contour landscaping to flow to this pipe. This volume and contouring needs to be included in plans (not included in 2002 Plat Survey used for area south of new home construction — page 22 of permit documentation). For details of this pipe, see Attachment #1 as approved in 2003 and included in 2017 as -built and permit application documents. Important Note: It does not matter what the paper shows, it matters where the water flows. We have provided videos and documents to the Village proving that the natural overland flow is and has been blocked at 320 Margate/323 Ramsay property where the drainage basin area used to exist. Whereas the documents the Village has shows overland flow between these two properties (see Appendix), the elevated land on 320 Margate/323 Ramsay forces the drainage to flow backwards into our property with extreme force instead of flowing overland as the Village records show it does. We presented this video to the Village as evidence showing the effect of the blockage creating rapids flowing backward in a river of drainage water. h"os://www.dro;)box.com/s/cl lx6h'8xact5rm/5°/a2OBackyard.MOV?dl=0 County Tax Valuation Transfer: For as long as this is permitted to exist, the entire reduced value of our property can be transferred to increase the tax -basis valuation of the 320 Margate/323 Ramsay property because the Village permitted them to fill-in the overland drainage basin and to remove the drainage pipe described above. There is no tax loss to the county. Clarifying Expectations with this Proposal: In a May 13, 2021 email, the Village said there is no easy "fix" and only can be improved via an expensive new storm sewer pipe on Margate; however, this "fix" will not be done due to costs. (See copy of email content following). Page 1 Drainage/Actions Required July 2021.docx Actions Required August 3, 2021 Contact Info: 847-948-1118 maiackson myownmeals.com This proposal is NOT to fix the drainage problem but rather to reduce the damage it now causes, and for which the Village has the authority and power to execute at minimal expense. The end result expectations are: (1) that the overland flow on 320 Margate/323 Ramsay will be opened back up to as it was prior to 2017/2018; to allow drainage and storm water to flow overland as it has for more than 44 years via removing Village -permitted blockages; and (2) that storm water will be prevented from being forced under pressure into, and surrounding, the home which started with 2017/2018 storms. We seek to allow it to again flow overland as it had for more than 40 years. Village Email: (May 13, 2021) As we've discussed on numerous occasions, we are aware of what is happening and what needs to be done to alleviate the surcharging of the system. This improvement requires the installation of a new large diameter storm sewer down Margate and out to the creek. It is a large project that will take appropriate planning and funds to complete. There is no silver bullet fix within this intersection that can replicate this new pipe. Specific Arguments and Information: Refer to the Appendix for specifics, supporting documentation, references to attachments, and documents from the Village. Village Actions Required: (1) Install backflow preventers in the storm inlets in front of 342 Margate Terrace to reduce the surcharged (pressurized) storm water at that location, and (2) correct landscaping issues blocking overland storm water flow allowed under permits issued for 320 Margate Ter/323 Ramsay Road property demolition and construction, (3) if 12" pipe on 320 Margate property is cut 95 feet, show how and where the excess drainage flow from 373 Ramsay Road drainage is accommodated by the new drainage plans. Storm Drainage Study: The Village commissioned a consulting firm to perform a Village - wide drainage study evaluating the storm water system "as -exists" on or about January 1, 2021, to find drainage solutions, the scope of which includes evaluating: 1. Existing storm sewer piping, capacity and flow (all pipes to be included), 2. Overland drainage systems that exist in neighborhoods like Meadowbrook, 3. Village -wide overland drainage flow and volume. Missing from this project's scope, we believe, is the consideration of the volume and pressure of surcharged (pressurized) water flow from Oxford storm sewers (24- and 36-inch dual pipes) at the inlets in front of 342 Margate Terrace: At the April 29th online meeting with our engineers and Public Works, Mr. Scott Anderson asked Mr. Robert Phillips to quantify the calculated water volume of the surcharged water at this point. Mr. Phillips stated that the quantity was not calculated or quantifiable, and not available from the consultants' computer model. Also missing is the overland drainage flow basin area from Oxford Road to Meadowbrook Lane in backyard private properties between Margate Terrace and Ramsay Road. This is where the Village records show drainage water is supposed to flow but is now being blocked, yet is curiously missing from engineering studies. Page 2 Drainage/Actions Required July 2021.docx Actions Required August 3, 2021 Contact Info: 847-948-1118 majackson@myownmeals.com For ease of reading and understanding, hereinafter in this document, we will refer to the joint property at 323 Ramsay Road and 320 Margate Terrace as "323/320". Existing Conditions Visual Representation: Surcharge Requiring Backflow Preventer We offer a simple visual demonstration of what is happening and what needs to be addressed, by using a garden hose with a "wide" opening and a hose "limiter" with a smaller opening. See https://www.dropbox.com/s/1taxdx5Ahx5b18z/Pressure%20items%20Photo.heic?d1=o and httos://www.dropbox.com/s/ltaxdx5phx5bl8z/Pressure%20items%20photo.heic?dl=0 to see the parts used. See Video#1 to see the impact depiction: httos://www.dropbox.com/s/2r9zb7rl6epsah3/Video°/a20Jun%2011 °/a2C%208%2041 %2024°/a20AM.mov?d1=0 1. Water flowing at full force through a pipe with a relatively wide opening discharges in a strong flow as shown through the use of the garden hose. (Video 1) 2. Water flow becomes pressurized when constricted and forced into a smaller opening outlet. Demonstrated by adding a limiter nozzle in the video 1. a. Turning the flow of water to the exact same strength as in #1, yet now constricted by a limiter, the pressure of the outflow in terms of force, strength and distance, SUBSTANTIALLY increases. (Video 1) 3. The water flow, which is now under pressure due to the constriction added: a. Discharges with a substantial increase in force, b. Discharges to a much greater distance, c. Discharges with more strength than without the limiter. Video#1: Hose Depiction of Existing Village Storm Sewer Piping Situation During a 2" rainstorm, drainage water enters the two inlets located in front of 342 Margate and flows downstream to the Oxford storm pipes. When the Oxford pipes are surcharged, the water is forced back upstream, its flow constricted at the manhole junction where multiple pipes converge to build pressure. Then water exits the inlets with such force that it creates a rushing river effect into the 342 and 330 Margate driveways and home. The actual Village sewer limiter, as depicted in Video 1 that builds pressure is that manhole junction. This limitation point forces water under pressure to come out as a fountain with force and increased distance immediately, instead of over time. Specifically, there are four (4) main drainage pipes converging at one single function creating this pressure, and a fifth pipe with some added impact which directly connects to an inlet. Let's follow the flow of surcharged, storm -sewer water from Oxford Road Village pipes. First, surcharged water from the Oxford 24" (or 36") pipes flow backward, upstream on Margate into a 21" Margate pipe, already at some level of pressure. This storm sewer water becomes further pressurized when the 21" Margate pipe connects at a manhole junction (corner of Margate and Westcliff) where three additional, smaller pipes all meet and act as limiters as depicted in the video. Page 3 Drainage/Actions Required July 2021.docx Actions Required Contact Info: 847-948-1118 August 3, 2021 maiackson(cDmyownmeals.com At this single junction: See Attachment #4 showing the point where pressure builds. a. The 21" pipe on Margate from Oxford connects to the manhole junction. b. A 15" pipe east of this manhole on Margate joins and connects, bringing storm water from both the homes east of this junction, AND the storm water from the Village's storm sewer pipe system on Beverly (12"). c. A 12" pipe connects at this junction bringing storm water flowing from south to north from Westcliff drains and overland flow captured in this pipe. d. An 8"-pipe diagonally connects at this manhole junction bringing water from a second manhole at 346 Margate where a private property drainage system and Village inlet water flows. Connecting Reality to the Visual 1. At this one manhole junction, the convergence of all of the above four (4) connections become "limiters" causing the amount of storm drainage volume descending upon this single point to build significant pressure. (The 4 are the 21", 15", 8", 12" pipes at ONE junction.) 2. As demonstrated in the visual representation video, the smaller the outlet size, the stronger (a) the force, (b) the pressure and (c) the distance the water is propelled. 3. That water under pressure continues to build as it is forced to the inlets in front of 342 Margate. Water under pressure seeks the largest sized outlet pipe for "relief', which on Margate is the 15" pipe. 4. Once forced under pressure into the 15" pipe, it seeks further relief where now the only "relief' left is the two inlets. a. With the pressure behind it, the storm water surges with high velocity and force creating a geyser from the storm inlets into the street which is then jettisoned into the driveways. b. Further adding to the pressure, the inlet at the driveway at 342 Margate has an additional 8" pipe connecting what appears to possibly be storm water drainage from 342 Margate. c. (Note: Deerfield Public Works said it does not know the purpose of this pipe and that connections are not typically authorized or made from private drainage pipes to inlets; they are rather connected to manhole junctions. What we do know is that the prior owners of 342 Margate told me that they had an easement in the middle of their front yard. Perhaps this pipe is the reason for the easement. The Village must determine what the easement and this pipe is for prior to approving any permit for demolition or construction at this vacant home.) d. See Attachment #4 for the Village records of the pipes provided to us by DPW. Note that DPW erroneously modified the flow arrow of the storm water flow from the Village records and we corrected this to what the Village record actually shows. e. The pressurized storm water is then propelled into the 342 and 330 Margate Terrace driveways with strength and force creating a rushing river current effect. (See Video #2) https://www.dropbox.com/s/wzbhc;18s;ufOb62/4%20Front%2ODoor%20view.MOV?di=0 Again note that this water is being blocked by the fence and more importantly, the elevated landscaping blocking the natural overland flow that the Village has in its documents. Page 4 Drainage/Actions Required July 2021.docx Actions Required Contact Info: 847-948-1118 August 3, 2021 maiackson myownmeals.com Village Further Added Volume to Margate's Overly -Taxed Storm Sewer System In 2003, the Village installed a special manhole connection specifically and solely to bring the additional overland storm water caused by 373 Ramsay Road's increased impervious area to the Village's 15" Margate pipe. (See Attachment #1 from Village records) a) This 12" pipe's original purpose was to take excess overland storm water from 373 Ramsay Road property new construction (north of 330 Margate Ter and west of 323/320) to the Margate 15" pipe. It was deemed slightly undersized to handle a 2-hour storm per the Village's hired Greengard Engineering report, to address all the increased impervious from new construction. (See Attachment #2) b) Side note: We know the original purpose was for the 373 Ramsay excess water from the impervious area addition because we were involved at the time. In 2003, the Village Public Works asked me to provide it with a 10-foot easement to allow the pipe to be built on our property and so that the Village could have access to it. This would have required tree removal and would have prohibited us from future construction on our property. c) Since we had never had any storm water flow into or build up in our backyard, we refused. See statement in Attachment #2 last page. d) Thus, it was constructed on the 323/320 property with an 8-foot easement required (never recorded) to support and to be used as authorization for the Village to install the special manhole. The 323/320 property was lower in elevation to our property so a pipe inlet could only be 5.52" below the manhole entry point. With the pipe being 153 feet, its slope decline to the manhole was rather flat. e) It is most useful AFTER a storm when the Margate storm pipes clear. At that point, the inlet is like a tub drain and the water built up at 323/320 corner can drain. See more information in the Appendix. And see Attachment #3 for photo of pipe inlet. 2. AFTER a storm, this 12" pipe also eventually takes all of the overland drainage that does not flow out of 323/320 on its east side. This flow area starts at Oxford Road and ends at Meadowbrook Lane flowing between the following properties (See Attachment #5): a. On Margate: 400, 346, 342, 330, 320 to 960 Meadowbrook Lane, and b. On Ramsay: 393, 385, 373, 323 to 1010 Meadowbrook Lane. c. Refer to the GHA Project # 4382.065 dated January 2019, Exhibit 1. Linked here: htt;ps://www.dro:box.com/s/ggnkltm5skrdc6s/4382.065 Drainaae FINAL%20Revised 01232019.odf?di=0 As seen in Attachment #5, the elevations depicted from Oxford go from 675 to 670 to 669 to 665 to 663 at Meadowbrook Lane in this drainage flow area. d. This is the overland flow cited as issue #2 at the beginning of this document. e. It is currently blocked on 323/320 property in the corner where 330 Margate, 373 Ramsay, 323 Ramsay and 320 Margate converge. f. The GHA study was deficient in that it failed to show the overland flow that actually occurs between these properties shown on Attachment #5 (arrows added for clarity), and which can NOT be allowed to be blocked by the 323/320 Ramsay property's elevated landscape. See photo of impact of blockage by fence and elevated landscaping on other side of fence preventing drainage after a storm. htt;�s://www.dro:)box.com/s/�54435r r3bblxc5/Side and%20;-hoto.JPG?dl=0 Page 5 Drainage/Actions Required July 2021.docx Actions Required August 3, 2021 Contact Info: 847-948-1118 maiacksonCa�myownmeals.com 3. The Meadowbrook area is not legally intended to be part of the Margate Village storm sewer system because Meadowbrook area is designed to operate only utilizing private overland drainage systems. a) The Village purposefully and knowingly modified this drainage without accounting for it in any studies or reports, including the GHA report and the Village -wide study currently underway and which must be added immediately. Village Recommended We Raise our House as the solution. Mr. Bob Phillips told us to raise our house level since it is relatively flat with the street level as shown on our engineer's drawings. He said this was our best way to fix the problem since they do not intend to fix the storm sewer pipes proposed by the engineering studies. 1. We did check into this and found from the experts that other than lifting our home above the flooding flow, the blockage would still be there and the forced flooding, which would not actually accomplish very much if anything. 2. He specifically stated that the Village would not approve any new home construction to be relatively flat with the street any longer and in fact it would be required to be substantially above street level. 3. We know this is not true because the Village approved the construction of the new home where the land blockages were permitted at 323 Ramsay. See Attachment #6 which shows that the elevations of the approved new construction are relatively flat with the street. The street is about 667.98 to 667.47 while the front of the house is also in the 667.4, 667.1 and as high as 668 which is %" higher than street in some places. We effectively did elevate our house by building a wall and dirt berm around the house to protect from surging water and from backflow from the blocked land in the natural overland drainage path. What needs to be done by the Village? We have done everything in our power to resolve the Village issues without Village dollars or involvement, hiring our own engineer experts. We have responded to Village recommendations. All is privately funded by us. (Refer to the Appendix discussions and documentation references.) Now, the Village can and must positively impact the problem it basically created in many ways; what we recommend does not require the costs of a major construction project. The Village can do the three things we noted at the beginning of this report and as follows, with cost impacts noted: First, make sure that the 323/320 property has removed and lowered the landscape build up at the corner junction of the 373 Ramsay Road, 323/320, and 330 Margate Terrace properties — their backyards. There is no cost to the Village. a. The area under the fence must be cleared so that the overland drainage water will flow overland between the properties from Oxford to Meadowbrook Lane, specifically between: i. 400, 346, 342, 330, and 320 Margate to 960 Meadowbrook Lane and ii. 393, 385, 373, 323 Ramsay to 1010 Meadowbrook Lane. Page 6 Drainage/Actions Required July 2021.docx Actions Required Contact Info: 847-948-1118 August 3, 2021 maiackson(a)myownmeals.com b. We addressed this area in our two permit application proposals filed with the Village. c. The revised 2020 permit still remains pending at the Village. d. The first permit was approved but subsequently revised to replace the elevated sidewalk with a flood wall. This permit was applied for by owners at 373 Ramsay, 330 Margate, and 323/320 owners as a joint community "fix -it" project. (However, 323/320 subsequently dropped out to construct a tennis court in the area.) e. The 373 Ramsay property has lost 3 uprooted trees that were at least 45 years old due to blocked drainage by 323/320. f. The 330 Margate property backyard has been flooding (not just pooling but completely covered and flowing) for the first time in the 44 years we have lived there, occurring after the construction of the fence and the elevated landscaping. g. Since the 323/320 project is under construction, this presents the Village with the best means to correct these problems created by previously approved permits for fencing and landscaping. 2. Confirm the 323/320 property has removed and lowered its landscape along the west side fence, from the northern corner on Margate to past the area described in #1 above. With the construction of the pool and tennis court, the Village can make sure this is properly resolved, assuring any blockages to the drainage are removed so that: a. storm water will flow through the backyards from Oxford to Meadowbrook Lane as it has historically done. b. and south to northeast and east, (Margate to the drainage ditch area) as it historically does and is depicted on Village studies. There is no cost to the Village 3. Finally, install a backflow preventer to the inlets in front of 342 Margate. It is inexpensive and relatively easy according the municipality articles I have read, and when compared with having to install more than a million dollars of repairs to the existing system. The Village has argued: a. Backflow preventers do not work, yet it requires every resident with a sprinkler system to install one. I would argue they must work and with every resident sprinkler system required to install one, not likely expensive. b. It will cause more harm downstream on Oxford, yet the Village cannot quantify the volume of water to justify that this is true. (See Appendix for more discussion). c. If the Backflow preventers do not work, why would it affect anyone downstream on Oxford? Both arguments cannot be true. d. The Village cannot argue that installation of backflow preventers will affect storm water downstream because there is a second set of inlets about 50+ feet west of the ones in front of 342 Margate. Thus, backflow preventers will not change the volume, just the pressure, force and energy with which storm water is jettisoned from the inlets into private property, driveways, backyards etc. e. Instead of being forced under pressure out from the inlets in front of 342 Margate as shown in the video, it would come out in the second set of inlets about 50+ feet west of these inlets, also on Margate. Page 7 Drainage/Actions Required July 2021.docx Actions Required Contact Info: 847-948-1118 August 3, 2021 malacksonC6 yownmeals.com f. "Popping up" via the inlets 50 feet to the west of the current inlets will reduce the limiter -effect of that single congested manhole causing the force, distance jettisoned and fountain ing-effect. Summary. 1. The Village needs to relieve the pressure built up in the two inlets in front of 342 Margate's driveway, so that water is not jettisoned into that driveway and then into 330 Margate driveway. This jettisoned, pressurized drainage water from surcharged pipes on Oxford Road then surrounds the 330 Margate house, garage, and entire backyard, and pools at 373 Ramsay's drainage ditch area due to blockages by 323/320. 2. The Village very clearly needs to address the 323/320 landscape built-up drainage -flow blockage after the fence installation which blocks the flow of the waterjettisoned by these inlets, causing water to flood and flow backwards (more than pool) at both the 330 Margate and 373 Ramsay properties. 3. The Village needs to address and calculate how the excess impervious area from the 2003 construction at 373 Ramsay (behind our home) will be removed to prevent flooding if the 12" pipe at 323/320 is cut 95 feet back from the corner of the 4 properties where it was installed to remove this excess drainage water (refer again to Greengard report). The inlet will be 95 feet away from the corner where all the drainage is to flow with no pipe inlet to remove the pooling or back -flow. Nowhere is this excess drainage water being addressed or calculated in any documents or engineering studies. 4. The Village needs to clearly show and account for in all engineering studies, the flow of storm water in the drainage area from Oxford Road to Meadowbrook Lane between Margate Terrace and Ramsay Road properties. At this time, this flow is being blocked by the elevated landscaping at 323/320 and not included in drainage and engineering studies. The Village has a fiduciary responsibility to require the removal of blockages to overland drainage it clearly knows continues to exist and as were permitted as the result of the 332/320 home constructed in 2017 & 2018. It also must remove the pressurized jettisoning of surcharged water downstream from Oxford Road from continuing to cause damage. Failure to do implement these minor -cost and no -cost solutions would likely be nonfeasance by the Village, in our opinion. We have lived here in this home for about 44 years and know the history and problems. Remember, It does not matter what the paper shows; it matters where the actual water flows. Mary Anne & Joseph D'Onofrio 330 Margate Terrace Purchased this home in December 1977 Page 8 Drainage/Actions Required July 2021.docx MEMORANDUM To: Robert Phillips — Village of Deerfield Tyler Dickinson — Village of Deerfield From: Jodi McCarthy — GHA Kevin Belgrave — GHA Cc: File; GHA Project #: 4382.065 Date: January 23, 2019, updated January 29, 2018 Subject: Margate Terrace Drainage Investigation Deerfield, IL 1 GRALT HAMIUMN m ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Hills, IL 60061 TPr. 947,478,9700 0 FAx 847.47$.9701 www.gba-engineers.com The residents of 330 Margate Terrace in the Village of Deerfield have reported frequent localized flooding. The house is located on the north side of Margate Terrace, between Westcliff Lane and Beverly Place. A comprehensive drainage study of this area of concern was conducted to assess flooding and evaluate potential stormwater infrastructure that would be required to mitigate the flooding issues. 1. Existing Conditions The general topography of the area slopes from the west to the east towards the Middle Fork of the North Branch of the Chicago River. Margate Terrace, between Westcliff Lane and Meadowbrook Lane, is very flat, and the area sheet flows north to the rear yards of the houses on Margate Terrace. The flow continues to travel east through the rear yards as shown in Exhibit 1. The grades adjacent to the structure at 330 Margate Terrace are approximately 1' below the pavement elevations on Margate Terrace. Margate Terrace is a curb and gutter roadway served by storm sewer. At the location of concern, a 15" diameter storm sewer within the roadway conveys the neighborhood drainage to the west into a 21" diameter sewer. A 12" storm sewer line, located near the western property line of 320 Margate Terrace, captures flow from the rear yards and conveys it into the Margate Terrace storm sewer. The Margate Terrace storm sewer also conveys the drainage from Kingston Terrace, Beverly Place, and Westcliff Lane to a larger storm sewer system on Oxford Road. The Oxford Road storm sewer system is a network of parallel large diameter storm sewer lines that flow north to Warwick Road and then east to outlet to the Middle Fork of the North Branch of the Chicago River. The network captures over 95 acres in the immediate area shown on Exhibit 2, as well as additional flow from the Warrington Road network. A hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the area of concern was performed using XPSWMM 2018 modeling software. XPSWMM was developed by the XP Software company for use in analysis, design, and simulation of storm and wastewater systems (XP Software, 2018). The XPSWMM model is a dynamic model able to compute hydrology and hydraulics simultaneously while accounting for backwater effects, time -varying flowrates, and pressurized flow. A detailed basin delineation was performed using 1-foot topographic contours from Lake County to determine the drainage area contributing to the storm sewer system. P:\4350-4399\4382.065 Deerfield Margate Terrace Drainage\Drainage\Memo to Village\4382.065_Drainage_Memc_012319.docx Margate Terrace Drainage Investigation January 23, 2019 GHA Project 44382.065 Page 2 of 4 XPSWMM uses several parameters to define the hydrologic and hydraulic elements. Following is a brief description of the parameters and assumptions used for modeling the study area. 1.1 Hydrologic Model Setup Hydrologic elements and parameters developed for use in the XPSWMM model included: • Drainage areas delineated based on 1-ft contours • Drainage system rims and inverts based on data obtained during field survey and observations • Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Curve Number (CN) methodology used for rainfall abstractions • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Technical Release 55 (TR-55) methodology used to compute Time of Concentration (Tc) • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), NRCS soil report for Lake County used to determine hydrologic soils group (HSG) type. HSG type D was used in the analysis • SCS Dimensionless Hydrograph methodology used for runoff hydrograph calculation • Percentage impervious and CN values were based on land cover for residential districts (1/2-acre lot and 1/3-acre lot), open area (parks and grass areas), and roadways • Huff rainfall distributions and rainfall depths obtained from Bulletin 71 (Huff & Angel, 1992) and used for synthetic rainfall distribution • Storm events simulated included the 2-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year events • Critical duration analysis performed with storm durations including 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-hr duration. 1.2 Hydraulic Model Setup Hydraulic elements and parameters used in the XPSWMM model included: • Storm system data (pipe lengths, inverts, size and material) obtained from Village atlas, engineering plans of improvements in the area, available survey data, and data from manhole scans. • Manholes, catch basins and ponds represented as nodes in the model, whereas storm sewer pipes were represented as links. • Dynamic wave routing method used for flow routing. • Manning's equation method used for pipe capacity and head loss calculation. • A free discharge was assumed for the outfall to the river. • A one-dimensional model was developed for simulation of flow routing through the storm sewer network. Based on the XPSWMM model setup, an Existing Conditions model was developed to simulate current conditions for the entire Margate Terrace and Oxford Road storm system. The critical duration for the storm system was 2-hour duration. The 10-year critical duration storm event was used for the storm sewer analysis. No downstream boundary condition at the Middle Fork of the North Branch of the Chicago River was considered as it is assumed that the storm sewer system will be functioning with no downstream flooding occurring during a 10-year event. Profiles of the existing storm sewer system can be found in Appendix A. A printout of the XPSWMM dynamic long sections were used to illustrate the results of the models in the storm r N' GEWAII' HAM19ON l.J r = ' ASSOCIATES, INC. Margate Terrace Drainage Investigation January 23, 2019 GHA Project #4382.065 Page 3 of 4 sewer line, starting at the flared end section of the 12" diameter pipe near the western property line of 320 Margate Terrace to a structure located north of the intersection of Westgate Road and Oxford Road. In the existing condition, there is a negative freeboard of -0.92' and -1.79' on Margate Terrace between Oxford Road and Beverly Place, meaning that in theory there is 0.92' and 1.79' of ponding in the street during the 10-year, 2-hour event. The 50-year, 2-hour event resulted in 1.0' and 2.4' of ponding in this location. Margate Terrace at this location is the lowest surface elevation of the system, with exception of the outlet. Since the topography for the area drains north, ponding on Margate Terrace above the top of curb results in water flowing east into 330 and 320 Margate Terrace and north to the rear yard overflow. The model illustrated that with the large tributary area draining to the system, the Oxford Road storm sewers north of the intersection of Oxford and Westgate are at full capacity during the storm event and cannot accept drainage from the tributary areas south of that intersection. Until the sewers north of Westgate and Oxford drain down, the upstream pipes have backward or stagnant flow. As a result, water ponds on Margate Terrace between Westcliff Land and Beverly Place. 2. Proposed Alternatives A Proposed Alternatives model was developed to evaluate multiple options to eliminate the ponding for the critical duration 10-year storm on Margate Terrace. In evaluating the entire storm sewer network, the following options were evaluated (Exhibits 2 through 2G): 1. Replace the existing 15" and 21" storm sewer on Margate Terrace from Oxford / Margate Terrace to 320 Margate Terrace with a 36" storm sewer (Exhibit 2A); 2. Divert the flow tributary from the storm sewer line on Westgate Road (offsite flow from Warrington Study, Tributary Areas #4 and #8) (Exhibit 2B); 3. Divert the flow tributary from the storm sewer line on Beverly Place (Tributary Areas #10 and 13) (Exhibit 2C); 3a. Divert the flow tributary from the storm sewer line on Beverly Place (Tributary Areas #10 and 13) and from the rear yards of Margate Terrace (Tributary Area #12) (Exhibit 2D); 4. Upsize the existing double storm sewer lines on Oxford to double 48" lines, from Margate Terrace to the outlet (Exhibit 2E); 5. Construct a separate storm sewer line on Warwick to capture the flow from Tributary Areas #2, 6, and 15 (Exhibit 2F); and 6. Construct a separate storm sewer line on Margate Terrace to convey the backflow from the Oxford system to the Middle Fork of the North Branch of the Chicago River (Exhibit 2G). The Existing Conditions model was used at the baseline for the Proposed Alternatives model, and the results can be found in Appendix B. Options #2, 4, and 6 eliminated ponding on Margate Terrace during a 10-year, 2-hour storm event. All other proposed scenarios had significant ponding remaining on Margate Terrace, so they will not be further explored. r� I GEWALT HAMILTON l I w ASSOCIATES, INC. Margate Terrace Drainage Investigation January 23, 2019 GHA Project #4382.065 Page 4 of 4 To implement Option #2, a separate 42" storm sewer would be constructed to remove the flow tributary from the Westgate Road storm sewer to the Oxford Road storm sewer. This scenario assumes 1,700' of 42" storm sewer would be constructed along Oxford from Westgate to the outlet. While this is the shortest distance to the outlet, this path may not be feasible due to existing utility conflicts and other routes may need to be explored. To implement Option #4, the existing 24" and 36" storm sewer lines on Oxford Road, from the intersection of Margate Terrace to the outlet at the river, would be upsized to a double 48" diameter storm sewer. The distance between Margate Terrace and the outlet is 2,400', resulting in 4,800' of 48" diameter storm sewer. To implement Option #6, 2,500' of 36" storm sewer would be constructed from the intersection of Margate Terrace to the river along Margate Terrace / Manor Drive. Easements are located in this area, but it will need to be determined if their use if feasible. 3. Conclusion This drainage study evaluated the flooding issues on Margate Terrace in the Village of Deerfield by modeling the entire tributary area to the storm system along Margate Terrace and Oxford Drive until its discharge to the Middle Fork of the North Branch of the Chicago River. The model results show that Margate Terrace has ponding during the 10-year 2-hour event, as it is the lowest surface elevation in the storm sewer system. The potential alternatives to eliminate ponding during the 10-year event require the construction of long lengths of large storm sewers, with conceptual costs ranging from $1.3 to $2.9 million dollars. Table 1: Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost to Eliminate Ponding on Margate Terrace for the 10-year Critical Duration Event Option 02 Construct 1,700' of 42" separate storm sewer $1,267,000 line to divert flow from Warrington and Westgate Option #4 Replace existing storm sewer on Oxford with $2,917,000 double 48" storm sewer (2,400' each line) Construct 2,500' of 36" storm sewer from Option #6 Margate Terrace to Heather Lane to convey $1,333,000 backflow from Oxford Lane, where flow will discharge to the river 'This Engineer's Opinion of Probably Construction Cost (EOPCC) is based on a conceptual design, which requires additional investigation to determine feasibility of construction. The EOPCC does not account for the cost of possible land acquisition, easements, permits, utility relocation, or other factors. X ! �:, GEWAff EXHIBITS r .,g9 _ owe y°•f ati'� gl} 's n, y❑ :33 1 ; v 675 1 F[I ����. _ r r 75 Warrmkin R4J 8 bTg - ..87a - _ ;688• C'1 Dy] tCD � N � _gip. ��°.}• 79 °i: .8'• < s)3 675-�' '�s�) .6>) ,� - -- 67 r'. Knollwood Rd Q `,673 T 99 WMI i 4Lkk c u. ',y 5�9, !J; : 6 iSLr�'1 .,_, e3�Ll _a �,;- 675 WW E _gF� ,fit O Z f. } - - - Kenton Rd - - °��� _ * 67�1•..^ . -_ _-ter.' _3 - i.i sl�899 868 M� g -_ !rat y� G75 - 673 •i�'a _ Ki�,)Iinq Pi 9L9J- _ �.] 1 - _ •.i'! _ 0 9g9e669`-_ j<o U66- •iP,�� i_ ".�, 3� s�S: _. �j4 �: m �f�s�! '665.—,yam_ - r _? _.. - B7 - 672 - 67 'Oxford Rd m] Syr. ^, - ._ - '-� � �a �•. �.-��'t,. r. .4• v'L. - - 9 -- = ;e1d• _fir � . -.rl-� "' � - r"!`;6b1f .� fa S ZAP- CD tu Westcllf{}o Hamel <<; r n � ., �ar" ° m� s 656 C �r¢ T 62r',- -�6 a 699` S9 ¢N Beverly PI y m r j'y u. N ., � � F, '�_ 9L9 }� �. £g9_� O Q P- �R';680.'�.� - U1�oA eaw , &� 4V- fiq •9 593 !` - fir- _ !° `�i3 y - - ._ \V l�ea 4L9. COL m G7 c.l� I •'rn 4 B7B .�� _ r r � 0 9• 1 i 9 L9 Sr N� vn4= (D (A Na 0 rn z� c7 Z n u CD Cil (CD FC:) Kipling PI 11 m ai o c .( Q (Dc DO d-S o(D I. CD '0 I� o c v A, o �l< <D �' RD : o D CL A 3 w O� r m GN CD b o--� C � � 'm N � z m Vl i 0 P X 1 I 6f —i -PL a 2 N wv00 i Kenton Rd .� 8 3 -:P � N 0 a!`_a N 1v C'1 ,Warrington Rd --71 3 dm o t o a a � twoa I W of i Y th 00 � i11 n J N w - -- _ j I Kcollwoorl R{s N N 'C01N :2 t3 m+ N :y r m W A �� r_ A 0 ---Westcliff"Ln �a',�—�.� N Lns NJCD 3 co o v N � CD N 01 fD z Se�erly P! CL «� ❑ � s s M (D ( Q ill � (D eadowbrook Ln IIIIIIIIIIIIIIICa N -4o ic CD su (D w w (D ic CD Hamilton Ln m .a a. N Oxford -Rd X CA n, a _ id ass'�11e � r r f m � - (D o A cn — cn m R 0 CL fl1 ul a6P!b u0 D CD a (D �- sv CD APPENDIX A Existing Conditions Existing Conditions: 10-year Critical Duration (10-year, 2 Hr) Available Capacity of g 3(PSwMM2018.xp Dynamic Long Section Storm Sewer y,._ 0 I 0 I _' Actual Flow in Storm Sewer - Negative is a backflow 4" } tiiir + c� =� -I n ��� Base Scenario ActiveSubcatchments Close 'Ek Jr. tk-'. iifetalr� Dki&y d41 Tmue 93:00:43 step 4 ink MT FES Link MTE2 Link MTE1 :ia est 391; East 2 m2 Nest 42inl East 24inl 2.340 3,700 6.370 28220 11.880 I 40.520 11.540 Free Free Free Free Free Free Free I" Headi -4.408 6.802 14.198 17.817 6.535 79.003 17.813 Headi 664.322 667.846 .668.436 669.331 569331 668.849 668849 n 667.846 658.436 569.331 658.849 569.949 665.893 555:893 Gandltit Lthx A4I t1 3rWi4 iy.ti ZQ 3 4.4 148.E #1- Margate Terrace Yard Flared End E70.0 'r { 11 CE3. Hydraulic Grade Line Negative (-) means it is ponding above structure L #3 - Intersection of Margate Terrace and Westcliff i.01YU16Sti7I61C I.K i5 i!om i So Dt - rcUIC4(3f� L9NC r:IOlSE [l {: 565.7 7Fe4.2: 942.5 1131.3 1319.9 2F4#8.9 -- 1%7.0 10-year, 2 Hr Water #4 - Intersection of Surface Elevation Margate Terrace #5 - Intersection of and Oxford ; Oxford and Westgate Existing Ground - - - - - Storm Sewer i Storm Sewer #2 - Connection point of flared end section line to Margate Terrace Storm Sewer, south side of road from 320 property line Node174 13.1 1 11 7 5 El El F El Li ❑ ❑ ❑ 0.430 -0,920 -1.790 1.280 1.49D 0.410 O,DDD 0. 00D 0.000 D.OD0 0.000 0,0D0 104.2DD 98.900 0.0DD 0.000 0.000 Headi I Max 664.322 667.846 669,436 669,331 668.848 665.893 Nodes Input Runoff Nodes A n V Existing Conditions: 10-year Critical Duration, Entire Trunk Line (10-year, 2 Hr) Fi{e Vim, tiA tndow Margate Existing_xPSWMM2018.xp Dynamk Long Section 0)0 0 0 0 � I � � � I w k � � nxr Q � �� j� I �- �v. «P Base Scenario, _ ` _ Active Sub, catch ments Close Untitk-I Day 1,31 Time 0100:00 Step 0 n--ra -H R-Its Link MTFES LinkMTE2 LinkMTEI West36in East24in2 ,Aest42in1 East24in1 West 42in East24in Ndrth24in1 South North'24in South 0.500 0,330 0.160 0.180 0.280 0.160 0.260 -0.070 o,210 1.130 1.550 2.580 2.850 0.014 0.013 0.013 0,01.3 0.013 0013 0.013 0.013 0,013 O.fl13 0.013 0.013 0013 2340 3.700 6.370 28.220 11.88{l 40.520 11.540 27AW 10,320 24.030 125.210 36,330 169,750 Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Headi I Max Fd -4.408 6.802 14.197 17.816 6.535 79.002 17,813 80.907 -0.958 28:277 84.021 36.85 870.0 �.0 fs.�.�.Q Colston -Link WWI iron 1 to 11 iw pi Litrlc rioln it to 7 8.w 3W:G #3 - Intersection of #1- Margate Margate Terrace Terrace Yard and Westcliff Flared End ; .f I..-- _.--- -- 1 #2 - Connection point of flared end section line to Margate Terrace Storm Sewer, south side of road from 320 property line 5 .5 5t4.5 1219.9 #4 - Intersection #5 - Intersection of of Margate Oxford and Terrace and Westgate ; T-__--__-_.______________`___ 10-year, 2 Hr Water Surface Elevation i�6ultipl=-link from 7 to 5 - fkultoe Link from s to 2 Ike- - Lhk from 2 to 8 1524.5�-_ ._ tSZ9.8 zrs4.is Intersection of Oxford and Warwic ; -------------------- .. -- �- n 9 80.575 v ifultiple Urk from E to 0utfa➢. 2744.8 3049.7 Node174 13.1 1 11 7 5 2 6 Outfall Frerb 0.430 -0.920 -1.790 1.280 1.490 0.410 4.540 3,920 3,830 0.000 0.0D0 0.000 O.ODO 0.400 O.ODO 0.OD0 O.ODD 0.000 O.ODO 104,200 99.100 0.000 O.ODO O.ODO O.ODO O.ODO UDD Headi 664.322 667 436 669,331 668.848 665,893 662.635 654.848 646.168 n g 0,422 1.424 1.910> 0.874 1 0.463 1 -0.713 3,915 1.165 0051 I Variab 13.O R 13.0D0 12493.540 29824.920 - 13.0D0 13.000 13.000 D0 13.000 13.OD0 Ponding Existing Conditions: 50-year Critical Duration, Entire Trunk Line XPY!IMtTr27f19.1 - Dynamic Long Section File View ," indow Margate -Existing XPSWMM2018.xp Dynamic Long Section x I I j I t) k I it Q V E{ � Base Scenario Active Subcatcfiments Close s r a' �J rare i„-r, __ Untitk_.i Day 101 Tm►e a9,00.00 step 0 n-'+> -4 Q..'Af. Link MTFES LinkNUE2 Li VIVITE1 West36in East24in2 West42in1 East24in1 a'est42 n East24in North24irt1 bouth42in1 Narth24in South42inO � 2.340 3.700 6.370 28.220 11.880 40.520 11.540 27.460 10.320 24.030 125.210 36.330 169.750 Rem Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Headi mmv R -4.464 7:692 16.728 21.602 7.938 85.936 19.746 85.918 21.000 28.367 98.340 36.906 97.343 Headi nq 664.324 667.934 669.053 670.541 1 670,541 1 669.841 669,941 666.300 666,300 662.928 662.928 655,102 655.102 I Maxi 667,934 60.053 6710.541 669.941 669.841 666.300 j 666.300 663.233 662.928 655,102 655.317 646.521 646.370 J Cor&ua link MTHI Ifom I to 15 IM. tg)% Ufr& Min Rh. to Y 1 Node174 13.1 1 11 7 5 2 6 OutFall Freeb 0.430 -1.000 -2.400 0.070 0.500 0.000 4.240 3.670 3.630 O.ODO 0.000 0.000 0.000 O.ODO O.ODO O.ODD 0.000 O.00D O.ODO 136.ODO 132.0DO O.ODO O.ODO 32.800 0.000 0.000 O.ODO Headi mmr 664.324 667.934 659,053 670.541 669.841 666.300 662,928 655.102 1546.370 ng 0.419 -1.524 2.60 -0.654 -0.466 -1.257 3.610 0.794 -0.424 Va ri a b l 13.000 13 .010 13.ODO 13.ODO 13.000 13.ODO 13.ODO 13.000 j Nodes Input Runoff Nodes Ponding I P19.7 h u APPENDIX B Proposed Alternatives - - - - - - - — - _ -- -- 1 W-M -,W 03 m f 7 N. �- a Igo � � .., 0 3 — CDC. �� ;1 i Q Q ; 'Warrington Rd � -o rn n o I -ni CD o r m a �N - - . ^, y r 0 ,! > 4 W A _ 0 C a n N o � T .. ' p- s F- N N N N l Knollwood Ftd�- -y � 0 N _ _ 0 _- Ir 0 i CID SN DD TI !r 00 0 Cis D � O z Kenton Rd�. q> -4. -�,- — [� -I?D i r �� 0 - �j -AIN! > i d Kipling-PI 0' N = ucc CO (r } f W f 14, . o W a N ca — 41 Vi.f - - A•r Q N N N N lni'�Oxforii Rd CL © ' 1 Oo i CO go 0 Westcliff.Ln n N rt Hamilton:LnCi1 Rco .m g 6J7N t� yCD td a4sr}ae�� �•CDs j a N � CD � N�WQ CD - ^' Beverly PI _0 0 G rh V J y - A\ m (n _ ti1eadowbrook Ln N i O CD Osv 0 � U) � N) T C ? ! r �- s * u- a6p!2i,ua D `� CD m or rr , s z Vl CD C O Z i p ic i CQ rt (D CD v(D ICD v e_f to O C Nm; x &A r r� � G r -Warrington Rd 0 ° 0 T0O ;4 0 N N U2 `JJIj Kenton Rd 7. 03 N 0 I C a,. � N h7 0� to - C1 FPO 0 en f° 3 0 = �. no G(D CD � CL ML Nv jo a(D— (D N C�o (POOLO0) ZO CD CD O 'ILO� f OO° od-Rd 1w D - O O 0 4WV A N� N� 1-4 ' 00 • �— �J�Q 0 Westcliff Ln-,�. _ L� w �s N N �y Be�eI A x . _ 0 — N N N t!1 9eadowbrook Ln O 0--)o—Oxforcl Rcl I Id alslla� .�O- i 0 I %) Q CD (f) U CD 0 M emu, ua D (DL Option #5 - Divert downstream areas and add separate 36" line on Warwick (10-year, 2 Hr) File view AvindoW Margate Existing_XPSWMM2a18,xp Dynarnnc Long Section o-Li 5 [�� 5 -Se arate Line.on Active Subcatchments, clime LhibtLed Urt) w Day fol n_.&a and Ra Ifs Scenario Link MT FES 5 - Se rate Line on Warwick Link MTE2 5-'Se arate Line on Wanuick Link MTE1 5 Separate Line on Warwick Wast35n 5.- Se arate Line on Warwick EastT4 i n'2 _ 5 - Separate Line on Warwick West42inl 5 - Separate Line on Warwick EastNinl 5 - Separate Line on Warwick 2.340 3,700 5.370 28.22-0 11.880 40.520 11,540 Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Headi MaxFI1 --4.407 6,801' - 14.192 668,433 1 17.810 6.543 79.046 17,822 Headi 654.322 667.945 669.324 669.324 658,841 668,841 670.0 Moo om¢uit limit wit €ram 13.1 to 1 Cotuutrt tick UTEi Pt 1 to 11 iAudtvp lirdc €riam 11 to 7 Mi t le Liar -Rom 7 to 5 fl.tt 13 .E 3T7,t 56&.7 7542 942.5 1131-3 1319.9 1bM.4 I 10-year, 2 Hr Water Surface Elevation #4 -Intersection #3 - Intersection of of Margate #5 - Intersection of #1- Margate Existing Ground Oxford and g Margate Terrace Terrace and g Westgate Terrace Yard and Westcliff Oxford Flared End - - - ------ --- ---- - -- - --------- ----- • --- ---- - f - - - -- - #2 - Connection point of flared end section line to Margate Terrace Storm Sewer, south side of road from 320 property line Q92,A 661.7 ' Node174 13.1 Scenario 5 - Separate Line on Warwick 5 - Se arate Line on Warwi ad El - 0,430 -0,920 rfind 0.000 0.0DD 0.000 104.000 Headi 664.322 667,345 Nodes Input: ',RiinofFNodes 1 11 7 5 - Se • arate Line on Warwick 5 - Separate Line on Warwick 5 - Separate Line on Wa ' i ❑ I ❑ -1.780 119D 1.500 0.000 0.0DD - - 0.0D0 98.9DD 0.0D0 0.OD0 668.433 669.322 668.840 Ponding n V la&5 5 A 5 - Separate Line on Warwick _ ❑ 0.420 0.000 0.000 565.M w Option #6 - Construct 36" Storm Sewer on Margate Terrace from Oxford Road to the Chicago River (10-year, 2 Hr) r - I File View Window M�ar�glate_�E}}x►�fstiing_XP54VMM2018 Testxp I DYnwnk Lung S CWR x V V 0 © 0 ®I ©1 n t`y IMP Base Scenario Active Su6catchments CIOSC unmet T- 00:03.,W Stsp 0 Link MTFES Lmtc.kllFZ - ---� Link MTE1 West 3fiin East 24in2 West 42in1 East24in1 2.340 3.700 6370. 28.220 11.8W 40.520 _ _ Free 11.540 Free Flee _ Free Free Free I Free Headi -3.816 3.8W 10.630 -14A61 -8384 _ 57.729 14.639 Headi nq NAUL666.991 664.194 666.991 666.688 665.375, 665,375 665.946 665.946- _ 666.688 665.375 665,946 665,946- 664.198 664.198 �-w•n i rca ��ui� � w ea. i un mica �.+ w � �r,e e.o i ass.c - 1S9;6,679.2 •'5b5.7 7512 #4 - Intersection of Margate #3 - Intersection of Terrace and #1- Margate Margate Terrace Oxford Terrace Yard and Westcliff Flared End 670.0 8M.0 i #2 - Connection point of flared end section line to Margate Terrace Storm Sewer, south side of road from 320 property line #5 - Intersection of Oxford and Westgate 1508.4 - I Existing Ground I n Y t8a5.5 Node174 13.1 J 1 11 1 7 5 ❑ El ❑ ❑ 5.230 4-390 OA00 0.000 2.100 0.460 0.000 -0.050 0.00D -0,040 0.000 _ _ O.00D 0.000 _ 23.ODD 15.100 0.ODD O.ODO 0•000 Headi ng 664.294 666.991 666.698 665.375 _ 665.946 3.082 _ 664.198 0,451 _ -OA48 -0A70 - 4A64 _1.537 Nodes kaput Runoff Nodes CONCEPTUAL ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST MARGATE TERRACE DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION DEERFIELD, ILLINOIS VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD GHA PROJECT #4382.065 Prepared by: James Houston Date: January 9, 2019 Checked by: Jodi McCarthy Date: January 10, 2019 OPTION #2 - DIVERT FLOW FROM WARRINGTON RD. 42" SEPARATE LINE Pay Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Value 1 Pavement Reconstruct R/R 1,300 SQYD $100.00 $130,000.00 2 Storm Sewer Removal FT $25.00 3 Trench Backfill 1,600 CY $35.00 $56,000.00 4 Storm Sewers, 36" RCP FT $150.00 5 Storm Sewers, 42" RCP 1,700 FT $160.00 $272,000.00 6 Storm Sewers, 48" RCP FT $170.00 7 Catch Basin, Various Types 15 EA $7,000.00 $105,000.00 8 Water Service Adjustment 20 EA $2,500.00 $50,000.00 9 Sanitary Service Adjustment 20 EA $2,500.00 $50,000.00 10 Mobilization (3%) 1 LSUM $21,000.00 $21,000.00 11 Traffic Control & Protection, (Special) (5%) 1 LSUM $35,000.00 $35,000.00 12 Soil Remediation 1 LSUM $100,000.00 $100,000.00 13 Dewatering 1 LSUM $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Construction: $849,000.00 Contingency (25%): $212,250.00 Construction Cost Subtotal: $1,061,250.00 Engineering (10%) $106,125.00 Total: $1,167,375.00 Detailed Description: Dption #2 includes diverting flow from Warrington Rd by constructing 1,700 feet of 42" RCP separate run to convey Warrington Rd and Westgate flow to outlet. The Davement removal and replacement is based on the maximum width of disturbed pavement area. Trench backfill was calculated using the max pay widths and allowable lepth for the proposed storm sewer assuming 3 feet of cover. Catch Basins were determined by the existing layout of structures. This estimate does not account for the -ost of possible land aquisition, easement, permits, utility relocation, or other factors. A contingency of 25%was used. *Since Gewalt-Hamilton Associates Inc. Has No Control Over the Cost of Labor, Materials, or Equipment, or Over the Contractor's Methods of Determining Prices, or Over Competitive Bidding of Market Conditions, Opinions of Probable Costs, as Provided for Herein, Are to be Made on the Basis of Experience and Qualifications and Represent the Best Judgement as a Design Professional Familiar with the Construction Industry. Gewalt-Hamilton Associates, Inc., Cannot and Does Not Guarantee That Proposals, Bids, or The Construction Costs Will Not Vary From Opinions of Probable Cost Prepared for the Owner. 4382.065 Conceptual EOPC.xlsx 1/18/2019 8:34 AM P1 CONCEPTUAL ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST MARGATE TERRACE DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION DEERFIELD, ILLINOIS VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD GHA PROJECT #4382.065 Prepared by: James Houston Date: January 9, 2019 Checked by: Jodi McCarthy Date: January 10, 2019 OPTION #4 - UPSIZE TO DOUBLE 48" RCP Pay Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Value 1 Pavement Reconstruct R/R 4,300 SQYD $100.00 $430,000.00 2 Storm Sewer Removal 4,800 FT $25.00 $120,000.00 3 Trench Backfill 5,300 CY $35.00 $185,500.00 4 Storm Sewers, 36" RCP FT $150.00 5 Storm Sewers, 42" RCP FT $160.00 6 Storm Sewers, 48" RCP 4,800 FT $170.00 $816,000.00 7 Catch Basin, Various Types 20 EA $7,000.00 $140,000.00 8 Water Service Adjustment 30 EA $2,500.00 $75,000.00 9 Sanitary Service Adjustment 30 EA $2,500.00 $75,000.00 10 Mobilization (3%) 1 LSUM $56,000.00 $56,000.00 11 Traffic Control & Protection, (Special) (5%) 1 LSUM $94,000.00 $94,000.00 12 Soil Remediation 1 LSUM $100,000.00 $100,000.00 13 Dewatering 1 LSUM $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Construction Contingency (25%) $2,121,500.00 $530,375.00 Construction Cost Subtotal: $2,651,875.00 Engineering (10%) $265,187.50 Total: $2,917,062.50 Detailed Description: Option #4 includes the elimination of both the 36" and 24" pipes along Warrington Rd and Warwick Rd and installing 2,400 feet of double 48" RCP pipe. The pavement removal and replacement is based on the maximum width of disturbed pavement area. Trench backfill was calculated using the max pay widths and allowable depth for the proposed storm sewer assuming 3 feet of cover. Catch Basins were determined by the existing layout of structures. This estimate does not account for the cost of possible land aquisition, easement, permits, utility relocation, or other factors. A contingency of 25% was used. *Since Gewalt-Hamilton Associates Inc. Has No Control Over the Cost of Labor, Materials, or Equipment, or Over the Contractor's Methods of Determining Prices, or Over Competitive Bidding of Market Conditions, Opinions of Probable Costs, as Provided for Herein, Are to be Made on the Basis of Experience and Qualifications and Represent the Best Judgement as a Design Professional Familiar with the Construction Industry. Gewalt-Hamilton Associates, Inc., Cannot and Does Not Guarantee That Proposals, Bids, or The Construction Costs Will Not Vary From Opinions of Probable Cost Prepared for the Owner. 4382.065 Conceptual EOPC.xlsx 1/18/2019 8:34 AM P2 CONCEPTUAL ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST MARGATE TERRACE DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION DEERFIELD, ILLINOIS VILLAGE OF DEERFIELD GHA PROJECT#4382.065 Prepared by: James Houston Date: January 9, 2019 Checked by: Jodi McCarthy Date: January 10, 2019 OPTION #6 - 36" RCP TO DISCHARGE THE BACKFLOW FROM OXFORD TO MIDDLE FORK Pay Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Value 1 Pavement Reconstruct R/R 2,000 SQYD $100.00 $200,000.00 2 Storm Sewer Removal FT $25.00 3 Trench Backfill 2,300 CY $35.00 $80,500.00 4 Storm Sewers, 36" RCP 2,500 FT $150.00 $375,000.00 5 Storm Sewers, 42" RCP FT $160.00 6 Storm Sewers, 48" RCP FT $170.00 7 Catch Basin, Various Types 10 EA $7,000.00 $70,000.00 8 Water Service Adjustment 10 EA $2,500.00 $25,000.00 9 Sanitary Service Adjustment 10 EA $2,500.00 $25,000.00 10 Mobilization (3%) 1 LSUM $24,000.00 $24,000.00 11 Traffic Control & Protection, (Special) (5%) 1 LSUM $40,000.00 $40,000.00 12 Soil Remediation 1 LSUM $100,000.00 $100,000.00 13 Dewatering 1 LSUM $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Construction: $969,500.00 Contingency (25%): $242,375.00 Construction Cost Subtotal: $1,211,875.00 Engineering (10%) $121,187.50 Total: $1,333,062.50 Detailed Description: Option #6 includes constructing 2,500 feet of 36" RCP storm sewer to discharge the back flow from the Oxford Road system to the Middle Fork. The pavement removal and replacement is based on the maximum width of disturbed pavement area. Trench backfill was calculated using the max pay widths and allowable depth for the proposed storm sewer assuming 3 feet of cover. Catch Basins were determined by the existing layout of structures. This estimate does not account for the cost of possible land aquisition, easement, permits, utility relocation, or other factors. A contingency of 25% was used. *Since Gewalt-Hamilton Associates Inc. Has No Control Over the Cost of Labor, Materials, or Equipment, or Over the Contractor's Methods of Determining Prices, or Over Competitive Bidding of Market Conditions, Opinions of Probable Costs, as Provided for Herein, Are to be Made on the Basis of Experience and Qualifications and Represent the Best Judgement as a Design Professional Familiar with the Construction Industry. Gewalt-Hamilton Associates, Inc., Cannot and Does Not Guarantee That Proposals, Bids, or The Construction Costs Will Not Vary From Opinions of Probable Cost Prepared for the Owner. 4382.065 Conceptual EOPC.xlsx 1/18/2019 8:34 AM P3 Olt 0 P ti V) C4- 90 c lzk� INC* >~ilea� ' 1 P'l�irzners � , g a 1I-9 �S�*7. /634-068 7 r3: r J. Ct7IlfII].�'i1t1�S:, , .. FAX TPANSMITTAL A o} pdpe9 1 Dept. phone # (z)s•;,:$OOU_ ex dx.# . (647) 94&U62 .: '.you dg >aot rive �� ptges.of 9tis 'anomissioa, please coIItaU us zt 8A:M4.3S2 . 'fhfx t iwftc f intmdad only .for the use of dke indtvidval .or Kati to 'wh5cb it is addrot.,cd. W may =Zgik SafDif zim &a is Txi-mlcnc, c=fia fdal.:ma mont+tjhm d1sC7nam TAf-31 'DrirrdrM. - . Mon M NU I.U:ZMm-. I V-11 l.AK5 COUNTY LAND SURVEY COMPANY LAND $URVF_YORS CIVIL ENGINEERS gu1TH 2.1 010 WEST 91,rRw000 DFAM L,4Kr. wLUI'r. ILL1NM1 , ik%0 A LWI—zs4-00oI� 847-295•C11734 (FAXI Orren i akell Suite W-2785 2201 WaukWn Road i',annotick�tlrn, 1ililtois, bUf1i5 Attention! Mr. Hart J. Kempff, General Couracl Ire: Order No..16171 Oefitttst em Wo write to you is resiioase to your requesa.ot'.t►s ttlade after Deerfield Villige Hall and 'added t 1-oday with the phone.vall to u concealing 371 k4msay, Road in D"rkleld. You finally stiroo4+ari ow � poelblo the vliiage orDeecfleid's fax to you ofNUvotnber 7,1002.. . . En resgohse tt, raid tax wc.1A1mwer Mr. Case':+ questions and opt to then, in his numeriaat order: . NowrnOcr 8, 2002 yesterday's mbAirig at into from Manuel -He' nandez o g1,�cver' tis ccvs>r�p9eteiy as vs fvllc►wn, rdFL-Mi Jg (1) Referring oilly to the otfrrrd properly we art oonlpleteb convinced that the three, drawing which vie havC produced, being Cfile Nos. 16 •- 8 — 363, 16 -- 8 — M13, and 16 W- 8 -- 444 continue to portaay kha Cori ours wbieh exisw just prior to the mmertt detnalition of lhO htruse that exisat 373 t zomy Rend. All three drawings depict the same contours and those arO tiro centaurs that misted is 1985. Those eantouri ore 00, ntoitrs titpt show.. Olt our sits e4nl�:tirig pin last revised August 29. 2002, Insofar as csff'tiie site of tile, Gllfwl propcjs y wo have not had the tom nor do we think it should be your responsibility or astir rO"Mihility tf'' determine if ttto contours on tht. afbrententionxa J three drawings Still_plorUirl.. `1"hwe. contours slid, however, indicate good off site drainage. f (2} We leave detormined to the best of our abil' hat the pmviously existing 3trltctum on the subject propeM created 4,81 square fed of iarlpW ious area. calculating rails ow 29, 2002, situ -Aa Bering plan we fuid that the proposed impervioLiu striwtores .saver 9,61 square foot on tho subject property. The brleulcdawn is ai; follows: Men Pickall N4E)VOMba 8, 2002 n!dIMISill Ad propmed jind .(I) house Z264 SX 47504 6- f - .(2) drive 1.100 sx. 3,3$i4 s E (3) patior, 1,077 i;,f 1,062 &f. . (4} wa)ICS 275 s f 684,0 O'S' qo'�t 1 311 VS '.W6 WOM111tp that in a 24 hour 25 your storm event totcot rum0firpm thu GlIf wd. property atom was.. 1.21 oubic feet per send {old house) ihd WW now be 1.59 cubic feet per mood (proposed housq). This is approximately a 33 per cent Morem In -runoff` with the now hu,.tum. TI its p;mittaoo of course will drop drainatiemfty -when runoff from otter arm q ttp to (ho peak of the watershed that runs tilrough the (311ford property is o4&d to those amounts givert above. The abrMute increase ill rultciff is vry rltigor, I Y an '(3)' We bejjeV'O it is pfeMtOr4;: -at this L time to CoriSider solutions. to the complaints Oat at this pob -n in t1ro' o appear to be blown Onl6whit out of OuWlon No. 4 is noi.60rc)y understood by us. We T44 oind by refeetiog. tho r4oderto our Rfbterm-qtIqn6d. site enetwring" P19n vrheirexm the finished grade at the aiimjor wall 'of tile house, around rouoh 8Q jw-r 6om of the house, is at 670.00. An lino with the BOCA cod the tap of foundation is G70,50, - Gmntcd; there arc: amml ar6qq..wh the, '70.00 grade it; cxoceded but thdso arc in specialized locations Where patios, Oto., are sligh* rah%4. not nWw94r4Y indicating an itwrc in tile Lop of roundatio.11 grades. PlcW advis6 us when, and if, r1im inforsuation Is fieeded.'from us. CordWly yours, LAKFCOUNTY LAND RVEYCOMPANY w. 7/ JarriiE. Andeman. P-F- J�-.Vbh 8XV4 tJia Wir-Mbef 8, 2002, tc, .1 -847,572-52'99 8 2002 REPORT — REVISION TO RUNOFF CALCI.ULATI B-1. Here is my calculation, using some of the assumptions from the November 8th report, including the original runoff rate estimate. I have no way to verify for deny that calculation at this point. I assume the building and impervious structures are correctly shown. Original House New Construction (1) Property 'Sq Ft (all in sq. ft.) (all in sq. ft.) (2) 126 sq ft x 330 sq ft Ramsey Rd. part of property 41,580 41,580 (from site plan— 8129102) 27.05 sq ft x 330 sq ft 3,408 3,4081 (from site plan- 8129102) (3) Property without Road 38,172 38,172 (3) House 2,264* 4,5041 (4) Drive 1,200* 3,3641 (5) Patios 1,077* 11062* (6) Walks 275* 684 TOTAL EXCLUDING ROAD 4,816 9,614 Runoff (24 hr., 25 year history) = 1.21 cu ft/second* = 9.052 gallons/second *All of these numbers are assumed accurate. Source: Nov. 8 memo from Jim B-2. Runoff in cubic feet and gallons: We excluded the impe included in the property, which makes the property net equal 38, the percentage of the net property covered by impervious area bei (as planned), we obtain the following: Percent Impervious Area: 4, 816=38,172 9,614=38,172 Runoff (cu. ft. per second) Gallons in 3 Hour Rainfall** Gallons According to Anderson Report Original House New Cons 12.617% 25.18 1.21 (per Anderson) 2.415 97,762 gallons 195,1 97,762 gallons 130 ** The Village engineers used an average 3-hour rainfall in their discussions to Oren Pickell. vious area from the road 72 sq. ft. If we calculate )re and after construction see calculation below) 9 gallons gallons me. Calculation of Runoff for New Construction; Taking the runoff in proportion to impervious area, we calculate the new runoff to be: 1.21=.12617x, where x = 9.59. for the old house's rate of flow ratio. 9.59 x .25186 = 2.415 Runoff -- Substituting into the new % of impervious area B-3. CONCLUSION: The runoff from the new construction IS significant. If a Deerfield pool holds about 320,000 gallons of water as estimated by Jeff Wadej of the Park District, the runoff from the new construction is slightly less than half the depth (40%) of that pool, according to Anderson's calculation and more than half the depto (61 %) according to my calculation. In either case, this water RUNOFF volume is NOT minor to me, the 320 Margate, the 960 Meadowbrook properties and the rest of Meadowbrook. Page 9 Maj/personal/drainage/Pickell Engr Rpt Nov 2002 Adjusted Calculation TIONS AND COMMENTS — ANDER; I i RT OF NOVEM • Mr. Welsh thought the water would potentially reach abo Currently the 373 Ramsey drainage water only hits the F properties. I explained this is unacceptably moving a drain to Margate and directly relates to construction. The flow d is diverted into neighboring properties. • According to the Anderson report, there is a 33% increase i of water due to increased impervious area. - The report increase is very minor, in any event". He compared the it flow from that Meadowbrook area. These are inappropria is addressing the additional runoff, not absolute waterfall.. • Increasing the rate and amount of water from a new constrl it usually is, IS a MATERIAL increase in ABSOLUTE volurr PLUS any increase from other properties makes the situati as improperly stated. • In a 3-hour storm, the absolute increase in water volume, calculations are correct, would be about 32,30.0 gallons. Th never came into the neighbor's property prior to const increased impervious area. If a baby pool is 40 ft by 20 deep, this INCREASE is equivalent to 3.5 baby pools of w� • The Anderson report also stated that he had not cor properties in his August 29, 2002 site plan assessment, a the time nor do we think it should be your responsibilit determine if the contours on the aforementioned three pertain." We believe the water dumped onto neighbor yarc TIONS AND COMMENTS — Site Plan Au • All reports have stated that contours and elevations h, property. This is clearly not the case when examining the • The contours prior to the construction are lightly shown c house is drawn in. The new construction is drawn in with t elevations in many areas are 4, 3.5, 3, 2.5, 2 feet above th, • The drain .water PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION would Southeast on a gently sloping decline. o With the new construction, the water will likely flow it hit a 4 foot higher (on the west side of the house), wa As in playing billiards, the water will bounce off and flow as it seeks to level to a natural flow. o With the new construction, the natural flow line is c building probably about 150 feet (our guess), whicl flow into the 330 Margate property instead of thrc Ramsey property. (Mr. Welsh estimated an increa,, into the 330 Margate property yard.) o The increased elevation diverts .the drainage proble property into the neighbors' yards. it half way into our yard. roperty Fine between our ge problem from Ramsey rection, rate and quantity i rate of flow and quantity ,tates, that "the absolute crease with all the water e comments because he Lion site by 33% of what and rate. This increase >I even worse, not minor asuming Mr. Anderson's is 32,300 gallons, which lction and attributed to by an average of 1.5 ft Dr. idered the surrounding 1 that "we have not had or our responsibility to (contour) drawings still should be considered. ve not changed on the iite Plan. n the site plan. The old ie elevations noted. The prior contours. lowly flow Northwest to the same natural course, I, patio, boulder, or other. ivert to a west and south iverted southward of the then forces the water to igh the back of the 373 e entering about halfway from the 373 Ramsey Page 2 Maj/personal/drainage/Pickell Engr Rpt Nov 2002 Adjusted Calculation OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTS —Lawsuit The property in question at 373 Ramsey (Spelius) sued the 323 Ramsey owners (Longton) because of drainage issues over 12 years ago. The 323 Ramsey people installed a ditch and put up a fence between the properties, but drainage issues! have apparently plagued the 373 Ramsey property for many. years. Neighbors like us, do not want their problems moved to our properties. Submitted by: Mary Anne D'Onofrio 330 Margate Terrace Deerfield, IL 60015 Work: 847-948-1118 Cell: 847-217-5995 Email: majackson@myownmeals.com Page 3 Maj/personal/drainage/Pickell Eng'r Rpt Nov 2002 Adjusted Calculation " DT To: Mr. Clint Case Mr. John Welch From: Mary Anne Jackson D'Onofrio Subject: 373 Ramsay Road Drainage Proposal Thank you for taking the time to review the drainage proposal to the Village and to the Granat Family. It has taken much E part to get to this point. We appreciate that the drainage plan includes radin in the bac L_____— . as well as the proposed 153 foot long, 12" concrete pipe to the 1 16, 2003 g made by Orren Pickell and time on everyone's ,card of the 373 vovertv Ma sewers through an easement being negotiated with the Granat Fa ily residents, we are all concerned about the rate of flow and the capacit pipe as the water moves into the Village's 15" storm sewers. Than provide this information once it becomes available from Don Fielding. Mate Terrace storm_ As Margate Terrace of this proposed "12" k you for agreeing to QUESTION. Our question remains, is the 15" storm sewer pipe large enough to handle the proposed increased volume of storm water? If not, will the Village replace the 15" pipe with larger pipes before allowing the proposed drainage system connection to be made? As the Granat's negotiate and consider this proposal, several Margate residents remain concerned that the 15" pipe on Margate will not be of an adequate size or capacity to accommodate the proposed increase in drain water from the 12" proposed pipe. • Even now, during heavy rainstorms, it is the opinion of several Margate families that the storm sewer overflows more often now than it has in past years. • The overflow is at a junction where we understand: o the 15" Margate pipe o meets the 21" Margate pipe and o meets the Westcliff drainage pipe in front of 342 Margate (Moss's). • The water crests over the curb in front of the Moss's, up oveer the top of our driveway (higher than the curb) and flows across our front .yard into the Granat's backyard, where the Pickell intake drain is proposed. Speaking specifically for our family, our concern is that if the 15" Village storm sewer pipe is not large enough, that this additional 12" pipe full of storm water.will cause the 15" Village storm sewer to overflow, potentially flooding our house during rainstorms. • We have a lot of years of history with regard to storm water since we bought the house in 1977 4Never once, even in the worst of storms, has water come into our home. (We have a crawl space, so there is no basement to flood.) ,• In the 1985 huge flood, I stood on our front porch with my new infant and watched the water flow. We had lots of water flowin�c th^ rough our front yard but it never came into the house. In the big storm of October 2001, all of the Margate residents were out on the street trying to clean out that junction and put up sandbags to keep the water in the street. We look forward to your evaluation and determination of the adequacy of the 15" Margate pipe. Page 1 Meeting0416.dgc r r; I it 1 � �+. � � ,'• ''►+ t �".��'',��;' ��`� n�,'Fr �,�••' •Sa r; `��f ram' ;{ ' rF Lai 0 H of �-, �4 4-4 P: a) 4 • 0 C [) IC o 0jw P4 a) (L 4-)0 M W 0 rd H -,i ro ni 63 rl �4 0 �4 xt, 5-1 P4 04 4-) A4 a) Q 4-4 13� 0 hP �0 - 01 j- g Cl ch N - _ CL Warrington Rd p om p N 3 en T` o G w,; f s o 0 ° - e Knollwond Rd ■ - 7 T 3 t kl d O. c co Lf1 co'--- -n po (D p ' CD O x � entoriRd7 .KiplingPIbb r E p—b s W x;N W o N � � Wky CD �Q _ ; a # N N Oxford Rd - _ Q P A ? 0 T �`� t71K� 0 O 0 1 ❑ (D —�-,Westcliff Ln �--p-� zi �_ cc �� m H_ amilton Ln =1�po p M++ C m P N A Id?ISliaeo <D a jj 0)a, O t C N - F- °' w N Beverly Pf �'—- -i —� D ���— p p p p P - m �N. I 0 > 4eadowbrook Ln Q 0 � r N O C' 0 (D CD � E n. m x Cl)(n N O i. 0 ^ �. rn :� cow � - � CD b co v� u� a6pRi_ua D CD S m SB CD 0 =r CD C) z KiplingP 11 CD CD.Q 2), �.COD (D I SP. (D (D m (D (D -33 Q (D CD C) (D Q 0 .0 Marrin-6ton Rd 6- 0 60 Kenton Rd 7W 0 at OA nI lid 0 WO -3 X CL 0 - 4 ,�4fll • 0 C) 0 0 �— Ikn--Illl-lsid RI, . '�w 0 --- >— Ox,fo rd - Rd -4 0 00 a) 0 44� Mf-1 i�$q 0 0 Westcliff Ln D3 I- Harniltonln C) A6 0 0 0 —0 00 Beverly J�l 0 0 0 CD ;L 0 PAeadowbrookLn CD rs" -n CL S. < - U) CD 0 C4 -h q 0 -1 0 — h CD cf) cn co CD 0 CL r-: U) a5pi,8,L'a CD > CD CD r maw m v► a •o CD a o rn 7 n 1! If � N cu cn (�D O z 'Kipling PI I C ro CL m N Il G Q �ro �+ Cn C ro y� 0 - m i[ n `° 0 0- m D— m x S m * q;Zn to ,. 3 0 ' Warrington Rd 'r Q o a sv J 00 nnton Rd s " 4b, i N � N i s a N NnolizTo Rd go r j men c'>` s I � --�-- -- - - - -a• �qn.. --�--- -� - �r p � i ysl ii A,.tii w?c N ~ W v 714 KtJ7 _ w ol Iy, a, 0 way ��a o t; CD i� � a o� Ni n. I►s � 0. Beverly Pl ce 3 CD N N, O. 0 M 0�0 (Dv� n 0 =r _ a Hamilton' Ln r AA. p T, 'i a 1 (CD � N „-1 a6Plldua D U CD CD 0 V D q O 3. �• p C I Warrington Rd - ° - --- —F— 0 0 0 r C. d a f O N y r. New 9 Z� 0 w � 0 0 L1�s s P � ••= N � N co 4 m ► ;� 'ao 00 O Z Kenton Rd 'Ki 1 0). � Q pling PI 01 V, s m �O � J O �•ju �N Knflflwood Rd CC N a P C CD Q -O o CL<�m 3 CD a CA � G rt w� 1 y�Ul aa " 7 Oxford Rd - s C. s p7 n H_ amilton_Ln CA n' + 0 >v -.0 1 1 0 x Cn C/ v (D O 3 cQ u-1 a6p1b ua D U) (D CD n� 0 m cwa CD o Z 0, y Atf m o N CD CD / v/im� � �• C--o \V 6 �.CD d CD/� > 3 1 \V `i Z..I C pa (OH 3 N 91) rr 5 O � r N) a C JI x rF i V NSW. WZP si 0 �. Cif cr oo cc � ---� cn w _ W ca to ��IXv7 co m s -I n �� -- 0, ;co n 0.. a CD tQ D TJ 7 3 D � (D N (D I I A y Hod saPON, bwu% InGA saPOM I 66E'S99 996'P99 07E'899 O6Z'S99 $EZ'899 S€E'M !PedH 000"0 000'0 000'0 00 ['6L OWDL o00'0 000'0 000'0 000'0 0 ONG 006.0 OLEZ 06Z'Z ❑ OG9' L- 0 L£' L- 4Zb'0 ❑ ❑ Li ❑ 9E al1W aseanul - L 9f al lyq aseanul - L 9E of IVY aseanul - L 9E of 1W aseanul - L 9E ol1W aseanul - L 9E <111W asean - L oueaa�5 SI L l l lI VE L VL LaP4N — JaMas uJJols O'LR3i b'$M 5'S3E: E' 1Ei k 3'ZK aull AliadoJd OZE wojj peoJ }o apls glnos 'JaMaS WJols a:)eJJa-L aleSJevy of aull uolhas pua paJel} jo lulod uoll:)auuoD - Z# JaMas wiol.s O,oL9 Pu3 PaJeIJ IppIsaM pue pJeA a:)eJJal pJobXO a0eJJal aleSJe" aleSJevq L# pue a3eJJal }o uolloas.lalul - E# ale2ieW }o uolloasJalul - t# 9 Z'L LSroa".r' t'LLE 1 m E 3 mail Man �jslifw 1 d m 1 umi7 1,41 iW ]{un 1f1 EUO:1 1 of FiU ufol; -7-4—m 3Iltl-1 ]fnpuoo aJnl:)nJls anoge Sulpuod sl 1! sueai.0 (-) anlleO@N aull apeJg :)IIneJPAH ------------------ �i"C29 996L99 99CL99 OZFM OZE'899 - - 06Z'899 8€Z'899 SEET99 trLE' EL- SOT- qT 1peaH LLS'9 L ESZ'EL ZSS'S £ Lb'SZ SLS VZ !P-H aaJj aaJj 09 L'SE MT aaJj aaJj aaij aaJj aaij OZZ'liZ OES'9Z TMT 0tr5' L [ OZS'Otr OS8' L L 9E of IN aseaJ:)ul - L 9f a} lVq aseanul - L 9E of ivi aseanul - L 9E a41W aseanul - 9E of _LV`J aseanul 77 9E of JA asinnul - L 9f ol1VV aseaJ l - L alJeua7S LUTZ459 Lu!Z# aM Zu!bZ e u!9f 7�M Pl, �l�!.l MN �Ig?l S3j 1Vd.�lu!l 101 fgQ P*:!lun FWun q. a« aso10 sluawyple�gn5aAipV 9f olilN aseanul - �dlI� _ ,moljlJeq e sl aAllel�aN — JaMaS wJols ul mol3 lemov s$H5,3d PUL WWU - I i I0 f000 ( o ix uo_t}� Buoi xwvuAa ! dx'SLoZWWMSd) 6 JaMas wiols MopulAl jo Alloede:) algelleny • - e (JH Z'JeaA-OT) „9E olJannaS aJeJJal ajeSJew azisdn :T## uol;dp h 4 T mt h V saPON JYX% T; ul -PON I i i - ---- --- u01lena 3 a3e Jn pu3 paJelj I 1 S pJo1x0 ll!ljlsaM pue pJeA a3eJJa-L aleSlsaAA a3eJJa pue L JaleM JH Z 'JeaA-01 punoJg;�ullslx3 p 1 a�eJJalale;�JelN a}egJew-T# pue pJo}x0 ale2JeAjo 10 uolloasJalul - E# 10 uolhasJalul - S# u011jasJalul - tr# i i 10 L69t V 3ltfrs s}ts 9 ai L q}mt43}+a I W141101 E }L4D 3 4➢3 4 YYL e • r�� - -�- 1 C% :4 Imi'I"I a0wriN SZ o3 t Uxul 931A 31 n 1HTPWD s of vs wool -,-um v41 IMPU00 f}YR�'aJ� O'CL3 tr{}£'£99 tr0£'E99 6trd'tr99 6WO99 L£Z'999 S6C%9 L trZU' LE E4£' l L Ltr8'trZ 9 Ltr' l l SM17 6179'E- !P2aH aaJ3 — - - Otr£'Z aaJj aaJj aaJj aaJj aaJj aatj 065'l l OZS'0tr 488' l L 0ZZ 8Z OLE.9 OOL'£ MOlj UO UUJ2M).JaAQ-Z- MOlj uO UIJJeMjJaAJ❑-Z moH uolbuui eM vaAlp-Z: Molj_uo} uIJJeM:p@Aj(j-Z Mvlj uo}r-uuJeMlJaA1u-Z MOIj UO uuJeM:PaAl(]--Z MOij uOl U1JJeM}PaAIQ-Z 0I12ua:)s lu!trZ:P23 Lu!Ztr:paM Zu!17ZIs23 u!9E ISam MA lull ULH slur S3J iMu!l gnsalj pue ewCl I (0) f-a PaRlun. Petulull SOI3 s;umpp;�]�b gn5gAl' Jol6uuJeM}ianip(3d! -Z yy 11 �,-'.# I 'J L'7 L! �Rl. aI . V x uoq>aS buo3 stxueUAG dx'SLoZy V4A&Sd) 6ulls!x3 ale6JeVi aopuinr. vats. alij 0 - - - - . . 1 OH Z `JeaA-01) uoISulJJeM WOJJ MOIJ )Janla — Z# uolldp A v —---------------------- ---------------- ---- aull Aliadoad OZE woa; peof }o apls glnos 'aaMas ufaols aaeaaal ale2jeA of aull uolljas pua paael} }o lulod uollDauuo:) - Z# ale2lsaM pfo}x0 3}llDlsaM pue pue pao;xp EEEE� pue aoeffal aDeffal ale2feW ale;�jew }o }o uoll:)asfalul - £# ;o uolljasialul - S# uolpasfalul - b# o , uollenal3 aDe;ans aaleM fH Z 'feaA-OT ra88� tk't56 i VIM S W L uiar€.V.1 atdwn E&IL . aa�j aa�j Ob5' 1 l ON017 ^Aol3. anag }�a�uO - E Alol j 3aAaq }Paeu{ v Lu!tr-CIS23 L !Ztrl-SaM asolo sluawy�le�gn5 au}�y 11 `-----_- pua paJeh pfeA a3efaal aleSjeVM T# L of U IUWJ 3VA-1 B107ft a al s —!f oln xb!,l lyla : 03 3ii —f -7 1 xi't3 ]MfU3 WE*599 LGE699 OEE'899 9LL'L99 _ - _ Oar"erg: O8L'S lib8'9l L6trZl OLL'tr- bE6'f- - — aafj aaij aafj aafj aa�j M' L L OZZ'8Z OLE'9 OOL' E OtrE'Z ^'Dlj jfaAaq }PaA! Alol j nllaA3G-}PaAj -'E Alaid I jJana8 }paruU - E nnoL3 lanai }paA!a - E OU Ja,9q }Pan!( - Zu!trZ :Pe3 q19E l�M OI EN' U!l ZRIN Iu!-1 53j JJAJ IIJ.rl 101 A?a r2rwun a;eQQ 4'oLg stfrrsou pue. EWC1 La dJana aiu --o, �- -'o F Ix uoqaas 6uol:gweuAa dx'SLOZv4wmsd)( 6urlsrx3 ale6je44 1 .• PH Z'aeaA-OT) Al.rana8 ufoa} MOII:aaAia — £# uolldp A V n v sapoN punu jncM 89PoN 068'S94 €V8 899 SZ€'b99 LZ$ $99 fo4'$99 OSEE99 !PeaH OOTO -ONO OLtr 4 OOO'O OOO'o ON66 00V'60L Op0 o � OOO'Q 000 L Ow o f - OGOQ ORL L- OLQ' L- 1 OOS L 06Z' L ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 spied + nap.�anlq EE sp�eh + nap �anaq-eE sp�ek +nap:Panap-eE spiek +na•g ]�an?q-e€ spJe,� + naa }Ja,v_q-eE 3PJeA + na8 Vanlq-eE olieua�s S L L L L l'EL trUaPaN -------- ----- -- 1 ter- ---- awl R:padoid OZE t.uoa} peoi;o apls 41nos'aaMas wao;S a:)ejja1 aleojelnl of aull u0113as pua paael; ;o julod uoll:)auuoD - Z# - - I ------- ----- - 0"M9 7 I pua pajelj paO;xo 11!I01s@m pue pie k a:eaaal aleolsaM una �ulIslx pue pro;xp p 9 3 o pue a)eaaal aoeaaal ale5aelN a;e2aeW - T# a}eRjeW;o ;o uolpasialul - E# ;o u01133saaIul - S# uol;:)asjalul b# uoi4ena13 a3e;anS Ja}eM aH Z `ae@A-OI 1 b'SCY: 5'S3ES E'tt'il 8'�66 TOSS 1' ! LLE ?'ifS ©'o c 01 a •sa waa 7-41 w xw i t,�lc s tr68'849 trV8'899 9z£'699 9ZE'699 LZtr'899 65L'LL LEVVL EO4899N,0O0'O !PeaH 418'LL L9611L 06679 O€TL T77gvqlPeaH — aarj aa�j aa�j aaij aaJj aaij m t L OZS'Qtr M, L L OZZ'8Z OLF9 OOL'€ ood'0 spJe +nap }Mnlq-eE �� Z l SPJEA n LuaZtr 3 PJ sp�e+nab}� ZultrZ Ise3 , u!9E' aM a L31N �lurf �l Z31W .�lu!l s3j 1W )lu?n o oeuaDS asol:) - s}uawtp;e:)gnS"anipy . Fal AVo ¢4�It1e4j� i-zt�u�+fl sP;eh+nagVani e dd1 .�, > uoq-S6uaI39—Aa ( dx'BLoMWAAsii 6ui}slx3 a}e61eyy hi0p111/i,.', '»3t i4 ajl� (aH Z `ae@A-OT) S33 paeA aeaa aoe.laal ale9.leA aleulw'13 pue AIJanag WOJJ nnolj :Panld — e£# uoildp n v LVS'Z99 €E9E99 89S'tr99 2tr€'94�J M'999 L8'L m !PeaH 000'o owo 000'0 o00'0 owo owo 000`0 000'0 owo 000'o 000'4 owo. 09CE 0ls'9 OW9 OL€'o owo 09ro 1 ❑ I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 9tr Ile o; piom ans � - $tr' Ile o; pjo;xp azis f1 - tr $6 lie a} p�a}x az!s {� - tr $tr lle o} p�o;xp az!s - # 8tr Ile o} p�o}xp az!s �' - y 8tr Ile o; pjajxp azls p - tr opewa�4 .S L LL 1 VEL VLPPoN -- ; - ----- -- - punoag Sul}slx3 a}e�}saM pue pao;xp ; to uolpasialul - S# ; ; T Mi ULM �'9fa3t n €ETE99 €ETE99J 9K,L9 OS L' LS otrz'EL 0ss•L5 8tr Ile o; pio;xo az!s n - tr ev Ile o; pjo}xo azis+ v Lu!trZ ISe3 W!ZtrlsgM aull A:padad OZE woa; peoi }o apls y}nos'.lamas WJo}s aaeaaal aleojevq o} aull uol;aas pua paiell jo }ulod uol}:)auuoD - Z# ------ --- ------ .. ---__ ------ - --J- ------ tea, ---- ------- Pu3 pa.lel3 u011ena13 aaelins }1!1:)1saM pue p.lek aaejjal pue a�e.l.lal aoeiial a}e;laeA a}e2JeW - T# as}eAA aH Z 'ieaA-OT a1e2"vl jo 10 u0113asialul - E# uol}:)asaalul tr# I 4 ON 9'OL9 FJ bSiS t. 3F;L S —' l 6e76 i. YYL - • �.. - ... ....- _ _ L c% It —11 *r1 AdAIM - u a> s B tan - € >smT—a 101 V st wolf i �il 114 . - 89S'tr99 E95'h99 --_ Ztr€'999 — - trV8'999 - - L8Z'V94 ipeaH 9LL'bl 5€L"trL LOT L L ZZZ'U 569'£ !PeaH TrIM aa�j aa�j aaij 09tr'SL OLL'09 oL€,9 OWE W'Z 87 Ile a# pjo}xp azas 11- tr ov Ile o} piom -ion - tr $tr Ile a; P13373 azr . p _ q 8tr Ile o; plolxp ausdQ - tr 87 Ile o; plo;x© ays Q - tr opeua�g ZP!7Z4e3 ul9€ 45aM L31W lull Z3JA ?Lull 53:1 1W-lu!l sjlrlsaL[ pue e;eQ (01 ¢4g Pawn i' wull asola - s4uawy3;e:)gns DAIPV t — —� o; pjo}xo azlsdn = t, ddI 10 0 ' uo+!}�a, £wcs3 x�+�U I dx•BL021VUdl4lsd%6u{�ix3_a}eb�eyb MkOOUI. :Para, a113 OH Z 'jeaA-OT) „8b o;.lannaS wjojS 1a!nnaeM pue paojx0 Ile az!sdn - ti# uo!}dp I� cn c3i a C'� CD N ca N •O C'f N — Eq om �L41 e7 Z ` O O a r Q mSo m a Ai Z t0 v CD �• S o �, alb o m ii ju N 0- C 3 fD o o- C N � 3 =r 0— 'a rt cmn �• s N_ r Q N D s 00 KentonnjRd a n` O O X3 N N Beveriy '4p % ©03 o so CO)'o- -- ton Rd Warrington Q 0 o 0 -F N a • V O O V W A O VT O _..y - - -- to j N Kn1 ollwood_Rd co to . 00 ►1� ' 97 IV N W 00 -+ s"► G7 �Y V 00 I f (A ` Y 4 le_'stcliff_Ln 0 n— s� � ►� N W L 7 O 0 o 19 . — tea. dowbrook Ln O col I_— _ W y� �lSt LA � N 3 0 CD 1 O CD F �Q- .y. r- Hamilton_Ln Oxford.Rd . SU; O n n td a1stt�e���o O 0 _w c O O CL ' 3 c U a6P 1 Ua D fD a) (D I�m -"momo +` 11 )- =9; 430 ISOH ❑ O Warrington RdCD — 5 A CD ❑ — ❑ a y O ° 4 N 7 n S I I r � N - N OD s a Ch cn Kenton R d t -Kipling_PI N N I v yI N 'T F,y, �_•.V y i r i w V - � ` 0 s � o; Im JI 0 o o 0 m 69 Westcliff_Ln—-v �• CD o -� 0 G �I Q' Q v cn n, r (D .i - " ° K 7 3 C cp Bevedy Pl 0 2) O CD IN n ❑ O �N 2) Z �(n O D eadowbrook Ln f/1 C rn r o �u cn m °0 O cQ u� etipR� ua D ,v �1 m II r� °1aG CID tAn ce CA � n = � _ om 3r Z c"f (CD N CDo K Pr CD v 0 CD � v O. 2) �^ to 1 CD N Z 0 Kiplmg PI i i I .o - m m {So m Q 0 o, z v aa1 �. CD o. 6 c'}o CD 3T c s N O �] � N r rrww VJ � n Z m v7 OF 1 0 4 c � o a-Q D x r) Of 6 O O On t T- _ O` To o Warrington Rd a p10 I .s rn Kenton Rd s rA- s N ¢1, iV _ i i 0--0 1 F1 (C o x d 0 C �] 0 �7 N I 1 _ ._ 0-1-- a - - -- 0. a �N a �+ a y q (.0 � - �- s O O s a CJ _ . 4 C O O a 0 O N N N tV Knogwood Rd ' Q � p N p'. a n ..:co � 7 � ` O O -Westeliff.Ln -T:,-�- N O a �s Sly s � o � s O 7 Beverly -�- D .i ---- G O N h � 7 Aadowbrook Ln 3 a ro�Vl � J I� I� co - - 4 kcn 0--O--Oxford_Rd �oZ CD 0 CD -n Q CD O W o S p.. ate Trrace 1)�G[S%MappingWatgatn 7errace_CSralfiagoArna mxd Hamilton_Ln s o s � p? O V'1 n. a1��i�eO Id _. Li I Cu 0 ;u C/) CO cp -i 3 u� a6pRi ua D mCD cQ m a :p CA fQ CD CD H 3 to Z !'7 Z 0 N C o z 1 CCD N rt �I eD m a r-r O O m 0 0 S -n 0 tb 3 3 a �o- - {{{—� Warrington Rd �- -- O T O 4 4 Oil Q O N a p A] 4 CO rj S r Q C Q Kenton Rd �S(W .s n � r # I � N t O.V; ;Q` f t i + -�P-- O 0 s Beverly V 0 —d. ht Q Ul ;�koo co L.FI j � ❑ p Westciiff I.-+ - ,-0. 0) _ 0 _ Ir7 y • �r� 0, w -0 -j m CD 0 I X :Q 0 0 Q 0--- - O U! v-.io d-a--- Knollwood Rd 0 0 O v s N 00 N trY � tC v KCn �— oxford _Rd Hamiltori Ln a Q �� � 1 v0 -� 0 (D. O Meadowhrook Ln yCL�°a o--� lh o ' _ r a 0-4wi, - - y r- 0 O 0 _ a j 0.- J 0_ � 0 of ` I� 0 .�, CD to CD o C/) 0— � (D OCL 3 U� a6P1b ua D :E I v lD (p N Z) N •O <'f N B (n Z n Z i 0 II � N CD O z KipIing PI E 2) In 5 ohm uo� ZOO v CD (D ,6 CL A) 3 M. rp 0 v rF Z m �• D Q D : I L�r:dwn 6y I I [ 0) 0 ci .s 7G O o° o-- -�� 0 O i ° O t11 0 N Knollwood_Rd ' s N _bk - A O 'Oxford Rd � i r 0 — � C m`y 0 3 00 ���� CD Hamilton:Ln N'o o�� p , O � �. � v , O tea. O ,,CD^ p Z] (n 0 + 3 ul a6pl2i ua tQ D CD CD cu m m N — —��- -..�0- Fo Warrington Rd a 0 0 •'tea P1 � s r O L117 . 7i L71 � Ken!o_n Rd �C � a f Fr (D o_ 6 G7 ro _ tn GD O O w A Ms 3 4N ^' Beverly PI.'- v iti] p z m D { N) m 7n �" r-PL y W � 0---- N 00 j Lit 00 --- —<0 � nI1 a�Wk 4 00 A r L" i t9 O O r ,W_estcliff Ln—•o-n �j �. _ �. N N W,../� o l 1 � O O a N N Ln O Meadow bFOok s o O O 3 0 q � EL LIJ N A7 o; f m t f� r 7 k ❑ O i ✓f - A Hamilt�r o rfLn Knollwoad Rd} O 2) ym CD A- 0 O 0 LIS'n O �<�y O y rf l f-- O n - oxford_Rd �- y' 0 fli '�► n N � y"P 1— - 1 70 Ln m Cn Q 3 Ln wad m to fO yER O CD O rri 3 LA _ C9z e� Z n N W C O z ic m fli o 1"F c LT n (D x3 m om � 2Afp v CD F"'• N' O CD O ii 0) .N CD �• N Z O � 6 0 c c S - �• ^` �� - � � � - mi ALw6l - �� � - -' - rim = "• , ���.3 y 7 L A FF N,; tW . n � 0 >WOO Cot n. IV W V y (Cn 'CO 0) O r C'1 w� O0) IDV■ -a -h �O O X"O =h g .� o OO = O -1 O O - � i 0 O N 3 O 7� �< r-IOL O p M to 3 � rt n m n © �D (D 0 C/) C/) :3 CD D rn v m h v sapaN pu%l InOLq saPoN 11 66F999 996'L% F- ort,999 I 06TE99 OOL'6L f SEZ'899 o00'9L I SEE'm -- - 00a'o !PeaH 000'0 000'0 DWO 000'0 O00'O 00010 aL€'Z i 06Z'Z ❑ ❑ M, L- 0 — al£ L- Owl() - ozv'o ❑ - owa a g�a; lW aseanul- L 9E ol1W aseaJoul - L 9E a31IN aseanul - L 9E o41W aseanul - L 9E ai IVY 3seanui - L 9E of 1W asean - L ouewas S 1L tLL LI L'EL I - irLL3PoN s i 1 i i camas LuJo;S I punojE) Sul;slx3 I i i nal3 aaepnS a H Z '1 eaA-OT E i e '98SI 01691 h 996'L99 LLS'9L tr' I 996199 J €$Z'£L aaj3 aalj OK L L 0Z5'()! gE a; -m aseanul - L 9E o;1W aseanul - L V luWZ 15e3 W!ZIr759M asolo s4uawg3;e3gnsZAIPV aull A;aadold 0Z£ uaol; alnlongs anoge Sulpuod peol jo apls glnos'lamas sl ll sueaua (-) an13eSaN wlo;S aaellal a;e2aevl of aull uolhas pue palel; aul3 apelg :)pnelpAH ;o lulod uol}aauuo0 - Z# ................................. ..... � 1 pua pale13 JWljlsam pue p1eA aaellal plo}xo aaellal a1e21elN aleOjeVq - T# o�xo pue aaellal 10 u0113aslalul - £# alul S# aleslevq 10 u0113aslalul - b# i PXOAI� 6'6I81 SIM S'Z65 ZML L''�s' ` I-LLT 9'$81 u'o II Kq *.7m U C4 11=1 Imn 441 m I GI Vst U1411 Min WI wpm:), 0Z€'899 OZ€T99 06Z' 8EZ899 - SE€T% !PeaH ZSST ELVSZ 8L8 trZ trLE'£ L- 56917 WaH aalj aa�j aalj aa�3 aa�j L. oZZ K 0£$'9Z 09 L'IN OK'? 9E o; jIN aseanul.- L gE o; JA asean ul - L 9€ 041A aseanul - L 9E 04 BN aseanul - L 9E o; -UN asea3 I - L olleua:)s Zuly lse3 U19E 7-SaM L3iri lull Z3ilN Mull 5331W.IuIl swway pue e1eQ 101 +CPU pI - SE 6111rY aseanul- L d d I Lad n 0 � r� p x uog3as buo3:oguvAa dx'8LO?NVIAASd)(6 lannas w1olS 'opu!.'', ;o All:)ede:) algelleny Mol:laeq e sl -lanaS - ui aH Z '.leapt- Z) „gE of aama aaeaaal aleg.lew azisd � 0 S fl :T# uoildp o ualolS u! Molj lenlay is jov A owo lowo _ 000,0 000'0 000'0 000'0 0091E 0t0'L 09l'9 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ mol j uo uuJeM }Panic - Z mol j U04bulijeM }sn!Q - Z mol j u04uuJeM 7Pa^l(] - Z v s L 11 y 81 L-Ikv—irl a104fln n t70E'E99 VOE'F99 ZZs'LL VZQ'LE. aaij aaJj MIL L 075'01F mo13 uo uweM ParpO - Z mof3 uo »ieM }ea,vQ - Z v l:u!#Z :Pe3 Lu!ZtrlsDM 000,0 000'0 000'o o o 0E L'0 ouweM W^!0 -:Z VEL sepoly } OU% andul 99PON j uajDuuJeM:Pani(p -Z VLl?PPN aull Aliadoid 0ZE woa} 1 peoi }o apls y;nos 'camas wao;S aoejja-L ajeojelnl 01 Dull uolpas pua paael} }o julod u011oauu03 - Z# ;I ' -- — —-------- ; pu3 paae�� uolle�al3 aae}anS FOauopalso,2� xO l a;sa ueale�lsaM as}eM aH Z'aea/� OT eaaa I M P paeA aoeajal punoi9 2ul�slx3 1 a�eaaal a}esaelN a;e2aelN - Z# pue pio}xo A }o }o uolpasaajul - E# }o uoll�asaaIul - S# Iul - b# , 5'�SSES E•RE4S E'�t�n 6trtr'G99 6WV99 E0E' L L Li'tiZ aa� j aa�3 MU l 0Z VZ mol3 uo; uweM:Pan!(1 -Z molj uo; uweM}Pan!{ ZultrZ }sea u19E IsaM, 101 fSO paw.lun 1 W 4Z —1 Niqj eldiunq SS 41 1 k-j S31A *rE ";,—a d 3 al S'ES -011 7,3JA � A-j "P-0 LEZ'999 _ — S6,C999 58Z'499 9 Ltr' l l KTV 6#9'E- aai3 aa�3 Dail OLE'9 004'£ 07E'Z mo13 uo ui.ueM:p;;mG --Z MOI j uo;uweM :Parua - Z Mol j uo;uujeM }pan!p - LUN 3lu!l Z31W "ul7 5331W )Iwll Mqun o'SS !peaHl gnsed pue eIell asolo s;uawy�}e�gns anl}aV jol6ul��eM afl!� Z ddl l_—1 I �_ 1- �-- =a r + A 0 ix3iFE LJ V w �s* L'i ��� uoq3nfmoj3IuieuAo dx'SL0ZW6Nh%Sd) 5ur}srx3-ajebjeW X. • • t 1 L - - - - OH Z'ae@A-OT) uoISulaaeM WOJJ MOIJ JaanlQ — Z# uol}dl n ��j TM n v EEI sepoN liounH indul saPaM1I,1 LL$ 599 0Z8 899 LaE'699 OEE'899 9L l'L99 00£'i�99 WaH j 000'0 000'0 000'0 Oo9'£8 000' L9 owo WTO 900,0 ozro — - - ON L El El "0 a 'R o'o OIF L ON L- Li a5Z o= o5v'a El EJ El Mol j IAanaEl }Pa xlq - E Mal j r ]Janaa Liana❑ - E - - Mali iJanag }paAlq - £ Mol j , .lJanaa }Paniq - £ MOIj pana8 ;rani❑ - E AWIA IMAae }panrq - E ol�eua�s s L - - - — LL IL - L'EL - 11LOPON 6 i aull A:padoid 0Z£ woa; pea }o apls glnos 'aarnaS wiols aDeaial alesaeW of aull uol;aas pua pajel; ;o lulod uollDauuo:) - Z# --- - -77 t - ----- --- ---- - - - - -- '-- - -- i Pu3 Paaelj aleSlsaAA pao}xp .4!InlsaM pue pjeA a3eiJal alesaew - i# pue pro;xp punoagullslx3 pue aoeaaal a�eaaal a;esjel�l #o uolhasialul - S# ale��eW �o 10 uollDasjalul - E# uolhasaa;ul - b# u01;ena13 a:)epnS _ aale/N aH Z'aeaA-0T � y L 01 K —.rl kin Wa(n1'4 11 011 utorl MR 414 a1 POO - ; 04 "tt WOSI ?3LwL 3I'i a vnpwa 0,099 OW9 0Z8's49 oZ8'899 la£'699 LOE'699 0EE's99 9Ll'c9g 00E'b99 !P-H E9L'LL E6f9L Oafs tr1T M LOVZL OLLV- 6E6'E- TJ xM !P-H aaij aalj aaij aaij aaaj aa3j OWN aaid 0LE'9 0b5' L L 0Z5'0tr 08$' L L OOLT 0VE'Z MoI j llama }aaAiq - £ MoI j IAJanaa }aa,vq - E Mol j ]Janaa;aaniq - E Mai j llanaa;aaA!a - E Mal j . IJanaG :pan!(7 - f Mol j Janae laaniq - E Mal j janaa a'anlQ - E oueua.)S LuiVZjse3 LUTtris-am Zu!VZl$e3 um ;Sam U3 #lun Z31W�u!-l. S331W�u?l s4nsalj pue eleq Ivl ARa Pamun MKun asol Loljtlaanag;ari �_j�-I�j VJ�-E �t�m x�V��j 0 (9) a+ ua}7a5 6uol *uQuAo dx 8 LQZINWMI d 6 I _I a;e6jeyl v►aput c,+, mam, ally OH Z `ae@A-OT) AIJanae WOJI MOIJ Iaanlp — F# uolldo n 2 W O'M O'caq �..u..,... r as as won Nw; aidn" 34 of l Dual IgIa Ti"anasuon 1 M ;'£1 uwtJ _7=LM, 7!�.aW / 7i�8'899 E0 IL aaJ3, 075' L L S pJE�+naS •IQ-B� .___ M'099 L960L aaJ3 oZS'otr spJe +nab }1aN�-e£ 9ZE'699 9Z£'649 LZVB99 E00'899 owo !pEaH 066'9 6SL'LL LE07L O£Z'L oueua�S. aaJj aaJ3 aaJg aa�3 a 088' L L spJEA +naS IJanrO-PE OZZ'8Z spJe,�+nab }lama-EE 0LE'9 spJe,�+nab }Janie-e£ OOL'£ SpJEft+li38 }1aN(�-E£ 000'0 s A+naB}Jani�- �Ui7rZ}sE3 LutZt+ N ZU!7Z�e3 U!9£�aM L31Wlu!l Z31W.)U!l S331V4IUI asolo s;uawy:)}e:)gnS anl:Ptl [01 f-a Paf7!tun gaRlun sp�%4 nag JJaaiQ-EE ddMimi lE]IM�_ i= 1 —.o I� + 01x:1 C. ,s , `-:� 14:I f ��R `� x uoipaS 6uol39imuf43 dx'%OZNY4AASd) 6ui}slx3 aleMM :at�putr+� naip al!j uOlPaS 1 1 OH Z 'JeaA-OZ) S33 paeA aeaa a3eaaal a#eSJew aleUlwll3 pue AIJ@Aa8 WOAj nnolJ #aania — e£## uoi#dl see -iv *--Til r 1-1 —rvty i k f LVS'Z99 - EE$"E94` 395'V99 Zt�E'999 VtrS'999 L$Z V99 - - 0a0'0. iPeaH 00010 oa0'o 000•0 000•o o o 0oa'0 oo0'a a0o'o 0W'a o o o o 09fE _ _ ❑ olS'9 D_tra9 olE'0 060'0 El❑ _09V'0 El ❑ El 8V Ile n; pjo jxo az!s n - tr SV Ile o; pio;xo az!s n - tr $V Ile o; plo jxo azis n'- tr at Ile o; Piopo azis f1 - tr $V Ile o; PJoJxp az!s n - tr W Ile n; PAOM az!s ll - V olleuaos S - L - LL L VLOPON I aug Aliadoid OZ£ woa d peoa;o apls y;nos'aam@S wao;S aoeiial a;e;laevq I o; aull uol;aas pua paiel; - ` }o;ulo u0113auuoD - Z# - — — - — — - -- `— -- — - — —�-: - �—------------- -___-__ - I ---------- ---- ------- _-_-�- Pu3 paaelj }}IIo1SaM Pue pJeA a�eaaal punoa9 Sul;slx3 a;e�;saM uo'/VX JH3 a� @A-Ojjns pue aaeaaal a�eaaal a;evaelN a;eSjeVq - T# pue pao;xp as;eM�H Z'�eaA-pT a;eR eW jo 10 uol;:)asja;ul - £# 10 uol;:)asaa;ul - S# uol;JaSaa;ul b# Gi539 tr9Cti4 $ c's i �£91 $'Z4Fs Z'K1 1'=, UlF4 O'RRl S'ri EWE% 9i7E'L9 aa� j 06Z'EL StrIle o; pio}xo ai 1uJi7Z 35e3 9 61 t icon, x„ -1 ark EET E99 %S'M 89S'V99 09 L' LS o 91L'61 SE VilL I aajj aa�j aa�j 0WLS 09tr'.SL 0LL'09 itr Ile o} pjo}xo az!s n - tr Str Ile 44 pjo}xo az!s n - tr 8V ilea; plo}xo.azis rj- 4u!Ztr,111 ZulVZ ISe3 uigE 3,@M 101 &C �!3vf4 aso1z) s4uawip4ogn5 anlPy L r; d'Cv� 1 It UF0,3 NMI aiftfln as 011 UWJa MA Nurl 4Mt 6; t'gt -011 ZMA ]IA-1 IMPU03 ZtrE'999' trf8 999 LSZ'V99 !PeaH LOT L L ZZZ'tr 969'E- !peaH aai3 Str lle a; pio;xp az!s -.tr air iieo; prom axis n - tr SV qe o; Fjo;xxo azisdn -.tr o!ieuaos L31W lull Z31IM Mun 5331A Vu!l — s4nsaH pue PwCj P*!'Un .o4pjojxoazfsdn-t,ddl EI ❑ ® I ,- ? 19�3� X nor}-g 6u01 3pnufq dx'8LOZWVdMSd)(6ui;slx3 a;e6JEVY OH Z'.le@A-OZ) „8b 01 aaMaS wiOIS pimieM pue paojxo Ile azisdn —b# uolldo n V n �u!puod sapoN,#ourrd jndul; sapoN OWS99 OM899 ZZE'M EEh'899 SVO'L% - ZZE'M - xv rpea}.1 o00'o 000'0 000'0 00616 NOT% OW'o 000'0 000'0 00010 000'0 Oo0'0 GOTO OEVO 0Z#'o OOS' L 06Z' L _ OSL' L- OZ5_ o- El ❑ ❑ �!DIMJL,M uo au!l a;eje as - S loixnieM uo au!l a;eJe s - S loimueM uo auil a;eje as - S 13 as _ S 1oiaueM uo au!l a;eie as - S oueua-Is S L LL L L',fl tiLLaPoN. u01;ena13 a�epnS aaleMJH Z'aeaA-01 3'Z4t"s .+rn �ilrss.-vent a,#n.nwr pao}xo pue a:)eajal ale2a eVq ;o uoipasia;ul - b# 1 m it 'mwi ){'JLT eidum - ~i4 03 1 iuol) 391 A *R13s1Wa3 lZ# au!l A�adoid OZE woaj Pew jo ap!s glnos'aannaS wao;S aoeaaal ale2aeA of aull uolhas pua pajell o uiod uoiOauuo� - pu3 paae13 }}!P1saM pue paeA aoeiJal aoeival alesie1N ale2aeA - i# }o uoihasia;ul - E# 1 'o 10. Lb8'894 LiTB'899 #ZE'fi99 frZE' E€i�'849 StrS`L99 ZZ8'L l 9tFO'6L €trS'9 0 LTL L _ Z607 L - LOT9 L&V- 1A XLvq I !Etl aal3 ' l L aa�3 aa�3 aa�j aa�j aa�3 aal3 O7S'L L OZS'Otr OZZ'8Z OLE'9 OOL'£ M-e jouuueM uo':Jurl a;eJe as - S N:)!AIV2M uo alo a;eJedas - S 3pIA L-m uo auil a;Epe as - S �pIMJLm uo au{l a;eye as - alDIMJeM oo auil 9;eJ2 as - S JOINUeM uo'au!l a;eye .s -5 l:)!MIeM uo auil a;eJe aS - S oueua�$ Lu!kZ 4se3 LulZV lsam Zur 15e3 W9€;say.. 21H lull Z311N lu'l sad i N Iu{l F— <ju, lol-Mc[ aSOla _ s;uauii43;e3gn5an!;��{ uaaw;•a;ejeda5-5 j� , A 0 E ,c �� + 1 1 I 0 0 0 C) x uo4ioS Buo3 3aweuAG dx,8LGMV4Ak5d) 6u!;slx3'a;eMRV AloGulM MMA ;MA low- L — OH Z 'aeaA-01) N:)imieM uo auil „9£ aje.ledas ppe pue sea.le weaalsunnop IJaAia — s# uoi}dl _ , _ El TWO I El -- �~^tn,n!O=. � | ` � ' -_ - _-- -- _----. -----_ ------- -------- _ 1 ' =